F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop s about boosting Ryzen 5 3600 to above 4.4Ghz

s about boosting Ryzen 5 3600 to above 4.4Ghz

s about boosting Ryzen 5 3600 to above 4.4Ghz

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
A
AlmightyEag
Posting Freak
785
08-23-2019, 10:42 AM
#11
Thank you for your assistance, both of you. I reduced the CPU to 1.35 and it works well after stability testing in cinabench.
A
AlmightyEag
08-23-2019, 10:42 AM #11

Thank you for your assistance, both of you. I reduced the CPU to 1.35 and it works well after stability testing in cinabench.

P
PGVortex
Member
146
08-25-2019, 03:33 AM
#12
1.42v on Zen 1 (14nm glofo) is accurate.
1.375 on Zen + (12nm glofo) seems correct based on recent reports.
1.325v on Zen 2 (7nm TSMC) reflects the variability of this process node due to silicon manufacturing differences.
P
PGVortex
08-25-2019, 03:33 AM #12

1.42v on Zen 1 (14nm glofo) is accurate.
1.375 on Zen + (12nm glofo) seems correct based on recent reports.
1.325v on Zen 2 (7nm TSMC) reflects the variability of this process node due to silicon manufacturing differences.

P
philipds
Member
60
08-31-2019, 10:47 AM
#13
Following Vdroop could be acceptable, but I recommend returning to 1.325V and staying there. I’m uncertain about the voltage drop on the boards when under load. Cinebench isn’t reliable for stability testing—it only measures short loads and doesn’t reflect real stability performance. (You should use longer tests instead.)
P
philipds
08-31-2019, 10:47 AM #13

Following Vdroop could be acceptable, but I recommend returning to 1.325V and staying there. I’m uncertain about the voltage drop on the boards when under load. Cinebench isn’t reliable for stability testing—it only measures short loads and doesn’t reflect real stability performance. (You should use longer tests instead.)

M
MaryThePooh
Member
101
09-05-2019, 04:08 AM
#14
I'll be back soon after that and will let you know how I'm doing.
M
MaryThePooh
09-05-2019, 04:08 AM #14

I'll be back soon after that and will let you know how I'm doing.

P
PugGamerYT
Junior Member
3
09-09-2019, 05:03 PM
#15
You have a solid gaming board. Consider removing the Core Voltage setting and fine-tuning the CPU Load-Line Calibration until it settles. If the LLC value is too high, Core Voltage will surge; if too low, it will drop below the target. Cinebench isn't sufficient for thorough testing. It's better to run longer tests—like when adjusting multipliers (40x, 42x, etc.)—to confirm stability. Since you mentioned the game runs well, it makes sense to keep the 4.4 GHz overclock. If crashes appear, you'll need to adjust further and conduct more extensive stability checks.
P
PugGamerYT
09-09-2019, 05:03 PM #15

You have a solid gaming board. Consider removing the Core Voltage setting and fine-tuning the CPU Load-Line Calibration until it settles. If the LLC value is too high, Core Voltage will surge; if too low, it will drop below the target. Cinebench isn't sufficient for thorough testing. It's better to run longer tests—like when adjusting multipliers (40x, 42x, etc.)—to confirm stability. Since you mentioned the game runs well, it makes sense to keep the 4.4 GHz overclock. If crashes appear, you'll need to adjust further and conduct more extensive stability checks.

S
Sukibooki
Member
204
09-15-2019, 01:29 PM
#16
Good details. Actually, I wasn't completely confident about Zen+ and Zen2 because I've only used the first generation (Ryzen 1800X) a few years back.
S
Sukibooki
09-15-2019, 01:29 PM #16

Good details. Actually, I wasn't completely confident about Zen+ and Zen2 because I've only used the first generation (Ryzen 1800X) a few years back.

M
MrZesty
Junior Member
11
09-15-2019, 02:09 PM
#17
Zen 1 handled degradation well based on what was observed. AMD used around 1.42V, though the exact figure wasn't clear—it came from cases where components degraded and others didn't. Consensus seemed to settle on 1.375V as a safe limit. Zen 2 began at roughly 1.35V, but later adjustments lowered it to about 1.325V due to silicon degradation issues. Some folks even mentioned running it at 1.32V or less.
M
MrZesty
09-15-2019, 02:09 PM #17

Zen 1 handled degradation well based on what was observed. AMD used around 1.42V, though the exact figure wasn't clear—it came from cases where components degraded and others didn't. Consensus seemed to settle on 1.375V as a safe limit. Zen 2 began at roughly 1.35V, but later adjustments lowered it to about 1.325V due to silicon degradation issues. Some folks even mentioned running it at 1.32V or less.

C
Caesar97
Junior Member
13
09-16-2019, 11:47 PM
#18
Performed a 15-minute CPU stress test at 1.35v and everything held steady. Thank you for the support!
C
Caesar97
09-16-2019, 11:47 PM #18

Performed a 15-minute CPU stress test at 1.35v and everything held steady. Thank you for the support!

T
themoneytree
Junior Member
16
10-04-2019, 09:55 PM
#19
What speed should I use? The 1.325v is still the best choice, but it's your CPU's responsibility.
T
themoneytree
10-04-2019, 09:55 PM #19

What speed should I use? The 1.325v is still the best choice, but it's your CPU's responsibility.

B
BlackShad0w_
Junior Member
4
10-05-2019, 03:19 AM
#20
im at 4.2
B
BlackShad0w_
10-05-2019, 03:19 AM #20

im at 4.2

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next