s about Arch Linux
s about Arch Linux
I successfully got Arch Linux running on my laptop. The biggest hurdle was Wi-Fi since I’m using a Broadcom BCM4352 and Broadcom-wl didn’t want to be installed. I still need to figure out several details. How do I change my wallpaper in i3? Is there a way to make the app menu resemble Spotlight on a Mac, especially since I’m coming from macOS? Can I install a Mac-style dock on i3 (again, coming from macOS)? The Wi-Fi speed is much lower than expected. On my Mac (which was a hackintosh before), I managed around 75 Mbps but the target is 60. I’m using AC Wi-Fi, so it should be slower. What’s causing this issue? (This is running in Firefox, which I’m using until Chrome works) Which file manager would you suggest? Is there an options panel here to make setting up Wi-Fi easier? Lastly, when I run pacman -S, only some apps from the AUR are found. Some are available on their sites (like Google Chrome), but installation fails.
Mac dock - Docky Thunar navigates to the pacman software manager interface. Proceed to settings and appearance. I favor Manjaro personally.
It's tough to check Google for Broadcom drivers and AC speed support on your chipset. You won't find any clear issues with your chipset listed on the Debian or Arch Wiki pages. Review the network commands on those sites to verify signal strength. The software is lightweight but has an unusual name—offers many options. My advice is to set up a full desktop environment such as GNOME or Mate. I’ve managed low-end hardware to run Unity and Gnome3 smoothly without problems. You can find more guidance here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Wir...figuration and https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arc...Repository.
You're seeking alternatives to macOS instead. KDE or a lighter option like MATE would be more fitting. Arch Linux provides binary repositories managed via pacman and the AUR, which can be handled manually through git or scripts such as yaourt. As @SCHISCHKA noted, all relevant details are documented on the Arch Wiki.
It offers distinct qualities that set it apart from PCManFM. The standout aspects include its lightweight nature and the absence of a pre-installed window manager, which gives users more control over their environment. Unlike Arch Linux, it doesn’t require extensive setup or third-party tools like i3, making it simpler for those who prefer a minimal installation. The author appreciates the ability to customize everything personally, which aligns with their preference for self-directed configuration. Compared to Thunar, the focus shifts to usability and visual appeal, with tiling options in i3 being a notable feature. While some users favor GNOME for its polished look, others like i3 for its flexibility. The mention of using a dock highlights a desire for better visibility of background processes, and the author is open to exploring alternatives like XFCE or Cinnamon-based systems. Overall, the choice leans toward personalization and stability over pre-packaged features.
Manjaro is built on Arch Linux, which simplifies the installation process. You won’t have to deal with all those complicated steps.
I like doing it this way—it’s more enjoyable and I feel accomplished when it’s done. I’m a bit puzzled about some details. The main issue is the slow Wi-Fi connection. It’s still a surprise it worked at all, especially since Broadcom Wi-Fi can be tricky on Linux. I’ve made it this far, so there’s no need to change now.
It seems the process appears straightforward—just verifying settings, assigning MAC addresses, and rebuilding the kernel. I’ll give it another shot once I’ve updated to the ck-lts kernel and resolved the aur issue. The differences likely lie in how the kernel handles configurations and networking features.