F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Ryzen R5 3600 4.4GHz clocking at 0.7V

Ryzen R5 3600 4.4GHz clocking at 0.7V

Ryzen R5 3600 4.4GHz clocking at 0.7V

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
D
diogo218dvdv
Senior Member
514
05-29-2019, 07:35 AM
#1
Hello! I'm just starting out with overclocking and tried CTR today. During diagnostics, the voltage kept dropping to 0.6v before my PC crashed. I wanted to see how low I could push the voltage without losing points in Cinebench r20. My typical score is about 3950 at 4450ghz with 1.25v. I ran a test at 0.7v and got 3917. Is the software giving incorrect numbers, or is this normal for an R5 3600? I'm checking the Ryzen Master manual mode for overclocking and voltage tweaks.
D
diogo218dvdv
05-29-2019, 07:35 AM #1

Hello! I'm just starting out with overclocking and tried CTR today. During diagnostics, the voltage kept dropping to 0.6v before my PC crashed. I wanted to see how low I could push the voltage without losing points in Cinebench r20. My typical score is about 3950 at 4450ghz with 1.25v. I ran a test at 0.7v and got 3917. Is the software giving incorrect numbers, or is this normal for an R5 3600? I'm checking the Ryzen Master manual mode for overclocking and voltage tweaks.

K
kreptedcannon
Member
227
05-30-2019, 09:25 AM
#2
What model of motherboard are you using?
K
kreptedcannon
05-30-2019, 09:25 AM #2

What model of motherboard are you using?

P
Patrions_
Member
216
06-01-2019, 03:23 AM
#3
Currently I'm operating with a Strix B450-F.
P
Patrions_
06-01-2019, 03:23 AM #3

Currently I'm operating with a Strix B450-F.

X
X37
Junior Member
17
06-06-2019, 10:54 AM
#4
Your signal strength is 4.325 GHz with a voltage of 1.45V.
X
X37
06-06-2019, 10:54 AM #4

Your signal strength is 4.325 GHz with a voltage of 1.45V.

E
EmmaRosie629
Senior Member
459
06-06-2019, 07:17 PM
#5
I don’t understand how it functions, but I tested the CPU at 4.6 GHz on my old ITX B450 gaming plus AC board. That could mean a surprisingly high 3600 MHz. Is it safe to operate it at such low voltage?
E
EmmaRosie629
06-06-2019, 07:17 PM #5

I don’t understand how it functions, but I tested the CPU at 4.6 GHz on my old ITX B450 gaming plus AC board. That could mean a surprisingly high 3600 MHz. Is it safe to operate it at such low voltage?

T
ThatOneGuy14
Member
157
06-06-2019, 11:12 PM
#6
I believe you secured the silicon prize. It's like winning the biggest prize.
T
ThatOneGuy14
06-06-2019, 11:12 PM #6

I believe you secured the silicon prize. It's like winning the biggest prize.

C
ccmnfairey
Junior Member
1
06-28-2019, 01:55 AM
#7
You can use standard system monitoring tools like Task Manager (Windows) or Activity Monitor (Mac) to find the voltage. If you're unsure, consider using a multimeter for precise readings. Other software such as HWMonitor or Speccy may also provide accurate data.
C
ccmnfairey
06-28-2019, 01:55 AM #7

You can use standard system monitoring tools like Task Manager (Windows) or Activity Monitor (Mac) to find the voltage. If you're unsure, consider using a multimeter for precise readings. Other software such as HWMonitor or Speccy may also provide accurate data.

A
akjosh47
Member
190
06-28-2019, 03:41 AM
#8
CPU core voltage (SVI2 TFN) - your measurement peaks at 1.2v. For frequency checks, consider using Cpu-z.
A
akjosh47
06-28-2019, 03:41 AM #8

CPU core voltage (SVI2 TFN) - your measurement peaks at 1.2v. For frequency checks, consider using Cpu-z.

M
mertofficall
Junior Member
20
06-28-2019, 06:47 AM
#9
Running at 4448Mhz with 1.24 volts is a specific frequency and voltage setting—common in RF testing or specialized applications.
M
mertofficall
06-28-2019, 06:47 AM #9

Running at 4448Mhz with 1.24 volts is a specific frequency and voltage setting—common in RF testing or specialized applications.

E
Evolution88
Member
216
07-16-2019, 09:54 PM
#10
This reading seems correct. (cpu-z v-core) It's interesting to wonder why HWInfo64 isn't precise, as it usually matches expectations on most systems.
E
Evolution88
07-16-2019, 09:54 PM #10

This reading seems correct. (cpu-z v-core) It's interesting to wonder why HWInfo64 isn't precise, as it usually matches expectations on most systems.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next