Ryzen 9 3900X vrs RYZEN 7 3700X
Ryzen 9 3900X vrs RYZEN 7 3700X
Sure! Thinking about your first gaming setup, it's good to weigh the cost of the 3900X against its performance needs. If you're aiming for a smooth and responsive experience, investing in it might be worthwhile. Otherwise, consider what features matter most to you before deciding.
To confirm the previous points, current titles won’t show a significant gap between a 3600 and a 3950x—likely only 1-2% per step or around 5-10% overall across all cores. Looking ahead, we may see changes. We’re reaching a stage where pushing raw speeds isn’t feasible, so developers are shifting toward multicore/multithread designs. Consequently, more games will aim to utilize these features. Eventually, you might notice that using 8, 10, or even 12 cores outperforms 6 cores by a substantial margin. The main question is when games truly benefit from eight or more cores and whether it’s worth sticking with today’s processor for the foreseeable future. For me, several upcoming titles—especially those slated for 2020—have explicitly stated they’re optimizing for higher core counts. Personally, I’m holding off on upgrading unless I see a clear performance leap within the next few years, as I believe we’re still about four to five years away from that point.
I personally prefer the 3700x over the 3600 since it feels like a solid choice for gaming, offering a bit more flexibility for multitasking. While you won’t immediately regret upgrading to a 3700x, you might wish you had chosen something higher in a few years. If you're on a tighter budget and can stretch to a 3900x, that’s fine too. My opinion leans toward the 3700x.
I agree with this analysis, considering the 8700K performance and opting for the 3700X recommendation. You might not miss out on the extra power, especially if you want better results in multitasking or rendering tasks.