F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Ryzen 7 3700X with 4.4 GHz all cores at 1.275V

Ryzen 7 3700X with 4.4 GHz all cores at 1.275V

Ryzen 7 3700X with 4.4 GHz all cores at 1.275V

1
10th_Doctor_
Posting Freak
768
06-06-2019, 08:25 PM
#1
You're checking if running your Ryzen 7 3700X at 4.4V per core with Aida64 and Prime95 is a solid overclock. Many users can achieve this level, though it depends on the chip and conditions. On an Asus TUF gaming X570 Plus with WiFi, it's definitely possible to hit such voltages, but stability and performance will vary.
1
10th_Doctor_
06-06-2019, 08:25 PM #1

You're checking if running your Ryzen 7 3700X at 4.4V per core with Aida64 and Prime95 is a solid overclock. Many users can achieve this level, though it depends on the chip and conditions. On an Asus TUF gaming X570 Plus with WiFi, it's definitely possible to hit such voltages, but stability and performance will vary.

J
jonatan1234
Member
215
06-08-2019, 01:36 AM
#2
Power use and cooling are key concerns. Most Ryzen boards fall short in delivering stable power, unless you invested in a quality board. How much energy do you actually consume? Around 150-160 watts under those speeds?
J
jonatan1234
06-08-2019, 01:36 AM #2

Power use and cooling are key concerns. Most Ryzen boards fall short in delivering stable power, unless you invested in a quality board. How much energy do you actually consume? Around 150-160 watts under those speeds?

N
NiTrOoX_HD
Junior Member
17
06-08-2019, 10:10 AM
#3
Reached a peak of 145 watts at around 92°C during prime time 95, though it was only 120 watts on the 360 model I got yesterday. We’ll see how the 360 performs in regular use; if not, we may need to upgrade to the 4.3 model.
N
NiTrOoX_HD
06-08-2019, 10:10 AM #3

Reached a peak of 145 watts at around 92°C during prime time 95, though it was only 120 watts on the 360 model I got yesterday. We’ll see how the 360 performs in regular use; if not, we may need to upgrade to the 4.3 model.

C
chayden2k6
Member
119
06-15-2019, 12:17 AM
#4
Aida 64 consumes significantly reduced energy during a short 5-minute session with peak 95W output.
C
chayden2k6
06-15-2019, 12:17 AM #4

Aida 64 consumes significantly reduced energy during a short 5-minute session with peak 95W output.

T
TheHappyBunny
Junior Member
12
06-28-2019, 09:28 AM
#5
Absolutely, those values represent throttle temperatures.
T
TheHappyBunny
06-28-2019, 09:28 AM #5

Absolutely, those values represent throttle temperatures.

J
jackhammer64
Member
55
06-28-2019, 03:12 PM
#6
It’ll improve with the new cooler. Just ran Aida 64 at prime 95 and stayed under 87°C all night, even on this average 120AIO.
J
jackhammer64
06-28-2019, 03:12 PM #6

It’ll improve with the new cooler. Just ran Aida 64 at prime 95 and stayed under 87°C all night, even on this average 120AIO.

P
Party_Big
Junior Member
25
06-28-2019, 04:06 PM
#7
You're only reaching about 90 watts. Your tests don't apply.
P
Party_Big
06-28-2019, 04:06 PM #7

You're only reaching about 90 watts. Your tests don't apply.

K
Killemandrun
Member
162
06-30-2019, 08:06 AM
#8
You're noticing your clock isn't showing the expected time drop. It might be a small issue you're overlooking.
K
Killemandrun
06-30-2019, 08:06 AM #8

You're noticing your clock isn't showing the expected time drop. It might be a small issue you're overlooking.

S
sant10
Member
69
06-30-2019, 09:33 AM
#9
During gameplay the CPU temperature stays well below 70 degrees most of the time.
S
sant10
06-30-2019, 09:33 AM #9

During gameplay the CPU temperature stays well below 70 degrees most of the time.