F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Ryzen 5500 performance compared to 5600 and 5600X is solid, offering decent efficiency for everyday tasks.

Ryzen 5500 performance compared to 5600 and 5600X is solid, offering decent efficiency for everyday tasks.

Ryzen 5500 performance compared to 5600 and 5600X is solid, offering decent efficiency for everyday tasks.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
_
_ItzJonathan_
Junior Member
16
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM
#1
I'm choosing parts to upgrade my son's rig, the poor youngster (19 in 2 weeks) only has my old i7-4770K (a great CPU but 9 years old!) along with a 1660S Was thinking of getting him a 5600X around 220EUR, then saw the 5600, 15EUR less and near as good, but it's out of stock at decent price where I live (France)... Now there's the 5500, it's only 175EUR now, read bad reviews about it (GN for example), but it seems to perform only around 15% slower than a 5600X; plus my son only has a GTX1660S on a 1440p monitor, and playing non demanding games like CS:GO, wonder if it'll even change anything for him as he'll certainly always GPU bound ! Any advice ? EDIT : the 5500 is now 150 EUR, maybe a better deal ?
_
_ItzJonathan_
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM #1

I'm choosing parts to upgrade my son's rig, the poor youngster (19 in 2 weeks) only has my old i7-4770K (a great CPU but 9 years old!) along with a 1660S Was thinking of getting him a 5600X around 220EUR, then saw the 5600, 15EUR less and near as good, but it's out of stock at decent price where I live (France)... Now there's the 5500, it's only 175EUR now, read bad reviews about it (GN for example), but it seems to perform only around 15% slower than a 5600X; plus my son only has a GTX1660S on a 1440p monitor, and playing non demanding games like CS:GO, wonder if it'll even change anything for him as he'll certainly always GPU bound ! Any advice ? EDIT : the 5500 is now 150 EUR, maybe a better deal ?

X
65
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM
#2
Construct a 12,100 MHz processor.
X
xR4viingZ0Mbi3
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM #2

Construct a 12,100 MHz processor.

S
Si0neR
Member
235
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM
#3
Sure, I get where you're coming from. It's hard to justify the expense when you're not sure it'll be needed soon.
S
Si0neR
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM #3

Sure, I get where you're coming from. It's hard to justify the expense when you're not sure it'll be needed soon.

J
jjsoini
Posting Freak
809
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM
#4
4770K pairs well with a GTX 1660S. Consider refining it by removing the case and swapping the thermal paste for liquid metal. The 4790K in my wife's system clocks at 4.8Ghz all-core 5.0Ghz single core, which remains quite capable for her GTX 1080—a GPU that outperforms the GTX 1660S.
J
jjsoini
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM #4

4770K pairs well with a GTX 1660S. Consider refining it by removing the case and swapping the thermal paste for liquid metal. The 4790K in my wife's system clocks at 4.8Ghz all-core 5.0Ghz single core, which remains quite capable for her GTX 1080—a GPU that outperforms the GTX 1660S.

S
Selo_Uzumaki
Member
148
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM
#5
It feels reasonable though 12100 looks strong for a $100 item. Still, if you're purchasing now, 12400 is also available. Both options will surpass a 4770k.
S
Selo_Uzumaki
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM #5

It feels reasonable though 12100 looks strong for a $100 item. Still, if you're purchasing now, 12400 is also available. Both options will surpass a 4770k.

G
Gamergirl073
Member
112
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM
#6
Yes, though it might seem old, it’s comparable to Intel’s 11th generation because it uses the same 14nm process. Pushing it to 5GHz would make a great family project, and if the chip fails, I’d consider switching to a different CPU. The i5-12400 would then be my choice.
G
Gamergirl073
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM #6

Yes, though it might seem old, it’s comparable to Intel’s 11th generation because it uses the same 14nm process. Pushing it to 5GHz would make a great family project, and if the chip fails, I’d consider switching to a different CPU. The i5-12400 would then be my choice.

T
147
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM
#7
Initially I considered 12400, but B660 boards are quite costly, and it's hard to determine which cooler matches the new socket...
T
TannerBannaner
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM #7

Initially I considered 12400, but B660 boards are quite costly, and it's hard to determine which cooler matches the new socket...

S
52
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM
#8
Eventually you told me, a 5500, 12100 or even 12400 wasn't a great upgrade over the 4770K. I'm planning to get a 12600KF, which should cost around EUR 270. That CPU looks solid and I hope it lasts as long as the 4770K.
S
SirMemeMachine
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM #8

Eventually you told me, a 5500, 12100 or even 12400 wasn't a great upgrade over the 4770K. I'm planning to get a 12600KF, which should cost around EUR 270. That CPU looks solid and I hope it lasts as long as the 4770K.

A
AwSoMe683
Member
50
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM
#9
All of those are a strong upgrade over the 4770k.
A
AwSoMe683
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM #9

All of those are a strong upgrade over the 4770k.

J
jojobobo04
Member
170
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM
#10
It's clear you're in favor of the 12,100 improvement—significantly boosting performance on both single and multi-core tasks. This would definitely add a major boost, and if it fits your budget, there are no concerns about upgrading to an even quicker solution.
J
jojobobo04
04-01-2017, 04:28 AM #10

It's clear you're in favor of the 12,100 improvement—significantly boosting performance on both single and multi-core tasks. This would definitely add a major boost, and if it fits your budget, there are no concerns about upgrading to an even quicker solution.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next