ryzen 4000
ryzen 4000
I've heard about Zen 3 and its differences from Zen 2. My worry is whether it will be another special chip component. This stems from some architectural overlaps, not a complete overhaul, but in certain sections. I'm concerned about its impact on performance and whether we'll face another major chip release from AMD. I'm not fully sure about the new design yet, so I'd appreciate input from tech reviewers. My main point is to express my concerns about the upcoming changes in 2020 and how they might affect performance. If AMD can make this a successor to Zen, I'd be glad to consider purchasing the chips. Your thoughts would be appreciated.
Perhaps not, but the layout matches in certain parts. If AMD isn<|pad|>, that might cause performance problems. I've seen some presentation slides about how the cores are combined and the cache too. My worries are that AMD might be working on something similar to FX, which could affect speed. I'm just worried it might become a mess if they aren't careful while building the new chip designs.
The latest layout features the cores integrated rather than split into separate CCX or similar modules, as seen in the 3900 which combines two CCX and chiplets for its cores. This results in a cohesive core structure where all components reside within a single unit or die. The cache is also aligned with the cores, though sharing remains a common practice today. My main worries center around pipeline efficiency—potentially reduced due to limited sharing—and possible adjustments in the Infinity Fabric. The presentation they showed at Milan for the Epic chips was impressive, but AMD typically mirrors this approach with their mainstream desktop processors like the Ryzen. If you watch their videos for the Ryzen 4000 or Zen 3, you’ll grasp my concerns. I’m also using FX series chips alongside Ryzen, and I’ve observed their demonstrations on performance improvements. My hope is that AMD can modify the design without compromising the gains they’ve already achieved in Zen, and possibly enhancing them further. Several RedTech Gaming and other YouTube creators have shared their thoughts on these upcoming models, noting that Zen 3 is slated for release next year.
the main concern is the pipeline size in the updated design and whether it will face limitations from changes with new cores and other redesign elements. essentially, I'm worried about any parts that could create a bottleneck affecting performance. zen 2 is more of an update or progression rather than a full redesign, while zen 3 represents a new architecture for ryzen chips with improved overall performance. the new design is what worries me, especially if it introduces any constraints on the cpu that could impact efficiency. the gpu handles graphics or computation for specific tasks, whereas the cpu manages more complex operations.
Zen 2 is a fresh redesign in my book, Zen+ represents the update I don’t notice differs from Zen 2 beyond what Zen 2 brings compared to Zen+. AMD’s approach with Bulldozer shows CPUs prioritize arithmetic, while GPUs focus on floating-point speed. It performed well with custom APUs for consoles but underperformed elsewhere. They won’t repeat that strategy on CPUs.
That's a positive outlook. I'm mainly worried when I watched the redesign videos and noticed the changes. Based on my understanding of hardware, I truly hope AMD won't make the same errors again. Just compare a redesigned architecture to an older one, and you might have some doubts. The presentations usually explain the components and their functions to some extent, so I really hope AMD keeps improving its chips and overall design for CPUs and GPUs. In fact, Navi is expected to undergo a major redesign next year as well. I don't know how strong Navi currently is, but NVIDIA might need to pay close attention to the new graphics cards.