F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Ryzen 1600x - Safe OC temps!?

Ryzen 1600x - Safe OC temps!?

Ryzen 1600x - Safe OC temps!?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
L
Lucastorni
Junior Member
10
10-15-2017, 07:08 AM
#1
Hi everyone,
Just sharing my experience with a new custom build PC and the recent upgrade. I'm planning to experiment with overclocking to understand how my Ryzen performs. I currently have a Wraith Max cooler and am curious about the maximum temperature I can reach. So far, I've managed a stable 3.85 GHz overclock for all cores at around 3.85 GHz, with no changes in BIOS or voltage. The thermal readings were taken via Coretemp, CPUID, and AMD Ryzen Master using Prime 95 and small FFTs.
Attached is the image I took. I'm open to any feedback or suggestions.

Edit: I haven't adjusted fan curves yet. My goal is to set a safe starting point for OC and will explore other settings once I have a stable configuration.
L
Lucastorni
10-15-2017, 07:08 AM #1

Hi everyone,
Just sharing my experience with a new custom build PC and the recent upgrade. I'm planning to experiment with overclocking to understand how my Ryzen performs. I currently have a Wraith Max cooler and am curious about the maximum temperature I can reach. So far, I've managed a stable 3.85 GHz overclock for all cores at around 3.85 GHz, with no changes in BIOS or voltage. The thermal readings were taken via Coretemp, CPUID, and AMD Ryzen Master using Prime 95 and small FFTs.
Attached is the image I took. I'm open to any feedback or suggestions.

Edit: I haven't adjusted fan curves yet. My goal is to set a safe starting point for OC and will explore other settings once I have a stable configuration.

J
Justicemonkey
Member
210
10-15-2017, 08:26 PM
#2
Roland Of Gilead:
Hello everyone,
Just a regular poster and big fan of the community.
I recently upgraded my PC with a custom build, and I wanted to experiment with some overclocking to experience how my new Ryzen performs.
Currently, I have a Wraith Max cooler and am curious about the maximum temperature I can reach for the 1600x rating.
I've managed to get around 3.85 GHz consistently across all cores, even at a conservative 3.85 GHz overclock.
Attached are some screenshots of Coretemp, CPUID, and AMD Ryzen Master with Prime 95 and small FFTs running.
The OC process was simple—just increased the speed to 3.85 without changing voltage or BIOS settings.
Software-based overclocking via Ryzen Master is also being tried.
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
J
Justicemonkey
10-15-2017, 08:26 PM #2

Roland Of Gilead:
Hello everyone,
Just a regular poster and big fan of the community.
I recently upgraded my PC with a custom build, and I wanted to experiment with some overclocking to experience how my new Ryzen performs.
Currently, I have a Wraith Max cooler and am curious about the maximum temperature I can reach for the 1600x rating.
I've managed to get around 3.85 GHz consistently across all cores, even at a conservative 3.85 GHz overclock.
Attached are some screenshots of Coretemp, CPUID, and AMD Ryzen Master with Prime 95 and small FFTs running.
The OC process was simple—just increased the speed to 3.85 without changing voltage or BIOS settings.
Software-based overclocking via Ryzen Master is also being tried.
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

I
ItsWolflord
Member
90
10-16-2017, 04:49 AM
#3
Many users opt for 3.9 safely once temperatures rise and PCs start acting up... lower ambient temps allow pushing further. Depending on the silicon variation, you might reach 4.0 or not—no worries about trying.

Also, my take is to avoid overclocking unless necessary.
If I’m not hitting stock frequencies, what would I do with an OC?
I
ItsWolflord
10-16-2017, 04:49 AM #3

Many users opt for 3.9 safely once temperatures rise and PCs start acting up... lower ambient temps allow pushing further. Depending on the silicon variation, you might reach 4.0 or not—no worries about trying.

Also, my take is to avoid overclocking unless necessary.
If I’m not hitting stock frequencies, what would I do with an OC?

P
pestvogel
Member
231
10-16-2017, 06:25 AM
#4
Prime95 operates significantly hotter than typical real-world tasks, even when CPU usage nears 100%. I would use maximum core temperature readings to adjust fan profiles during HANDBRAKE while it's close to full load (Task Manager) for at least ten minutes. What’s the safe upper limit? I’m struggling with this too—see this article: https://www.kotaku.com.au/2017/03/amds-r...-they-are/. In short, I’d suggest switching to a different cooler since most recommendations only suggest overclocking Ryzen if it outperforms a standard cooler. For instance: https://pcpartpicker.com/product/jK8H99/...5universal. I’m unsure why some coolers are labeled AM4 compatible, as they predate Ryzen; I’d double-check that detail. Just filtering by “AM4” in PCPartPicker gave a decent option. So... my recommendation would be to proceed unless you’re comfortable with the extra noise and overclocking (though you might not reach 4GHz anyway). Temperature readings keep changing, so a small overclock likely makes a big difference.
P
pestvogel
10-16-2017, 06:25 AM #4

Prime95 operates significantly hotter than typical real-world tasks, even when CPU usage nears 100%. I would use maximum core temperature readings to adjust fan profiles during HANDBRAKE while it's close to full load (Task Manager) for at least ten minutes. What’s the safe upper limit? I’m struggling with this too—see this article: https://www.kotaku.com.au/2017/03/amds-r...-they-are/. In short, I’d suggest switching to a different cooler since most recommendations only suggest overclocking Ryzen if it outperforms a standard cooler. For instance: https://pcpartpicker.com/product/jK8H99/...5universal. I’m unsure why some coolers are labeled AM4 compatible, as they predate Ryzen; I’d double-check that detail. Just filtering by “AM4” in PCPartPicker gave a decent option. So... my recommendation would be to proceed unless you’re comfortable with the extra noise and overclocking (though you might not reach 4GHz anyway). Temperature readings keep changing, so a small overclock likely makes a big difference.

M
Mountain_Girl
Member
172
10-16-2017, 11:41 PM
#5
@ somesh101 - Just wanted to check what could be pushed. I'm not someone who goes all out with overclocking, and my systems are already quite capable for the tasks I need them to handle.
@photonboy - Appreciate the tip. The cooler isn't stock, it's the one that usually comes with the 1700x/1800x and is rated at 140w. The 1600x model has a 95w CPU. I expected more room for adjustment. The Wraith Max only starts up smoothly even with moderate overclocking. My idle temps are in the low 30s, gaming temps around 45-55 (depending on the game), and at full load with Prime95 they reach about 3.7 all cores at 77°C max. @3.85 all cores hit 80°C on the button. Just remember I haven't changed any fan settings yet.
Thanks for the help everyone.
M
Mountain_Girl
10-16-2017, 11:41 PM #5

@ somesh101 - Just wanted to check what could be pushed. I'm not someone who goes all out with overclocking, and my systems are already quite capable for the tasks I need them to handle.
@photonboy - Appreciate the tip. The cooler isn't stock, it's the one that usually comes with the 1700x/1800x and is rated at 140w. The 1600x model has a 95w CPU. I expected more room for adjustment. The Wraith Max only starts up smoothly even with moderate overclocking. My idle temps are in the low 30s, gaming temps around 45-55 (depending on the game), and at full load with Prime95 they reach about 3.7 all cores at 77°C max. @3.85 all cores hit 80°C on the button. Just remember I haven't changed any fan settings yet.
Thanks for the help everyone.

C
carp3
Senior Member
572
10-17-2017, 03:53 AM
#6
I’m going to strongly disagree about OCing. When done correctly and carefully, you can experience a smooth increase in speed without any negative consequences...
C
carp3
10-17-2017, 03:53 AM #6

I’m going to strongly disagree about OCing. When done correctly and carefully, you can experience a smooth increase in speed without any negative consequences...

A
aqilthebro
Member
157
10-17-2017, 09:01 PM
#7
I'm going to have to differ in my approach to OCing. When done correctly and carefully, you can achieve a smooth speed increase without any negative effects...
A
aqilthebro
10-17-2017, 09:01 PM #7

I'm going to have to differ in my approach to OCing. When done correctly and carefully, you can achieve a smooth speed increase without any negative effects...

Z
Zatire
Junior Member
2
10-19-2017, 11:31 AM
#8
Hello everyone,
Just a regular poster and big fan of the community. I recently upgraded my PC with a custom build and wanted to experiment with some overclocking to see how my new Ryzen performs.
I'm using a Wraith Max cooler and am curious about pushing the 1600 MHz temperature limit. I've managed to get a stable 3.85 GHz overclock across all cores, according to my readings.
Attached are photos of the Core Temp, CPUID, and AMD Ryzen Master with Prime95 running at small FFTs.
My initial OC was simple—just increased the speed to 3.85 GHz without changing voltage or BIOS settings. Software overclock via Ryzen Master worked well.
Feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Edit: I haven't adjusted fan curves yet. My goal is to set safe OC parameters from a baseline, and I'll experiment with other settings, fans, and OC files once I have a stable configuration.

I own a Ryzen 1600, paired with an MSI Bazooka B350 board and 16 GB of SK Hynix 3000MHz RAM. My overclocking process was straightforward, but I recommend updating the BIOS to the latest version first.
I set the core voltage to 1.325V and frequency to 3.825 GHz. At 3.9 GHz, a significant voltage increase was needed; at 4 GHz, it reached 1.41V. I opted for 3.825 GHz as it offers the best compromise.
For cooling, I use a Phantom Dual Tower CPU cooler—my temperatures stay below 62°C even after two hours of Prime95. With a stock cooler, I expect around 75-80°C, which would be a bit intense but not unreasonable.
I suggest using Ryzen Master beforehand and keeping the voltage in auto mode in the BIOS to avoid locking into incorrect settings.
Z
Zatire
10-19-2017, 11:31 AM #8

Hello everyone,
Just a regular poster and big fan of the community. I recently upgraded my PC with a custom build and wanted to experiment with some overclocking to see how my new Ryzen performs.
I'm using a Wraith Max cooler and am curious about pushing the 1600 MHz temperature limit. I've managed to get a stable 3.85 GHz overclock across all cores, according to my readings.
Attached are photos of the Core Temp, CPUID, and AMD Ryzen Master with Prime95 running at small FFTs.
My initial OC was simple—just increased the speed to 3.85 GHz without changing voltage or BIOS settings. Software overclock via Ryzen Master worked well.
Feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Edit: I haven't adjusted fan curves yet. My goal is to set safe OC parameters from a baseline, and I'll experiment with other settings, fans, and OC files once I have a stable configuration.

I own a Ryzen 1600, paired with an MSI Bazooka B350 board and 16 GB of SK Hynix 3000MHz RAM. My overclocking process was straightforward, but I recommend updating the BIOS to the latest version first.
I set the core voltage to 1.325V and frequency to 3.825 GHz. At 3.9 GHz, a significant voltage increase was needed; at 4 GHz, it reached 1.41V. I opted for 3.825 GHz as it offers the best compromise.
For cooling, I use a Phantom Dual Tower CPU cooler—my temperatures stay below 62°C even after two hours of Prime95. With a stock cooler, I expect around 75-80°C, which would be a bit intense but not unreasonable.
I suggest using Ryzen Master beforehand and keeping the voltage in auto mode in the BIOS to avoid locking into incorrect settings.

K
Kyonae
Member
66
10-25-2017, 10:46 AM
#9
Photonboy shared some insights on Prime95 performance. He mentioned that the CPU runs significantly hotter than expected even when using nearly full CPU usage. He suggests using the maximum core temperature as a guide to adjust fan settings during tasks like HANDBRAKE, checking Task Manager for at least 10 minutes. He also discusses safe operating temperatures and recommends considering a different cooler, pointing to a specific product as a potential option. He notes confusion about temperature readings after overclocking and questions whether the readings are accurate.
K
Kyonae
10-25-2017, 10:46 AM #9

Photonboy shared some insights on Prime95 performance. He mentioned that the CPU runs significantly hotter than expected even when using nearly full CPU usage. He suggests using the maximum core temperature as a guide to adjust fan settings during tasks like HANDBRAKE, checking Task Manager for at least 10 minutes. He also discusses safe operating temperatures and recommends considering a different cooler, pointing to a specific product as a potential option. He notes confusion about temperature readings after overclocking and questions whether the readings are accurate.

D
DJCOOL2008
Member
64
11-09-2017, 01:59 PM
#10
Roland Of Gilead:
photonboy shared some insights on performance tuning.
I’d use the maximum core temperature to adjust fan settings during heavy workloads, such as running HANDBRAKE while the system is near 100% CPU usage, as seen in Task Manager, for a minimum of ten minutes.
What’s the safe upper limit?
I’m struggling with this too—there’s an article here: https://www.kotaku.com.au/2017/03/amds-r...-they-are/.
In short, I’d suggest switching to a different cooler since most recommendations only suggest overclocking Ryzen if it outperforms a standard cooler.
For instance, this cooler looks promising: https://pcpartpicker.com/product/jK8H99/...5universal.
I’m unsure why some coolers are labeled AM4 compatible because they predate Ryzen; I’d double-check that detail. I just selected “AM4” on pcpartpicker to narrow the options and found a decent value.
So, my recommendation would be similar unless you’re okay with increased noise and overclocking (though likely not exceeding 4GHz).
Temperature readings keep confusing me again—overclocking seems to push temperatures higher than expected. The offset displayed on the monitor is particularly misleading.
According to that article, my idle temps are probably in the low 20s, which is hard to accept. I have two 120mm front fans and a rear 120mm fan inside the case. Maybe it’s because the exhaust from the back is handling heat better. I’ve experienced much higher temps with a Q6600, but still find the readings questionable.
What software do you use? I think CPUID Hardware Monitor is the best option. It accounts for the offset and adjusts accordingly. The package temperature shows the CPU temperature, while CPUTIN reflects the socket temperature. My Ryzen 1600 also idles at around 34°C regardless of how cool it feels. I don’t trust idle temperatures as a perfect measure.
D
DJCOOL2008
11-09-2017, 01:59 PM #10

Roland Of Gilead:
photonboy shared some insights on performance tuning.
I’d use the maximum core temperature to adjust fan settings during heavy workloads, such as running HANDBRAKE while the system is near 100% CPU usage, as seen in Task Manager, for a minimum of ten minutes.
What’s the safe upper limit?
I’m struggling with this too—there’s an article here: https://www.kotaku.com.au/2017/03/amds-r...-they-are/.
In short, I’d suggest switching to a different cooler since most recommendations only suggest overclocking Ryzen if it outperforms a standard cooler.
For instance, this cooler looks promising: https://pcpartpicker.com/product/jK8H99/...5universal.
I’m unsure why some coolers are labeled AM4 compatible because they predate Ryzen; I’d double-check that detail. I just selected “AM4” on pcpartpicker to narrow the options and found a decent value.
So, my recommendation would be similar unless you’re okay with increased noise and overclocking (though likely not exceeding 4GHz).
Temperature readings keep confusing me again—overclocking seems to push temperatures higher than expected. The offset displayed on the monitor is particularly misleading.
According to that article, my idle temps are probably in the low 20s, which is hard to accept. I have two 120mm front fans and a rear 120mm fan inside the case. Maybe it’s because the exhaust from the back is handling heat better. I’ve experienced much higher temps with a Q6600, but still find the readings questionable.
What software do you use? I think CPUID Hardware Monitor is the best option. It accounts for the offset and adjusts accordingly. The package temperature shows the CPU temperature, while CPUTIN reflects the socket temperature. My Ryzen 1600 also idles at around 34°C regardless of how cool it feels. I don’t trust idle temperatures as a perfect measure.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next