F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Run Windows 7 as a server and boost RAM performance

Run Windows 7 as a server and boost RAM performance

Run Windows 7 as a server and boost RAM performance

E
Emmelyy
Junior Member
20
04-02-2019, 03:11 PM
#1
simply you want an old PC turned into a Minecraft server. previously you used 2GB RAM, then upgraded to 5GB, now you're at 8GB but switching to 64-bit OS instead of 32. i need advice on what works best. you mentioned having a Windows 7 Professional CD, so that's your starting point. you want to lower the RAM usage to around 1-2GB since the Minecraft server needs at least 4GB. also, you're curious about getting drivers from Windows XP that use only 100-200MB RAM. plus, can you upgrade from XP to a 64-bit version without reinstalling Windows?
E
Emmelyy
04-02-2019, 03:11 PM #1

simply you want an old PC turned into a Minecraft server. previously you used 2GB RAM, then upgraded to 5GB, now you're at 8GB but switching to 64-bit OS instead of 32. i need advice on what works best. you mentioned having a Windows 7 Professional CD, so that's your starting point. you want to lower the RAM usage to around 1-2GB since the Minecraft server needs at least 4GB. also, you're curious about getting drivers from Windows XP that use only 100-200MB RAM. plus, can you upgrade from XP to a 64-bit version without reinstalling Windows?

M
MetySushi
Member
55
04-08-2019, 03:06 PM
#2
For a system with 8GB RAM, a 64-bit operating system is necessary since 32-bit versions limit usage to around 4GB. You won’t be able to simply switch from 32-bit to 64-bit without reinstalling Windows.
M
MetySushi
04-08-2019, 03:06 PM #2

For a system with 8GB RAM, a 64-bit operating system is necessary since 32-bit versions limit usage to around 4GB. You won’t be able to simply switch from 32-bit to 64-bit without reinstalling Windows.

A
alex_oo3
Member
249
04-10-2019, 12:35 PM
#3
You're on XP 32 with 3.5GB, and you're asking about the best choice between Server 2003 and Windows 7 for your needs.
A
alex_oo3
04-10-2019, 12:35 PM #3

You're on XP 32 with 3.5GB, and you're asking about the best choice between Server 2003 and Windows 7 for your needs.

I
iNap
Junior Member
47
04-10-2019, 01:09 PM
#4
Windows 7 or Server 2012 seem to be the top choices. XP and Server 2003 are quite outdated and no longer supported.
I
iNap
04-10-2019, 01:09 PM #4

Windows 7 or Server 2012 seem to be the top choices. XP and Server 2003 are quite outdated and no longer supported.

P
PersieO
Posting Freak
786
04-17-2019, 12:35 AM
#5
aim for minimal resource usage since the system is outdated (2008), which had limitations back then.
P
PersieO
04-17-2019, 12:35 AM #5

aim for minimal resource usage since the system is outdated (2008), which had limitations back then.

K
keith269
Junior Member
39
04-18-2019, 12:07 AM
#6
Maybe opt for Linux to minimize resource usage.
K
keith269
04-18-2019, 12:07 AM #6

Maybe opt for Linux to minimize resource usage.

D
Dylan2500725
Junior Member
18
04-18-2019, 08:25 AM
#7
I'm running Server 2012 R2 and it appears to consume very little RAM when idle. More recent operating systems handle memory better. If you need less RAM, consider installing a clean Debian version, which typically uses under 100MB at the command line (32-bit Debian 7.8 on an older machine I've seen used 17MB after installation according to htop).
D
Dylan2500725
04-18-2019, 08:25 AM #7

I'm running Server 2012 R2 and it appears to consume very little RAM when idle. More recent operating systems handle memory better. If you need less RAM, consider installing a clean Debian version, which typically uses under 100MB at the command line (32-bit Debian 7.8 on an older machine I've seen used 17MB after installation according to htop).

M
mishy07
Senior Member
371
04-19-2019, 11:46 PM
#8
For Minecraft servers, Windows isn't the best choice due to its handling of high loads. The system struggles with events, especially network-related ones. Windows 7 (or desktop) performs even worse, as its networking implementation isn't optimized for such tasks. If you must use Windows, consider Windows Server 2008 R2, which shares the same kernel as Windows 7 and uses less memory compared to Windows 2012 based on Windows 8. For better performance, opt for Linux distributions like CentOS or Ubuntu—they handle events much more efficiently. Running a web server on Windows isn't recommended either. Benchmarks show nginx, a high-performance web server, runs significantly faster on Linux than on Windows. In short: choose Linux for servers. Another option is to tweak the Java garbage collector—there are many guides online. Improving this can cut RAM usage and boost speed, especially important when dealing with Minecraft's heavy resource demands.
M
mishy07
04-19-2019, 11:46 PM #8

For Minecraft servers, Windows isn't the best choice due to its handling of high loads. The system struggles with events, especially network-related ones. Windows 7 (or desktop) performs even worse, as its networking implementation isn't optimized for such tasks. If you must use Windows, consider Windows Server 2008 R2, which shares the same kernel as Windows 7 and uses less memory compared to Windows 2012 based on Windows 8. For better performance, opt for Linux distributions like CentOS or Ubuntu—they handle events much more efficiently. Running a web server on Windows isn't recommended either. Benchmarks show nginx, a high-performance web server, runs significantly faster on Linux than on Windows. In short: choose Linux for servers. Another option is to tweak the Java garbage collector—there are many guides online. Improving this can cut RAM usage and boost speed, especially important when dealing with Minecraft's heavy resource demands.

D
DiazBS
Junior Member
16
04-20-2019, 12:20 AM
#9
I notice the 2012 R2 has less RAM compared to the 2008 R2, yet it lacks some built-in features. Perhaps components like AD work more efficiently with less RAM on the older model, while the newer base design feels lighter.
D
DiazBS
04-20-2019, 12:20 AM #9

I notice the 2012 R2 has less RAM compared to the 2008 R2, yet it lacks some built-in features. Perhaps components like AD work more efficiently with less RAM on the older model, while the newer base design feels lighter.