F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Results from 11th Gen Userbenchmark

Results from 11th Gen Userbenchmark

Results from 11th Gen Userbenchmark

N
Nevik
Member
196
09-06-2023, 01:42 PM
#1
The performance numbers for the latest Intel CPU seem impressive, yet they don't quite reach the extraordinary speed you're expecting.
N
Nevik
09-06-2023, 01:42 PM #1

The performance numbers for the latest Intel CPU seem impressive, yet they don't quite reach the extraordinary speed you're expecting.

G
Gaspoda
Member
246
09-07-2023, 01:19 AM
#2
Userbenchmark is recognized for its strong preference toward Intel. It becomes credible mainly because it appears first in Google searches, while many users skip detailed reviews.
G
Gaspoda
09-07-2023, 01:19 AM #2

Userbenchmark is recognized for its strong preference toward Intel. It becomes credible mainly because it appears first in Google searches, while many users skip detailed reviews.

A
ArceusHD
Member
154
09-07-2023, 09:18 AM
#3
It's clear that many people in the community have strong negative opinions about them. I wouldn't invest in their performance based on what I see.
A
ArceusHD
09-07-2023, 09:18 AM #3

It's clear that many people in the community have strong negative opinions about them. I wouldn't invest in their performance based on what I see.

C
Colefusion
Senior Member
382
09-07-2023, 12:49 PM
#4
Noted the $839 listing for the Ryzen 5900X. NewEgg's price is $549.99 (though stock seems missing). Quite odd how the i9-10900K compares—significantly lower than the i9-11900K, i7-11700K, and even the i5-11600K. Reviews indicate the older i9-10900K outperforms the newer models. UserBenchmark is questionable, likely unreliable.
C
Colefusion
09-07-2023, 12:49 PM #4

Noted the $839 listing for the Ryzen 5900X. NewEgg's price is $549.99 (though stock seems missing). Quite odd how the i9-10900K compares—significantly lower than the i9-11900K, i7-11700K, and even the i5-11600K. Reviews indicate the older i9-10900K outperforms the newer models. UserBenchmark is questionable, likely unreliable.

Z
Zoaxh
Member
147
09-07-2023, 04:19 PM
#5
Userbenchmark treats multi-core scores as 2% of the overall outcome. Therefore, a score of 11900k with one core active is quicker than a 1700x with all cores engaged according to their standards.
Z
Zoaxh
09-07-2023, 04:19 PM #5

Userbenchmark treats multi-core scores as 2% of the overall outcome. Therefore, a score of 11900k with one core active is quicker than a 1700x with all cores engaged according to their standards.