F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Resolved PC thermal throttling issue.

Resolved PC thermal throttling issue.

Resolved PC thermal throttling issue.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
T
Tekjo
Junior Member
11
07-23-2016, 11:11 AM
#11
post a pic of how your case is setup? A 13900 should not be under 30,000 points on Cinebench, all core. So something is still very wrong.
T
Tekjo
07-23-2016, 11:11 AM #11

post a pic of how your case is setup? A 13900 should not be under 30,000 points on Cinebench, all core. So something is still very wrong.

P
PeL1MeN1
Member
59
07-30-2016, 01:37 PM
#12
I mentioned in the post that I set the CPU voltages to their minimum possible values and undervolted significantly to prevent thermal throttling. I think that’s why the plastic component at the base is the "ARGB & PWM HUB"—it doesn’t connect to anything.
P
PeL1MeN1
07-30-2016, 01:37 PM #12

I mentioned in the post that I set the CPU voltages to their minimum possible values and undervolted significantly to prevent thermal throttling. I think that’s why the plastic component at the base is the "ARGB & PWM HUB"—it doesn’t connect to anything.

F
FrightRider05
Member
159
08-04-2016, 05:22 AM
#13
Adjusted the clock ratios back to stock and achieved a score of 15,289. It did throttle the cores 4 and 5, but managed about four extra passes before temperatures stabilized at 100. Probably just due to overheating between polling rates.
F
FrightRider05
08-04-2016, 05:22 AM #13

Adjusted the clock ratios back to stock and achieved a score of 15,289. It did throttle the cores 4 and 5, but managed about four extra passes before temperatures stabilized at 100. Probably just due to overheating between polling rates.

W
WillyMC360
Junior Member
4
08-04-2016, 10:12 PM
#14
It looks stable at 1.306 V now, reduced by another 0.010. The score change is minimal, as shown in a screenshot indicating throttling rather than overheating. I don’t think it’s just about polling rates.
W
WillyMC360
08-04-2016, 10:12 PM #14

It looks stable at 1.306 V now, reduced by another 0.010. The score change is minimal, as shown in a screenshot indicating throttling rather than overheating. I don’t think it’s just about polling rates.

H
HolyNight98
Member
187
08-05-2016, 03:37 AM
#15
I believe I might have discovered part of the problem. It seems the back plate connecting to the CPU cooler is slightly warped along one axis. Applying a bit of pressure on the cooler lowers the temperature, which is visible in the graph when I release it. I’m using the one that came with the CPU, but there’s also a cooler that came with its own plate. I’ll try that one too. The mounting points on the back plate appear to have a tolerance—they’re not fully tight but also aren’t moving anymore. 15557 score now (keeping the cooler at base ratio -0.1 core and GT volts at 1.316v).
H
HolyNight98
08-05-2016, 03:37 AM #15

I believe I might have discovered part of the problem. It seems the back plate connecting to the CPU cooler is slightly warped along one axis. Applying a bit of pressure on the cooler lowers the temperature, which is visible in the graph when I release it. I’m using the one that came with the CPU, but there’s also a cooler that came with its own plate. I’ll try that one too. The mounting points on the back plate appear to have a tolerance—they’re not fully tight but also aren’t moving anymore. 15557 score now (keeping the cooler at base ratio -0.1 core and GT volts at 1.316v).

J
Juan2610
Posting Freak
875
08-05-2016, 01:19 PM
#16
Confirmed setup complete for the 33218 multi 2192 single 15.15x MP model with stock configurations.
J
Juan2610
08-05-2016, 01:19 PM #16

Confirmed setup complete for the 33218 multi 2192 single 15.15x MP model with stock configurations.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2