F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Requesting feedback from the teams on my second version.

Requesting feedback from the teams on my second version.

Requesting feedback from the teams on my second version.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3
S
Stifelplays
Member
112
09-25-2017, 09:45 PM
#21
Do you possess concrete evidence to support this assertion? I haven't encountered any SSD benchmarking results that validate it.
S
Stifelplays
09-25-2017, 09:45 PM #21

Do you possess concrete evidence to support this assertion? I haven't encountered any SSD benchmarking results that validate it.

G
galo2002
Junior Member
7
09-27-2017, 10:33 PM
#22
I believe there might have been a slight misinterpretation. Would it be helpful if we confirmed that 'performance hit will be minimal between MP44 and SN850X' when the drive is used as the OS boot disk?
G
galo2002
09-27-2017, 10:33 PM #22

I believe there might have been a slight misinterpretation. Would it be helpful if we confirmed that 'performance hit will be minimal between MP44 and SN850X' when the drive is used as the OS boot disk?

F
fonsinho
Junior Member
20
09-28-2017, 01:58 AM
#23
Yeah except this is a gaming rig, not a video editing rig. And that might have been the case back in the days of mechanical and SATA HDs, but most M2s have very similar read - write specs and use the same controllers. Yes, performance will be minimal in terms of difference, but I'd much rather pay the extra $20 the better drive, you don't want to get a cheap one and have it fail on you.
F
fonsinho
09-28-2017, 01:58 AM #23

Yeah except this is a gaming rig, not a video editing rig. And that might have been the case back in the days of mechanical and SATA HDs, but most M2s have very similar read - write specs and use the same controllers. Yes, performance will be minimal in terms of difference, but I'd much rather pay the extra $20 the better drive, you don't want to get a cheap one and have it fail on you.

M
MineSharck
Member
183
09-28-2017, 10:15 AM
#24
I agree fully. It's better to invest in reliability than to prioritize speed. They're all quick, but do they really last?
Avoiding compromises and saving a bit of money is a smart choice. It might seem expensive to spend an additional $40-50 on NVMe or PSU, but spreading that cost over 3-4 years makes it much more manageable.
M
MineSharck
09-28-2017, 10:15 AM #24

I agree fully. It's better to invest in reliability than to prioritize speed. They're all quick, but do they really last?
Avoiding compromises and saving a bit of money is a smart choice. It might seem expensive to spend an additional $40-50 on NVMe or PSU, but spreading that cost over 3-4 years makes it much more manageable.

P
PepeTheMeme
Junior Member
13
10-04-2017, 06:10 AM
#25
Yes, it might seem appealing to opt for the more affordable option, but there could be hidden costs later. For storage solutions, just as with power supplies, it's wiser to choose established and reliable brands, such as Samsung, WD, Seagate, and others.
P
PepeTheMeme
10-04-2017, 06:10 AM #25

Yes, it might seem appealing to opt for the more affordable option, but there could be hidden costs later. For storage solutions, just as with power supplies, it's wiser to choose established and reliable brands, such as Samsung, WD, Seagate, and others.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3