F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking really bad ryzen overclock

really bad ryzen overclock

really bad ryzen overclock

M
Mind_YT
Member
70
10-14-2016, 02:30 PM
#1
I'm using a Ryzen 5 1400 at 3.65ghz @1.375v with 8GB Corsair Vengeance LX RAM at 2933mhz. Many people report achieving 3.7-3.8ghz at lower voltages. Are there any fixes, such as a BIOS update? I've noticed some older BIOS versions allow better overclocking. Could this be a case of missing the right hardware or something I'm missing?
M
Mind_YT
10-14-2016, 02:30 PM #1

I'm using a Ryzen 5 1400 at 3.65ghz @1.375v with 8GB Corsair Vengeance LX RAM at 2933mhz. Many people report achieving 3.7-3.8ghz at lower voltages. Are there any fixes, such as a BIOS update? I've noticed some older BIOS versions allow better overclocking. Could this be a case of missing the right hardware or something I'm missing?

P
Proforno
Member
209
10-15-2016, 06:14 PM
#2
Each CPU/MB combination behaves differently. My setup is a Ryzen 1600, and I require 1.325v to achieve 3.8GHz while others say 1.2v is sufficient for their own tuning. Updating BIOS or using new firmware doesn’t automatically change my ability to overclock. As long as you meet the limits you define—voltage, load temperature, etc.—just proceed accordingly.

Also, the idea of a clear stable OC definition seems vague. There are numerous stability tests like prime95, AIDA64, and RB. If someone only succeeded for a short time, is that really reliable? Who knows.
P
Proforno
10-15-2016, 06:14 PM #2

Each CPU/MB combination behaves differently. My setup is a Ryzen 1600, and I require 1.325v to achieve 3.8GHz while others say 1.2v is sufficient for their own tuning. Updating BIOS or using new firmware doesn’t automatically change my ability to overclock. As long as you meet the limits you define—voltage, load temperature, etc.—just proceed accordingly.

Also, the idea of a clear stable OC definition seems vague. There are numerous stability tests like prime95, AIDA64, and RB. If someone only succeeded for a short time, is that really reliable? Who knows.

S
sopispink
Member
217
10-15-2016, 06:33 PM
#3
Each CPU/MB combination behaves differently. My setup is a Ryzen 1600, and I require 1.325v to achieve 3.8GHz while others say 1.2v is sufficient for their own tuning. The new or old BIOS doesn’t always affect the ability to optimize. As long as you hit the limits you define—voltage, load temperature, etc.—just proceed accordingly.

Also, the idea of a clear stable OC definition seems vague. There are numerous stability tests like prime95, AIDA64, and RB. If someone only passed one for about 20 minutes, is that really reliable? Who knows?
S
sopispink
10-15-2016, 06:33 PM #3

Each CPU/MB combination behaves differently. My setup is a Ryzen 1600, and I require 1.325v to achieve 3.8GHz while others say 1.2v is sufficient for their own tuning. The new or old BIOS doesn’t always affect the ability to optimize. As long as you hit the limits you define—voltage, load temperature, etc.—just proceed accordingly.

Also, the idea of a clear stable OC definition seems vague. There are numerous stability tests like prime95, AIDA64, and RB. If someone only passed one for about 20 minutes, is that really reliable? Who knows?

L
LanteanKnight
Member
52
10-15-2016, 09:17 PM
#4
Realbench works well for everyday tasks like light gaming and browsing. I use it for about two hours to check stability under these conditions. For more demanding work such as video editing or heavy data processing, I recommend OCCT. It also runs for two hours. With Ryzen processors, I suggest running MEMTEST64 on overclocked memory at up to 300% coverage just to be thorough. These chips have relatively low IMCs, so it's wise to take extra precautions, particularly with memory.
L
LanteanKnight
10-15-2016, 09:17 PM #4

Realbench works well for everyday tasks like light gaming and browsing. I use it for about two hours to check stability under these conditions. For more demanding work such as video editing or heavy data processing, I recommend OCCT. It also runs for two hours. With Ryzen processors, I suggest running MEMTEST64 on overclocked memory at up to 300% coverage just to be thorough. These chips have relatively low IMCs, so it's wise to take extra precautions, particularly with memory.