F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop RAM & GPU Question

RAM & GPU Question

RAM & GPU Question

J
JeronimoYT
Senior Member
428
08-27-2016, 07:28 AM
#1
I recently had a Dell Dimension XPS Gen 4 and I have several more inquiries about it.
I added 7GB of RAM, but it doesn't recognize more than 3, is this due to the 32-bit architecture or the system's support type?
Additionally, the graphics port is non-functional and won't respond even to an x1 extension. Could it be possible to replace the existing port with a new one?
J
JeronimoYT
08-27-2016, 07:28 AM #1

I recently had a Dell Dimension XPS Gen 4 and I have several more inquiries about it.
I added 7GB of RAM, but it doesn't recognize more than 3, is this due to the 32-bit architecture or the system's support type?
Additionally, the graphics port is non-functional and won't respond even to an x1 extension. Could it be possible to replace the existing port with a new one?

_
_Makson4iK_
Member
51
08-27-2016, 07:46 AM
#2
What is the *full* model number of your machine and the memory module kit that you are using?
_
_Makson4iK_
08-27-2016, 07:46 AM #2

What is the *full* model number of your machine and the memory module kit that you are using?

A
AdictCrazy
Junior Member
18
08-28-2016, 02:40 AM
#3
I own two 512MB NANYA modules and two 1GB misc modules that were included with the system. I have also installed two 2GB ATEC modules and one 2GB Samsung module with a 1GB Samsung module, but only the first 3GB were read.
A
AdictCrazy
08-28-2016, 02:40 AM #3

I own two 512MB NANYA modules and two 1GB misc modules that were included with the system. I have also installed two 2GB ATEC modules and one 2GB Samsung module with a 1GB Samsung module, but only the first 3GB were read.

D
Dithon1
Junior Member
4
09-02-2016, 09:02 AM
#4
DDR2 was appreciated because its short lifespan meant you didn’t have to worry about high or low density, allowing it to fit into nearly any device and still be recognized. However, the 925x chipset from 2004 could only handle up to 4GB of memory addresses and couldn’t map hardware beyond that, even with a 64-bit processor and operating system. The initial Intel chipset that supported unregistered 8GB memory was the 955x from 2005, which was used in Dell Dimension XPS. Later models included 975x and P965 for the new Core 2 architecture. If you’re running Windows XP, a free Gavotte ramdisk can access memory above the standard 3.25GB limit, enabling swapfile usage for unused memory. While these free ramdisks don’t initialize quickly enough in Windows 7 to create a swapfile, they can still serve other roles like scratch disks or disk caching tools such as eBoostr, which also bypasses OS restrictions. It seems you’re likely using a 32-bit PCI slot now, so you could still upgrade to a Voodoo 5 5500 and enjoy smooth 4x supersampling performance. Rotated-grid still offers better visuals than ordered-grid downsampling in DSR/VSR, though the older hardware only supports 640x480 resolution. The Pentium 4 remains a solid choice for that era.
D
Dithon1
09-02-2016, 09:02 AM #4

DDR2 was appreciated because its short lifespan meant you didn’t have to worry about high or low density, allowing it to fit into nearly any device and still be recognized. However, the 925x chipset from 2004 could only handle up to 4GB of memory addresses and couldn’t map hardware beyond that, even with a 64-bit processor and operating system. The initial Intel chipset that supported unregistered 8GB memory was the 955x from 2005, which was used in Dell Dimension XPS. Later models included 975x and P965 for the new Core 2 architecture. If you’re running Windows XP, a free Gavotte ramdisk can access memory above the standard 3.25GB limit, enabling swapfile usage for unused memory. While these free ramdisks don’t initialize quickly enough in Windows 7 to create a swapfile, they can still serve other roles like scratch disks or disk caching tools such as eBoostr, which also bypasses OS restrictions. It seems you’re likely using a 32-bit PCI slot now, so you could still upgrade to a Voodoo 5 5500 and enjoy smooth 4x supersampling performance. Rotated-grid still offers better visuals than ordered-grid downsampling in DSR/VSR, though the older hardware only supports 640x480 resolution. The Pentium 4 remains a solid choice for that era.