RAM: Fake sticks versus genuine sticks – a comparison of quality and performance.
RAM: Fake sticks versus genuine sticks – a comparison of quality and performance.
You purchase them for the appearance and they usually offer a better look than the originals. The combed and waved style versus tightly bundled ones still functions. However, fake RAM doesn't actually work. It's just a label, no real performance. If you're interested, it's fine—we share our thoughts here, and you decide how to proceed.
You're referring to fake RAM modules. They look like regular RAM but don't actually function properly. People have varied opinions on this topic. I wouldn't recommend them just because I don't like RGB technology.
Enhancing performance often comes from adding more real sticks without relying on direct RAM usage. With a dual channel setup and four modules, you'll operate with two DPC units, functioning somewhat like dual rank. On synthetic tests this shows a modest boost in bandwidth alongside a slight rise in latency. Under heavy RAM demands such as large FFTs in Prime95, it can improve speeds by tens of percent. Even without running those programs, using spare RAM might make Windows feel more responsive by caching disk reads. I'm still uncertain whether this applies to SSDs or works differently compared to traditional hard drives.
Not something I’d choose personally, but if you’re determined to fill those slots, opt for the more affordable choice. Ultimately, you’re not purchasing fake RAM sticks, but an RGB lighting strip with a RAM-style connector. A lot of attention goes into the look, so if you’re willing to spend, go for it.