F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop RAM Capacity VS Speed

RAM Capacity VS Speed

RAM Capacity VS Speed

S
SorryNigga
Member
125
09-23-2021, 07:42 AM
#1
When choosing between DDR5 RAM, focus on speed over capacity. Opt for higher MHz ratings like 5200MHz or 6600MHz for better performance. Prioritize the one that matches your needs without exceeding price limits.
S
SorryNigga
09-23-2021, 07:42 AM #1

When choosing between DDR5 RAM, focus on speed over capacity. Opt for higher MHz ratings like 5200MHz or 6600MHz for better performance. Prioritize the one that matches your needs without exceeding price limits.

B
baconman565
Member
207
09-26-2021, 08:50 AM
#2
It’s unclear what a modern system requires 192GB of RAM for. The amount really depends on its purpose.
B
baconman565
09-26-2021, 08:50 AM #2

It’s unclear what a modern system requires 192GB of RAM for. The amount really depends on its purpose.

M
MEEKA2002
Member
67
09-26-2021, 10:45 AM
#3
The purpose is to run demanding applications smoothly. Extra memory helps, but only if you actually need it. For typical users, 16GB should suffice. If you're using DDR5, you might want 32GB or more to prevent slowdowns.
M
MEEKA2002
09-26-2021, 10:45 AM #3

The purpose is to run demanding applications smoothly. Extra memory helps, but only if you actually need it. For typical users, 16GB should suffice. If you're using DDR5, you might want 32GB or more to prevent slowdowns.

T
tbat12
Member
68
09-27-2021, 05:01 AM
#4
Sure, let's focus on one thread for clarity.
T
tbat12
09-27-2021, 05:01 AM #4

Sure, let's focus on one thread for clarity.

W
wiw
Member
223
09-27-2021, 11:29 AM
#5
Having more RAM but not using it fully doesn’t help much. If you’re chasing performance by overspending on large capacities, it’s pointless—those extra 7200+ GB won’t speed up your system meaningfully. You can still upgrade to higher-end chips like the 6000C32/30 or 6400C32 on Intel, which support 8000+ and are built for future needs. Ryzen processors have limited options beyond 6200-6400 MHz. The best all-round choice right now is a 6000C32/30 or 6400C32 on Intel, offering solid performance and the ability to scale up later. For DDR5 platforms, you’re still far from being ready—used parts are scarce and quality is limited. I’m not very familiar with 24Gb SLC and clock speeds yet, since these technologies are new. Also, I haven’t got a dedicated DDR5 motherboard yet; most options are stuck between cheaper, older generations and the expensive, low-quality alternatives.
W
wiw
09-27-2021, 11:29 AM #5

Having more RAM but not using it fully doesn’t help much. If you’re chasing performance by overspending on large capacities, it’s pointless—those extra 7200+ GB won’t speed up your system meaningfully. You can still upgrade to higher-end chips like the 6000C32/30 or 6400C32 on Intel, which support 8000+ and are built for future needs. Ryzen processors have limited options beyond 6200-6400 MHz. The best all-round choice right now is a 6000C32/30 or 6400C32 on Intel, offering solid performance and the ability to scale up later. For DDR5 platforms, you’re still far from being ready—used parts are scarce and quality is limited. I’m not very familiar with 24Gb SLC and clock speeds yet, since these technologies are new. Also, I haven’t got a dedicated DDR5 motherboard yet; most options are stuck between cheaper, older generations and the expensive, low-quality alternatives.

T
Tatyamer23
Junior Member
41
09-27-2021, 02:35 PM
#6
Relies on stick count, single vs dual rank, and placement. AMD appears to struggle with high frequencies in early AM5 chips and boards, making 6600 MHz unlikely, particularly with 4 sticks of 16 GB. 5200 MHz would work better, but the low frequency plus high CAS latency suggests a setup of four 48 GB sticks using 12 or 24 Gbit chips. These are newer, and some BIOS versions might not be optimized, leading to compatibility problems until updates are available.
T
Tatyamer23
09-27-2021, 02:35 PM #6

Relies on stick count, single vs dual rank, and placement. AMD appears to struggle with high frequencies in early AM5 chips and boards, making 6600 MHz unlikely, particularly with 4 sticks of 16 GB. 5200 MHz would work better, but the low frequency plus high CAS latency suggests a setup of four 48 GB sticks using 12 or 24 Gbit chips. These are newer, and some BIOS versions might not be optimized, leading to compatibility problems until updates are available.

C
CrazySmurfGB
Junior Member
45
10-01-2021, 05:08 AM
#7
Tell us about the scenario you're facing, and we'll tailor our support to meet your needs.
C
CrazySmurfGB
10-01-2021, 05:08 AM #7

Tell us about the scenario you're facing, and we'll tailor our support to meet your needs.

F
firestorm22
Junior Member
44
10-02-2021, 04:39 AM
#8
I'm planning to set up the rig for both gaming and video editing. Recently I noticed many AAA titles are demanding more than 32GB of RAM, so I'm making sure I have something that can handle future needs. I'm going with a 13th generation Intel CPU, which should work well without performance problems.
F
firestorm22
10-02-2021, 04:39 AM #8

I'm planning to set up the rig for both gaming and video editing. Recently I noticed many AAA titles are demanding more than 32GB of RAM, so I'm making sure I have something that can handle future needs. I'm going with a 13th generation Intel CPU, which should work well without performance problems.

J
JamboFTW_YT
Member
68
10-02-2021, 05:01 AM
#9
It's smarter to purchase two 16GB units immediately and add more later as needed. Once you hit speeds around 6000MHz, RAM performance drops significantly, making a switch to a 7000-series AMD chip a more cost-effective choice compared to the 13th-gen Intel option. This provides better value at various price levels right now.
J
JamboFTW_YT
10-02-2021, 05:01 AM #9

It's smarter to purchase two 16GB units immediately and add more later as needed. Once you hit speeds around 6000MHz, RAM performance drops significantly, making a switch to a 7000-series AMD chip a more cost-effective choice compared to the 13th-gen Intel option. This provides better value at various price levels right now.

D
DieOrIgnite
Junior Member
6
10-17-2021, 05:05 PM
#10
I've had 8GB since 2014 and it never affected my experience. I'm only beginning to realize my system needs an upgrade. The suggested specs for games haven't increased much in nearly nine years, so I don't expect them to jump suddenly to 128 GB anytime soon. Unless all other components become outdated and you're forced to change, the extra RAM from 64 to 128 or even 192 won't be used effectively. I recommend investing in more RAM (and storage) and opting for 64GB (or 128GB if you really need it) paired with a good 6000 or 6400MHz processor, as some recent posts suggest.
D
DieOrIgnite
10-17-2021, 05:05 PM #10

I've had 8GB since 2014 and it never affected my experience. I'm only beginning to realize my system needs an upgrade. The suggested specs for games haven't increased much in nearly nine years, so I don't expect them to jump suddenly to 128 GB anytime soon. Unless all other components become outdated and you're forced to change, the extra RAM from 64 to 128 or even 192 won't be used effectively. I recommend investing in more RAM (and storage) and opting for 64GB (or 128GB if you really need it) paired with a good 6000 or 6400MHz processor, as some recent posts suggest.