F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Rainbow Six Siege consumes full processing power.

Rainbow Six Siege consumes full processing power.

Rainbow Six Siege consumes full processing power.

K
Kynedee
Posting Freak
784
12-16-2018, 02:44 AM
#1
Recently, I purchased an MSI GS75 Stealth from Best Buy and quickly installed several games on it. However, I’m facing an issue with Rainbow Six Siege. Before proceeding further, here are my specifications: i7-8750H, 6-core RTX 2070 Max-Q, DDR4 2666, a random Toshiba NVMe 500GB SSD with 144 Hz refresh rate on the display. My concern is that I’m struggling to reach more than 100+ FPS. In Task Manager, the CPU usage is at 100% while my GPU stays between 50-60%. Usually, this would be a bottleneck, but it’s the only game causing this problem. Other titles like Fortnite and Overwatch run smoothly, using my GPU fully at 144+ FPS without exceeding 75% CPU. Adjusting settings hasn’t helped. Both Ultra and Low still give around 90 FPS with the CPU at full capacity. No background apps are running except Task Manager. The game is utilizing all my CPU power. I’ve tried enabling V-Sync and using Ubisoft’s FPS limiter in the games .ini file, but it didn’t work. I reached out to Ubi about this, but they dismissed it, saying my CPU couldn’t handle Siege. Thanks in advance for your help.
K
Kynedee
12-16-2018, 02:44 AM #1

Recently, I purchased an MSI GS75 Stealth from Best Buy and quickly installed several games on it. However, I’m facing an issue with Rainbow Six Siege. Before proceeding further, here are my specifications: i7-8750H, 6-core RTX 2070 Max-Q, DDR4 2666, a random Toshiba NVMe 500GB SSD with 144 Hz refresh rate on the display. My concern is that I’m struggling to reach more than 100+ FPS. In Task Manager, the CPU usage is at 100% while my GPU stays between 50-60%. Usually, this would be a bottleneck, but it’s the only game causing this problem. Other titles like Fortnite and Overwatch run smoothly, using my GPU fully at 144+ FPS without exceeding 75% CPU. Adjusting settings hasn’t helped. Both Ultra and Low still give around 90 FPS with the CPU at full capacity. No background apps are running except Task Manager. The game is utilizing all my CPU power. I’ve tried enabling V-Sync and using Ubisoft’s FPS limiter in the games .ini file, but it didn’t work. I reached out to Ubi about this, but they dismissed it, saying my CPU couldn’t handle Siege. Thanks in advance for your help.

T
63
12-16-2018, 08:13 AM
#2
It makes sense to me. Using dual-channel memory could boost your CPU performance.
T
TheSparklyDuck
12-16-2018, 08:13 AM #2

It makes sense to me. Using dual-channel memory could boost your CPU performance.

D
dave_rock
Member
56
12-16-2018, 12:05 PM
#3
I've thought about switching to Dual Channel, but it doesn't seem to solve my issue. My old PC had a 6-core Ryzen 2600 and only used 40-50% during games, which is odd since I'm sure my laptop's CPU isn't much worse despite having the same number of cores—though the Ryzen does handle multitasking better.
D
dave_rock
12-16-2018, 12:05 PM #3

I've thought about switching to Dual Channel, but it doesn't seem to solve my issue. My old PC had a 6-core Ryzen 2600 and only used 40-50% during games, which is odd since I'm sure my laptop's CPU isn't much worse despite having the same number of cores—though the Ryzen does handle multitasking better.

I
iberius13
Member
133
12-18-2018, 12:25 AM
#4
It could have a clear impact. Performance may drop noticeably based on how the laptop's cooling and boost settings are configured. Which clocks are you seeing in the game? If there are no extra frame costs since your CPU is the bottleneck, boosting the graphics might be a good idea.
I
iberius13
12-18-2018, 12:25 AM #4

It could have a clear impact. Performance may drop noticeably based on how the laptop's cooling and boost settings are configured. Which clocks are you seeing in the game? If there are no extra frame costs since your CPU is the bottleneck, boosting the graphics might be a good idea.

E
EilaMummo
Member
116
12-19-2018, 11:36 AM
#5
At first, clocks increased to 4 GHz on all cores, but temperatures rose sharply before stabilizing around 3.5–3.6 after a short time. Yes, I kept graphics set to Ultra.
E
EilaMummo
12-19-2018, 11:36 AM #5

At first, clocks increased to 4 GHz on all cores, but temperatures rose sharply before stabilizing around 3.5–3.6 after a short time. Yes, I kept graphics set to Ultra.

D
Dragon__07
Junior Member
16
12-27-2018, 03:15 AM
#6
Your R5 2600 offers improved IPC, faster clock speeds, and dual-channel memory compared to the mobile i7.
D
Dragon__07
12-27-2018, 03:15 AM #6

Your R5 2600 offers improved IPC, faster clock speeds, and dual-channel memory compared to the mobile i7.