F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop R7 3700X versus i7 7700K – performance comparison.

R7 3700X versus i7 7700K – performance comparison.

R7 3700X versus i7 7700K – performance comparison.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
M
MacSolaris
Senior Member
457
05-26-2019, 02:20 PM
#1
Hello, your question needs a bit of check-up. You're considering upgrading to an AMD CPU for the first time—specifically an 8C/16T model after your 3700X and 7700K. It's smart to think about timing and performance. With newer games offering more threads, you're right to weigh the benefits. Your current setup has a solid 32GB RAM with 3333Mhz memory, which is great for stability. If you're planning a future upgrade, consider whether higher clock speeds would really make a difference or if your system is already optimized. The ASUS TUF Gaming X570-Plus is a good choice, but always test changes in a controlled environment before committing.
M
MacSolaris
05-26-2019, 02:20 PM #1

Hello, your question needs a bit of check-up. You're considering upgrading to an AMD CPU for the first time—specifically an 8C/16T model after your 3700X and 7700K. It's smart to think about timing and performance. With newer games offering more threads, you're right to weigh the benefits. Your current setup has a solid 32GB RAM with 3333Mhz memory, which is great for stability. If you're planning a future upgrade, consider whether higher clock speeds would really make a difference or if your system is already optimized. The ASUS TUF Gaming X570-Plus is a good choice, but always test changes in a controlled environment before committing.

Y
Yakito
Junior Member
11
05-28-2019, 09:10 AM
#2
4c/8t to 8c/16t represents a major leap forward. Future titles will likely render your 4c/8t setup obsolete. While you can still enjoy games and watch hentai in the background on 8c/16t, using 4c/8t will become quite challenging.
Y
Yakito
05-28-2019, 09:10 AM #2

4c/8t to 8c/16t represents a major leap forward. Future titles will likely render your 4c/8t setup obsolete. While you can still enjoy games and watch hentai in the background on 8c/16t, using 4c/8t will become quite challenging.

G
GodGamerTje
Junior Member
18
05-28-2019, 10:56 AM
#3
You pulled the trigger too early, but considering the situation over the past ten years, the 3700X remains useful.
G
GodGamerTje
05-28-2019, 10:56 AM #3

You pulled the trigger too early, but considering the situation over the past ten years, the 3700X remains useful.

B
BruceJH
Member
173
05-28-2019, 02:31 PM
#4
I'll be in the minority here and say, if all you were doing was gaming, then no, it wasn't really worth it because the 7700k still has some life left in it. Generally worst case scenario: It's not a HUGE difference. And this is a stock 7700k. See attachment for RDR2 from Gamers Nexus - still not huge. Were I you, I would have held on until Ryzen 4000 at least, which is reported to be even faster (and probably actually beat intel at gaming through and through) and you will notice a huge difference. But, it's a good chip, and you can still use your 7700k for other things. Can also try to sell it to people who foolishly bought i5s. The 3700x will also demolish the 7700k at anything else. If it was me I'd return it and hold out on the 7700k until next summer when 4000 launches.
B
BruceJH
05-28-2019, 02:31 PM #4

I'll be in the minority here and say, if all you were doing was gaming, then no, it wasn't really worth it because the 7700k still has some life left in it. Generally worst case scenario: It's not a HUGE difference. And this is a stock 7700k. See attachment for RDR2 from Gamers Nexus - still not huge. Were I you, I would have held on until Ryzen 4000 at least, which is reported to be even faster (and probably actually beat intel at gaming through and through) and you will notice a huge difference. But, it's a good chip, and you can still use your 7700k for other things. Can also try to sell it to people who foolishly bought i5s. The 3700x will also demolish the 7700k at anything else. If it was me I'd return it and hold out on the 7700k until next summer when 4000 launches.

D
DustyFlash
Junior Member
5
05-28-2019, 03:07 PM
#5
Great! Your reply and the information are appreciated.
D
DustyFlash
05-28-2019, 03:07 PM #5

Great! Your reply and the information are appreciated.

B
BodYNou_PvP
Junior Member
36
05-28-2019, 10:54 PM
#6
Another source focusing on the 3700x version. There are definitely some enhancements, though I'm not sure if it's a major shift. Most titles on this platform now have higher minimum requirements, while others see no change. A few exceptions even show better performance with the 7700k. The FPS drops aren't bad on the 7700k, which seems to be the key point.
B
BodYNou_PvP
05-28-2019, 10:54 PM #6

Another source focusing on the 3700x version. There are definitely some enhancements, though I'm not sure if it's a major shift. Most titles on this platform now have higher minimum requirements, while others see no change. A few exceptions even show better performance with the 7700k. The FPS drops aren't bad on the 7700k, which seems to be the key point.

S
SwagShamann
Member
68
05-29-2019, 02:33 AM
#7
I would have picked the ASUS ROG Strix X570-I Gaming for $250, offering the best VRM but lacking a post code, clear CMOS, and other extreme OC features. The ASUS ROG Crosshair 7 Hero Wi-Fi is available for $230 with many overclocking capabilities, though it doesn’t support PCIe 4.0, lacks a post code, and has no BIOS Flashback. Non-WiFi versions are $20 cheaper. The board is solid, with good heatsinking. I realize my mistake—TUF Gaming Plus is also a strong option at $195, includes Wi-Fi, solid VRM, some T/S features, and a decent heatsink. I didn’t notice your motherboard, possibly another TUF model that didn’t meet expectations. All these boards are confusing with similar naming; it’s tough to keep track. You definitely need BIOS Flashback if you plan to use Ryzen 4000 series.
S
SwagShamann
05-29-2019, 02:33 AM #7

I would have picked the ASUS ROG Strix X570-I Gaming for $250, offering the best VRM but lacking a post code, clear CMOS, and other extreme OC features. The ASUS ROG Crosshair 7 Hero Wi-Fi is available for $230 with many overclocking capabilities, though it doesn’t support PCIe 4.0, lacks a post code, and has no BIOS Flashback. Non-WiFi versions are $20 cheaper. The board is solid, with good heatsinking. I realize my mistake—TUF Gaming Plus is also a strong option at $195, includes Wi-Fi, solid VRM, some T/S features, and a decent heatsink. I didn’t notice your motherboard, possibly another TUF model that didn’t meet expectations. All these boards are confusing with similar naming; it’s tough to keep track. You definitely need BIOS Flashback if you plan to use Ryzen 4000 series.

V
Viizion_PvPz
Senior Member
670
06-02-2019, 06:32 AM
#8
It seems you're discussing a PC upgrade, specifically moving away from the i7 7700K. You're asking for more details about your graphics card and screen configuration.
V
Viizion_PvPz
06-02-2019, 06:32 AM #8

It seems you're discussing a PC upgrade, specifically moving away from the i7 7700K. You're asking for more details about your graphics card and screen configuration.

Z
Zelda_Boy
Member
114
06-08-2019, 11:54 PM
#9
I've upgraded my graphics card to nearly 2.2Ghz with an 8Ghz memory clock. My monitor is a 24-inch Dell model with a 2560x1440 resolution, 1ms refresh rate, and 165Hz refresh.
Z
Zelda_Boy
06-08-2019, 11:54 PM #9

I've upgraded my graphics card to nearly 2.2Ghz with an 8Ghz memory clock. My monitor is a 24-inch Dell model with a 2560x1440 resolution, 1ms refresh rate, and 165Hz refresh.

A
aduke253
Member
72
06-16-2019, 02:54 AM
#10
All these measurements use a 2080ti, which means your outcomes will appear even more subtle
A
aduke253
06-16-2019, 02:54 AM #10

All these measurements use a 2080ti, which means your outcomes will appear even more subtle

Pages (2): 1 2 Next