R6S community too toxic
R6S community too toxic
CoD players usually come from a younger or close-knit group, which can make them a bit more toxic. Online gaming often gives people the impression they can express themselves freely behind a mask of anonymity. This perception is hard to change. It's similar to how people behave on YouTube—real comments would be different.
I believe your statement would be clearer if it was phrased more broadly. There’s no need to resort to sensationalizing the media portrayal of games. On the topic, from my perspective, the issues online are usually driven by two main elements: a large group often lacks critical thinking, and the feeling of anonymity online can amplify emotional reactions. Expanding on this, people who are less intelligent may experience greater emotional volatility. When paired with the second point, it creates a situation where frustration can quickly escalate. Additionally, human perception plays a role—we tend to avoid self-criticism, so we unconsciously focus on others’ errors to protect our own image. There’s also a tendency toward negativity bias.
This has been an ongoing issue since VOIP became common. Even with text chat. If you're too skilled for pubs, you can exploit it. And in OW, if a player is struggling, it's usually someone else's responsibility, even though they're at fault. I've faced criticism for standing up for another player against unfounded complaints. I tend to get that reaction because I dislike complainers and don't invest heavily in every ranked match (since at my level those don't matter much). The main concern lies with developers and their approach to community monitoring. If they could pay attention to reported games or issues with 2-3+ reports, it might help. But currently, it's mainly telemetry and chat logs.
.
They don't care about anything except the top level.
The main purpose of the ranking system in any game is for a player to show they're good enough to be a pro. That's all.
Other things are just personal opinions people use to justify spending time or effort.
My favorite example is braindeads using rank to support their argument, even though it doesn't matter in the conversation
.
Unless there have been major changes after I stopped comp gaming, the ranked ladder isn't conclusive evidence. LAN and online tournaments exist. Of course, you can demonstrate your abilities on the ladder, but organizations are seeking more than just that. They don't choose the best of the ladder; they select individuals who fit the team, even in one-on-one matches.
I believe there's a big difference between team games (like mobas or team shooters like CS:GO or R6S) and 1v1 ones like SC2, HS etc.
When it's the latter sure you can start joining smaller tourneys, prove your skill and maybe don't even look for a gaming org but rather some sponsors to join bigger tourneys.
With team games you either create your own team and try your luck in small tourneys or climb rank, make yourself a name there (as on the highest level you tend to play with the same people over and over) and thenget scouted or make your move and engage the org on your own.
Just compare history or players like Scarlett, Nerchio vs Topson, s1mple, Caps.
Why do people complain about toxicity in competitive games? No one is pushing you to play if you can't handle the pressure. If you play poorly just to climb ranks, you'll get banned. This happens with every game that has competition and players focused on winning—like League of Legends, Overwatch, CS:GO, Siege, and Battlefield. It's really annoying how games meant for adults don't use strong language or let teammates know the reality because it's too risky.
ALERT, ALERT! A FLAMER HAS BEEN DETECTED, AGAIN!
We don’t dwell on emotions but aim to address the issue directly. Take a breath and consider what you’re doing.
It seems you might be missing the point entirely—this kind of reaction only serves to waste energy. Are you curious about why this frustration shows up? Perhaps it’s because your current mindset isn’t suited for solving problems or finding logic.
If you’re at the same level, you’re not in a position to judge fairly. And if you’re in the same situation, you’re definitely in the right place.
You also overlook the fact that this behavior comes from within a competitive framework. Why? Because some individuals lack the mental clarity to analyze situations or grasp their true nature, so they rely on emotions instead of logic.
If you want advice: pay closer attention to those who consistently emphasize self-improvement over blame. Focus on your own performance and learn from your own mistakes.
Flaming won’t help you progress; it only leads to wasted effort. Get a clearer perspective or seek guidance.
There’s one final point to remember: people make errors. Be prepared for them.
On a less optimistic note: even if you improve, others will still make mistakes—especially since you’ll be stronger and more aware of them.
This misconception and the belief that it matters are what harm both sides.
Flaming isn’t a healthy way to compete. Realizing this sooner is better for your well-being.
Want me to demonstrate this quickly? Imagine a team succeeding in a toxic setting—would you want to be part of it?
Maybe explore proper feedback methods, as a good starting point.
And become familiar with research linking criticism to performance if that doesn’t help you understand.
Hope expanding your understanding is something you’re open to, even if it feels outside your comfort zone.
Nonsense. Individuals often react impulsively for various reasons. Harmful language is common, and adults should avoid using strong terms.