F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Quiet operation with Be Quiet! Dark Rock Pro 3 on I7 5820K at 4.4Ghz

Quiet operation with Be Quiet! Dark Rock Pro 3 on I7 5820K at 4.4Ghz

Quiet operation with Be Quiet! Dark Rock Pro 3 on I7 5820K at 4.4Ghz

T
TritoneDIM
Junior Member
13
12-30-2016, 12:59 PM
#1
Will the Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 3 CPU cooler suffice for an overclocked 5820K at 4.4GHz and 1.495 volts? If not, then I'll go with an AIO cooler. Just a quick question for the forum members.
T
TritoneDIM
12-30-2016, 12:59 PM #1

Will the Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 3 CPU cooler suffice for an overclocked 5820K at 4.4GHz and 1.495 volts? If not, then I'll go with an AIO cooler. Just a quick question for the forum members.

M
MaryThePooh
Member
101
12-30-2016, 05:32 PM
#2
The 5820k is just a 140 watt CPU, while the Dark Rock Pro 3 can manage a 250 watt TDP CPU, so even after overclocking it should work well. You'll also need effective case cooling to supply ample airflow and a strong exhaust fan to dissipate heat. In short, everything should function smoothly.
M
MaryThePooh
12-30-2016, 05:32 PM #2

The 5820k is just a 140 watt CPU, while the Dark Rock Pro 3 can manage a 250 watt TDP CPU, so even after overclocking it should work well. You'll also need effective case cooling to supply ample airflow and a strong exhaust fan to dissipate heat. In short, everything should function smoothly.

C
211
12-30-2016, 11:12 PM
#3
The 5820k is just a 140 watt CPU, while the Dark Rock Pro 3 is built for a 250 watt TDP CPU, so even after overclocking it should work well. You'll also need effective case cooling to supply ample airflow and a strong exhaust fan to dissipate heat. In short, everything should function smoothly.
C
coolbencool890
12-30-2016, 11:12 PM #3

The 5820k is just a 140 watt CPU, while the Dark Rock Pro 3 is built for a 250 watt TDP CPU, so even after overclocking it should work well. You'll also need effective case cooling to supply ample airflow and a strong exhaust fan to dissipate heat. In short, everything should function smoothly.

M
matthewt2001
Member
86
01-01-2017, 02:34 PM
#4
2.495 volts would fry that chip immediately. I think you meant 1.495.
M
matthewt2001
01-01-2017, 02:34 PM #4

2.495 volts would fry that chip immediately. I think you meant 1.495.

P
PandaHaley614
Member
59
01-11-2017, 11:12 AM
#5
I wouldn't push beyond 1.4v continuously on these chips. If you do, it's likely to deteriorate quickly. I've been running at 1.325v for mine at 4.4Ghz since the X99 platform came out. Usually, 1.3v is the safe maximum for long-term use.
P
PandaHaley614
01-11-2017, 11:12 AM #5

I wouldn't push beyond 1.4v continuously on these chips. If you do, it's likely to deteriorate quickly. I've been running at 1.325v for mine at 4.4Ghz since the X99 platform came out. Usually, 1.3v is the safe maximum for long-term use.

D
Dohndude
Member
186
01-11-2017, 06:06 PM
#6
2.495 volts would fry that chip instantly. I think you meant 1.495.
Sorry for the mistake.
D
Dohndude
01-11-2017, 06:06 PM #6

2.495 volts would fry that chip instantly. I think you meant 1.495.
Sorry for the mistake.