Question New PC Build - Is the Asus Auto Overclocking profile suitable for X670E boards when using Noctua NH-D15S?
Question New PC Build - Is the Asus Auto Overclocking profile suitable for X670E boards when using Noctua NH-D15S?
These are the parts I'm considering. They will be combined with the 7900 xtx that I already possess but isn't being used well on my i7 8700k system.
https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/jRvmgB
Based on what I've seen in this video, I think I can apply the Asus X3D Overclock Profile found in the Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI. View: https://youtu.be/90UBUq1mLGY?si=EgD4QDZ6Eu0cbDrF
From what I understand, AMD experienced some problems with 7 series Ryzen CPUs overheating. However, a recent BIOS update has been released to prevent them from exceeding a certain voltage. Additionally, Asus had encountered issues with a resistor being damaged on some boards, but this problem has been resolved in newer models.
Given this context, I remain somewhat concerned about using an auto overclocking profile on this Asus board, particularly with the Ryzen 7 CPU. I'm hoping that both Asus and AMD have found a solution to this issue, making this easy overclock feature safe and straightforward to try.
In the best case, I imagine turning it on would keep the Noctua NH-D15s cool enough. The Asus auto overclock profile is well-designed and appears safe to use. After all, it's meant to be an accessible overclocking tool for beginners like me, and I'm hoping it won't push the CPU into risky conditions.
I plan to enable PBO and Expo as well, and try to set the RAM up to 6400, though it might need adjustment to 6200 or 6000 depending on how the CPU performs. Detailed instructions are available in the video above.
I'm also open to experimenting with curve-optimized settings to apply a negative offset per core, which the video explains well. This could help PBO boost individual cores more effectively if I tweak each one separately, or use a less precise all-core curve as demonstrated in the video.
I don't prefer AIO coolers and am not ready for a full water cooling setup. The Noctua NH-D15s is the best air cooler I know, so I'll be using it.
I'm currently running AAA games at 1440p ultra settings. I also play competitive games and want to minimize input lag, micro stutters, and 1% lows, while maximizing frames at 1440p ultra if possible.
A worse situation would be spending extra on the Asus X670 instead of opting for a Gigabyte B650 and simply using PBO and Expo. And the RAM would need to be clocked down to 6000, though upgrading the CPU could eventually bring it up to 6400—though that would take years. The 6400 RAM is only a few dollars more than 6000, so I'm not too concerned about the cost.
Even if my cooling isn't sufficient for the Asus Overclock profile (which seems to be hard-coded without stress testing individual components, likely designed for a broad range of 7800x3D builds?), the risk of crashes or overheating would be high. I'd prefer not to risk damaging the CPU. The downside is feeling like I've wasted a lot on an X670 motherboard.
In the worst case, the CPU could fail, forcing me to return it to Amazon and buy a replacement. Or, in a more dire scenario, they might refuse a refund or charge for damages. Would the extra performance be worth it? My main goal is to reduce input lag, micro stutters, and frame drops for competitive gaming.
Although I'll eventually need a new monitor, I'm hoping for 3440x1600 at 240hz. Currently, such high resolutions at 240hz aren't available. They offer more vertical pixel density than typical 2440x1440 or 3440x1440 monitors and are widescreen, but without needing to render as many pixels as 4K.
Thank you for any advice that could help me decide.
In short, is the X670 Asus board a good investment, or should I save around 100 dollars and choose the B650 instead?
i'm concerned about doing manual overclocking but would prefer using the auto overclock option instead.
Even when it functions, the settings are generally quite mild or even suboptimal. Manufacturers prefer avoiding any risk of damaging components. Moreover, most contemporary processors are engineered to a uniform standard with minimal differences between units, which is why overclocking is often unnecessary. The latest Ryzen models utilize cutting-edge technology that enables extremely tight tolerances—often indicated by an "X" in the model name. These variants have been tested to achieve slightly improved performance margins compared to non-X versions, though they can be adjusted to match non-X models through BIOS tweaks that AMD considers suitable. In essence, it's more effective to fine-tune the BIOS settings, enhance cooling, and manage voltage rather than attempting aggressive overclocking. The built-in temperature, voltage, and load limits of Ryzen restrict traditional overclocking efforts. Additionally, the 5000 and 7000 series can safely operate at significantly higher temperatures—generally between 90-95°C—before experiencing a drop in boost or performance. Mid-80s CPUs represent the target range; lower temperatures yield no benefit, not to mention reduced lifespan.
I would definitely like any automatic overclock to be "safe," meaning the system shouldn't crash right away during the process.
Nevertheless, most overclocks for modern CPUs only offer real advantages in certain specific situations. Intel and AMD CPUs intentionally boost performance (boost) only when required, up to a level determined by your cooling setup.
Automatic single or dual core boosting for lightly threaded applications will decline if you force a permanent overclock; however, if your PC is mainly used for rendering tasks, an all-core boost might still be worthwhile.
I support manual overclocks on older CPUs and would gladly increase the speed of 10-year-old dual and quad core models by more than a gigahertz, though I haven’t modified my 7950X or 3800X systems and haven’t used PBO.
Beyond a few "nice" benchmark results, you’re unlikely to see any noticeable gains, since these chips are already heavily overclocked.
If you wish to approach the process carefully, invest in an LN2 cooling solution and a quart of liquid nitrogen. This should help you achieve better benchmark scores.