PUBG thrives because it offers an engaging battle royale experience with a strong community and regular updates.
PUBG thrives because it offers an engaging battle royale experience with a strong community and regular updates.
It's not widely popular, and it's quite simple. It's just this year's DayZ, Rust, or H1Z1. You're buying these games and they keep making them.
Essentially, it feels like the same ideas are being used over and over again. The "battle royale" style in games is already tired, and this title stands out because it’s so different from what came before. You also hinted that it’s not as original as it seems.
I don't agree with that claim—it's currently ranked second on Steam.
Have you seen that chart for over two hours? It updates weekly, and popularity grows beyond just being "trending." Just because many people are playing it doesn’t guarantee it’s widely accepted.
Currently, there are just three titles featuring battle royale mechanics: Arma 3, H1Z1, and PUBG. PUBG is an enhanced edition of Arma 3 and H1Z1.
Sure, right now you're just a kid, haven't you? You've missed out on the last decade of games that are similar to this one...