F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Problems with Ryzen 5 3600 at 4.4GHz speed

Problems with Ryzen 5 3600 at 4.4GHz speed

Problems with Ryzen 5 3600 at 4.4GHz speed

C
CCSparkles
Junior Member
3
08-01-2019, 11:12 PM
#1
I've been exploring the overclocking options for my Ryzen 5 3600 and encountered some unusual outcomes. I used the BIOS tool instead of Ryzen Master. At 4.4Ghz with 1.35V, the system booted up smoothly. During stress tests, it performed well without issues. When I increased to 4.5Ghz at the same voltage, it was stable but a bit shaky. I then returned to 4.4Ghz and gradually lowered the voltage until I reached [email protected], which seemed unexpected given other reports online. I hesitated to go even lower. After an hour of stress testing with AIDA64, Cinebench r15, and r20, the system ran smoothly until Prime95 was introduced. To make Prime95 function correctly, I had to raise the voltage to 1.275V. It's interesting that minor FFT tests indicated a potential virus, yet the CPU die reached 96°C while the overall temperature stayed at 65°C. It appeared the heat generated by the 7nm process wasn't dissipating quickly enough through the IHS to the cooler (NZXT Kraken X62, 280mm AIO). I checked Ryzen Master, HwInfo, and CPUID with HWMonitor for temperature and voltage readings. Anyone else have similar experiences with other Ryzen 3000 series CPUs under those conditions? Thank you ahead for your response.
C
CCSparkles
08-01-2019, 11:12 PM #1

I've been exploring the overclocking options for my Ryzen 5 3600 and encountered some unusual outcomes. I used the BIOS tool instead of Ryzen Master. At 4.4Ghz with 1.35V, the system booted up smoothly. During stress tests, it performed well without issues. When I increased to 4.5Ghz at the same voltage, it was stable but a bit shaky. I then returned to 4.4Ghz and gradually lowered the voltage until I reached [email protected], which seemed unexpected given other reports online. I hesitated to go even lower. After an hour of stress testing with AIDA64, Cinebench r15, and r20, the system ran smoothly until Prime95 was introduced. To make Prime95 function correctly, I had to raise the voltage to 1.275V. It's interesting that minor FFT tests indicated a potential virus, yet the CPU die reached 96°C while the overall temperature stayed at 65°C. It appeared the heat generated by the 7nm process wasn't dissipating quickly enough through the IHS to the cooler (NZXT Kraken X62, 280mm AIO). I checked Ryzen Master, HwInfo, and CPUID with HWMonitor for temperature and voltage readings. Anyone else have similar experiences with other Ryzen 3000 series CPUs under those conditions? Thank you ahead for your response.

K
KasieKat
Member
188
08-02-2019, 04:56 PM
#2
It seems you're noticing improved silicon quality in newer batches, which could mean your CPU is from that updated version.
K
KasieKat
08-02-2019, 04:56 PM #2

It seems you're noticing improved silicon quality in newer batches, which could mean your CPU is from that updated version.

C
castielqueen
Member
228
08-02-2019, 09:54 PM
#3
This is an excellent result. If prime95 is the only workload that requires 1.275 volts, don't bother.
C
castielqueen
08-02-2019, 09:54 PM #3

This is an excellent result. If prime95 is the only workload that requires 1.275 volts, don't bother.

B
BHLxNJx
Posting Freak
881
08-04-2019, 04:18 AM
#4
It's quite remarkable how effective the silicon is, yet the heat dissipation from the die to the IHS remains surprisingly low. Under 1.275V and a standard stress test, the die reaches 76°C while the IHS stays at 56°C. I've noticed others achieving about 80°C at 1.4V. When I set it to 1.35V, it climbs to 85-90°C during normal testing. The Prime 95 model stops immediately because the temperatures exceed 100°C.
B
BHLxNJx
08-04-2019, 04:18 AM #4

It's quite remarkable how effective the silicon is, yet the heat dissipation from the die to the IHS remains surprisingly low. Under 1.275V and a standard stress test, the die reaches 76°C while the IHS stays at 56°C. I've noticed others achieving about 80°C at 1.4V. When I set it to 1.35V, it climbs to 85-90°C during normal testing. The Prime 95 model stops immediately because the temperatures exceed 100°C.

D
DuckZi
Member
194
08-04-2019, 07:18 AM
#5
Encountering thermal limits at 4.4 GHz. Excellent silicon quality here. For stability, monitor WHEL errors in the event viewer—this highlights issues that can be fixed. To achieve full stability, avoid these correctable errors during stress testing.
D
DuckZi
08-04-2019, 07:18 AM #5

Encountering thermal limits at 4.4 GHz. Excellent silicon quality here. For stability, monitor WHEL errors in the event viewer—this highlights issues that can be fixed. To achieve full stability, avoid these correctable errors during stress testing.

J
Jarranield
Member
161
08-05-2019, 03:43 PM
#6
Received a solid processor. I’d maintain it at 1.250 because lower voltage might cause issues under lighter loads over time. Prime is a better sign of reliability than temperatures.
J
Jarranield
08-05-2019, 03:43 PM #6

Received a solid processor. I’d maintain it at 1.250 because lower voltage might cause issues under lighter loads over time. Prime is a better sign of reliability than temperatures.