F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Problem with Opera GX data speed Issue affecting connection quality and loading times

Problem with Opera GX data speed Issue affecting connection quality and loading times

Problem with Opera GX data speed Issue affecting connection quality and loading times

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
G
genis260
Member
53
11-04-2021, 01:57 PM
#11
I'm still struggling to understand my reply either. The style is hard to interpret clearly. There are at least five ways someone could read the tone of my answer, and I appreciate you pointing it out as Debian's nonsense—I agree with that. It seems too easy to dismiss.

I was wondering if you'd prefer a different browser instead of Opera. Have a pleasant day, and maybe consider Firefox or Apple’s Safari? Why? Opera was fine before 2013. In fact, Opera had a "mini" version for flip phones back in 2006! That was impressive. It ran its own web engine called "Presto" and had some cool features. Then another company took over Opera in 2013, and since then it’s mostly become a Chromium-based browser—similar to Microsoft Edge, Brave, and Vivaldi. Vivaldi is interesting because they’re trying to revive some of Opera’s old interface.

Back to Firefox or Safari. These are the only two independent web browsers we have today. Firefox uses Gecko/Quantum, and its development began with Netscape in 1996—originally called Pheonix, then Firebird, and finally Firefox. Safari relies on WebKit, which comes from KDE or Qt Linux. Everything else depends largely on the Google Chrome codebase.

What bothers me is that I accept your criticism and reply back three times, trying to highlight how it’s still used by many companies today. It feels disrespectful and arrogant to me. I’m not happy with that approach. In the future, I’ll wait until I’m sure my message comes across without seeming rude. It’s not worth it.

Seeing your response made me feel foolish and self-important. I didn’t want that. My point was that even with Linux’s many flaws (like packaging issues and software only for certain distros), it remains popular in the cloud sector. That’s all, but I didn’t need to defend myself so hard. Thank you for agreeing—I was trying to show that Debian’s incompatibility with Red Hat/Fedora is a lie. Personally, I don’t have much pride, but I think being open to improvement is important.
G
genis260
11-04-2021, 01:57 PM #11

I'm still struggling to understand my reply either. The style is hard to interpret clearly. There are at least five ways someone could read the tone of my answer, and I appreciate you pointing it out as Debian's nonsense—I agree with that. It seems too easy to dismiss.

I was wondering if you'd prefer a different browser instead of Opera. Have a pleasant day, and maybe consider Firefox or Apple’s Safari? Why? Opera was fine before 2013. In fact, Opera had a "mini" version for flip phones back in 2006! That was impressive. It ran its own web engine called "Presto" and had some cool features. Then another company took over Opera in 2013, and since then it’s mostly become a Chromium-based browser—similar to Microsoft Edge, Brave, and Vivaldi. Vivaldi is interesting because they’re trying to revive some of Opera’s old interface.

Back to Firefox or Safari. These are the only two independent web browsers we have today. Firefox uses Gecko/Quantum, and its development began with Netscape in 1996—originally called Pheonix, then Firebird, and finally Firefox. Safari relies on WebKit, which comes from KDE or Qt Linux. Everything else depends largely on the Google Chrome codebase.

What bothers me is that I accept your criticism and reply back three times, trying to highlight how it’s still used by many companies today. It feels disrespectful and arrogant to me. I’m not happy with that approach. In the future, I’ll wait until I’m sure my message comes across without seeming rude. It’s not worth it.

Seeing your response made me feel foolish and self-important. I didn’t want that. My point was that even with Linux’s many flaws (like packaging issues and software only for certain distros), it remains popular in the cloud sector. That’s all, but I didn’t need to defend myself so hard. Thank you for agreeing—I was trying to show that Debian’s incompatibility with Red Hat/Fedora is a lie. Personally, I don’t have much pride, but I think being open to improvement is important.

C
Cherrie24
Member
179
11-16-2021, 08:53 PM
#12
Adjusting the format—whether digital or paper—doesn't alter the essence of our interaction. Whether I wrote on paper or a screen, the core of communication remains the same. The choice of medium only shifts how we express ourselves, not the importance of the message. Pixel and ink are both forms of text, both carrying ideas across distances. It matters because each method shapes the way we convey meaning, reinforcing that its value lies in the content, not the form.
C
Cherrie24
11-16-2021, 08:53 PM #12

Adjusting the format—whether digital or paper—doesn't alter the essence of our interaction. Whether I wrote on paper or a screen, the core of communication remains the same. The choice of medium only shifts how we express ourselves, not the importance of the message. Pixel and ink are both forms of text, both carrying ideas across distances. It matters because each method shapes the way we convey meaning, reinforcing that its value lies in the content, not the form.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2