F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Problem with game performance in Skyrim

Problem with game performance in Skyrim

Problem with game performance in Skyrim

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
M
meli999
Junior Member
4
12-20-2016, 03:52 PM
#11
It seems the issue might be with Cinebench, not your CPU. Joke aside.
M
meli999
12-20-2016, 03:52 PM #11

It seems the issue might be with Cinebench, not your CPU. Joke aside.

E
EclipseGamiing
Junior Member
4
12-23-2016, 07:48 AM
#12
Someone referred to cine bench. It seems odd you assume I'm a pro AMD just because I dislike bad PC ports. In my last update, I shared real benchmarks proving Bethesda performs poorly on my system—running at 4.4 with a 3570k causes stuttering and only 60% GPU usage during traversal. It doesn't really matter, Skyrim is terrible even when Rift is enabled.
E
EclipseGamiing
12-23-2016, 07:48 AM #12

Someone referred to cine bench. It seems odd you assume I'm a pro AMD just because I dislike bad PC ports. In my last update, I shared real benchmarks proving Bethesda performs poorly on my system—running at 4.4 with a 3570k causes stuttering and only 60% GPU usage during traversal. It doesn't really matter, Skyrim is terrible even when Rift is enabled.

I
iFlawlyPvP
Junior Member
33
12-24-2016, 05:20 AM
#13
It seems like you're struggling with modding or your hardware isn't performing well. I suggested using Cinebench as a test. If you lack sufficient power, tweak the settings. Don't hold the developer responsible for your system's limitations.
I
iFlawlyPvP
12-24-2016, 05:20 AM #13

It seems like you're struggling with modding or your hardware isn't performing well. I suggested using Cinebench as a test. If you lack sufficient power, tweak the settings. Don't hold the developer responsible for your system's limitations.

M
Mirrorous
Member
148
12-25-2016, 05:07 AM
#14
It's just as reasonable to point out the manufacturer when software fails to utilize its full potential. Speaking of customization, modding with Bethesda is the only approach that keeps their games running, and no one should defend a company that ignores users and expects them to patch the game. The mods I received were mostly patches, fan creations, and the game itself struggles below 60 FPS on a CPU. It's odd you mention Cinebench when it shows the AMD 8350 can outperform many Intel i5s—yet it only reaches about half speed because Bethesda isn't capable of coding.
M
Mirrorous
12-25-2016, 05:07 AM #14

It's just as reasonable to point out the manufacturer when software fails to utilize its full potential. Speaking of customization, modding with Bethesda is the only approach that keeps their games running, and no one should defend a company that ignores users and expects them to patch the game. The mods I received were mostly patches, fan creations, and the game itself struggles below 60 FPS on a CPU. It's odd you mention Cinebench when it shows the AMD 8350 can outperform many Intel i5s—yet it only reaches about half speed because Bethesda isn't capable of coding.

E
ES_BlackFire
Member
68
12-25-2016, 05:27 AM
#15
You don't update often, right? Start from the first page of Witcher 3 on the Nexus, mostly fixes. All games behave like that. With the right mods and a solid CPU, there are no issues—my CPU stays under 30% and my GPU works intermittently, using just one GPU at a time. You can keep playing however you like, but checking your system will always reveal the problem, nothing will change.
E
ES_BlackFire
12-25-2016, 05:27 AM #15

You don't update often, right? Start from the first page of Witcher 3 on the Nexus, mostly fixes. All games behave like that. With the right mods and a solid CPU, there are no issues—my CPU stays under 30% and my GPU works intermittently, using just one GPU at a time. You can keep playing however you like, but checking your system will always reveal the problem, nothing will change.

Q
quang05
Junior Member
1
12-26-2016, 02:12 PM
#16
You're completely delusional. That's the only conclusion, in my first post I put benchmarks that point out how skyrim mishandled CPUs, relying almost entirely on single Threaded speed not taking advantage of multi Threaded architecture. Like I'm done here, I have no reason to believe you're not just lying to protect precious Bethesda, who make worse PC ports than UbiSoft
Q
quang05
12-26-2016, 02:12 PM #16

You're completely delusional. That's the only conclusion, in my first post I put benchmarks that point out how skyrim mishandled CPUs, relying almost entirely on single Threaded speed not taking advantage of multi Threaded architecture. Like I'm done here, I have no reason to believe you're not just lying to protect precious Bethesda, who make worse PC ports than UbiSoft

J
jf_poli
Member
111
01-01-2017, 08:28 PM
#17
Haha, looks like I was just joking around. It makes sense that people don’t get AMD for gaming—single-core performance is the norm right now. Bethesda can handle itself.
J
jf_poli
01-01-2017, 08:28 PM #17

Haha, looks like I was just joking around. It makes sense that people don’t get AMD for gaming—single-core performance is the norm right now. Bethesda can handle itself.

I
IRonicGaming
Junior Member
10
01-02-2017, 01:58 AM
#18
Well, that's just Skyrim. You could add an ENB and some mods to improve things. Better to make it look nice instead of struggling with performance issues.
I
IRonicGaming
01-02-2017, 01:58 AM #18

Well, that's just Skyrim. You could add an ENB and some mods to improve things. Better to make it look nice instead of struggling with performance issues.

E
Eusebio06
Senior Member
595
01-06-2017, 04:20 AM
#19
You're not alone in this! I've got a K enbs on quality plus a bunch of mods. Around 40-45 in Whiterun and similar numbers in Riverwood, 65-85 open world varies with activity, and 95-110 indoors, reaching up to 1440p. When 3D vision struggles at 30 fps, the open world slows down to 55-65 indoors. Skyrim is pretty demanding on the CPU, but I think it also benefits from a GPU boost. After upgrading my 4820k, I saw about a 9 fps increase, which seems to help the graphics card a bit more.
E
Eusebio06
01-06-2017, 04:20 AM #19

You're not alone in this! I've got a K enbs on quality plus a bunch of mods. Around 40-45 in Whiterun and similar numbers in Riverwood, 65-85 open world varies with activity, and 95-110 indoors, reaching up to 1440p. When 3D vision struggles at 30 fps, the open world slows down to 55-65 indoors. Skyrim is pretty demanding on the CPU, but I think it also benefits from a GPU boost. After upgrading my 4820k, I saw about a 9 fps increase, which seems to help the graphics card a bit more.

H
HeatherHannah
Member
194
01-07-2017, 04:09 PM
#20
It's really tempting, but I'd prefer at least some smooth 35 fps in white run rather than frustrating sub-20 fps. Someone should give this person a recognition! This is exactly what I've been hoping for—no need to make this thread about AMD vs Intel fans. Thanks, mate! I wasn't expecting Skyrim to be such a poor port; it's disappointing.
H
HeatherHannah
01-07-2017, 04:09 PM #20

It's really tempting, but I'd prefer at least some smooth 35 fps in white run rather than frustrating sub-20 fps. Someone should give this person a recognition! This is exactly what I've been hoping for—no need to make this thread about AMD vs Intel fans. Thanks, mate! I wasn't expecting Skyrim to be such a poor port; it's disappointing.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next