F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Problem - Activating SVM leads to significant BCLK variations

Problem - Activating SVM leads to significant BCLK variations

Problem - Activating SVM leads to significant BCLK variations

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
D
203
06-14-2022, 06:59 PM
#11
Hyper-V is turned off, just using Sandbox as a VM with a clean Windows setup. It seems enabling Sandbox automatically activates the hypervisor. The performance drop isn’t huge, but after spending time adjusting memory settings and running tests, this really reduces the value. My CPU now runs at 4450MHz instead of 4550MHz, Infinity Fabric is at 1866MHz instead of 1900MHz, and DRAM speed is 3733MT/s versus 3800MT/s. Even without launching it, having Sandbox enabled in Windows makes it easy to run when needed. If this only happens once I open the VM, I’d be fine, but most of the time I don’t use it. It’s handy to have it available when required.
D
demenciossauro
06-14-2022, 06:59 PM #11

Hyper-V is turned off, just using Sandbox as a VM with a clean Windows setup. It seems enabling Sandbox automatically activates the hypervisor. The performance drop isn’t huge, but after spending time adjusting memory settings and running tests, this really reduces the value. My CPU now runs at 4450MHz instead of 4550MHz, Infinity Fabric is at 1866MHz instead of 1900MHz, and DRAM speed is 3733MT/s versus 3800MT/s. Even without launching it, having Sandbox enabled in Windows makes it easy to run when needed. If this only happens once I open the VM, I’d be fine, but most of the time I don’t use it. It’s handy to have it available when required.

T
Tristcuit_
Member
53
06-14-2022, 11:37 PM
#12
This situation is really annoying. I plan to bring it up to the Sandbox community and Windows support for their insights. At the moment, my main concern is that a small amount of resources are being used by the program on the host machine, which might indicate a bug affecting only high-end users. Do you know if the sandbox runs on X86 or X64?
T
Tristcuit_
06-14-2022, 11:37 PM #12

This situation is really annoying. I plan to bring it up to the Sandbox community and Windows support for their insights. At the moment, my main concern is that a small amount of resources are being used by the program on the host machine, which might indicate a bug affecting only high-end users. Do you know if the sandbox runs on X86 or X64?

Pages (2): Previous 1 2