Pre-applied heat paste or U-Applied heat paste
Pre-applied heat paste or U-Applied heat paste
Hi all,
I’m planning to build my first PC soon and wanted to know whether to use pre-applied thermal paste or make my own. I’ll be upgrading the cooler to a light overclock for a Ryzen 5 1600 at 3.5GHz from 3.2GHz. First, does the original cooler come with pre-applied paste or not? Second, how significant are the temperature differences—will it be around 10°C less than pre-applied or just a few degrees? I’m also considering using Arctic MX4 thermal paste. Lastly, is pre-applied paste suitable for overclocking and does it affect the lifespan of the paste? Thanks!
Even without pre-applied paste, it's simple to use—just a tiny drop of the size of a corn kernel at the center of the processor will do the job. There isn't a significant gap between top and worst pastes; only minor differences exist, though some options can create larger variations. For example, liquid metal might work but is hard to apply and poses risks. Choose OEM paste for optimal results, and always clean the surface with pure alcohol beforehand.
Even without pre-applied paste, it's simple to use—just a tiny drop of the size of a corn kernel at the center of the processor will do the job. The difference between top and bottom pastes is minimal, with only a few degrees varying, though some products can create more noticeable changes; however, they are harder to apply and may pose risks. Choose OEM paste for optimal results, and ensure you clean the surface thoroughly with pure alcohol before use.