F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Poor performance when booting or playing games on Windows 10.

Poor performance when booting or playing games on Windows 10.

Poor performance when booting or playing games on Windows 10.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
A
applejack0205
Member
56
01-14-2016, 11:09 AM
#1
You're experiencing a slow startup with Windows 10, seeing the motherboard logo first, then a blank screen for about half a minute, followed by login and finally your desktop. This isn't unusual after an upgrade. The long boot times could be due to driver issues or hardware conflicts. Running games often worsens the problem, especially if they require high performance. Your specs (i7 5775c, dual R9 380, 4GB RAM) are solid, but ensure your drivers are fully updated and compatible with Windows 10.
A
applejack0205
01-14-2016, 11:09 AM #1

You're experiencing a slow startup with Windows 10, seeing the motherboard logo first, then a blank screen for about half a minute, followed by login and finally your desktop. This isn't unusual after an upgrade. The long boot times could be due to driver issues or hardware conflicts. Running games often worsens the problem, especially if they require high performance. Your specs (i7 5775c, dual R9 380, 4GB RAM) are solid, but ensure your drivers are fully updated and compatible with Windows 10.

R
Rubicube59
Member
192
01-18-2016, 09:03 PM
#2
It may take some time for drivers to be fully adjusted, so be prepared to wait a bit
R
Rubicube59
01-18-2016, 09:03 PM #2

It may take some time for drivers to be fully adjusted, so be prepared to wait a bit

R
Ravenpolly
Member
58
01-20-2016, 10:08 AM
#3
He’s facing very long startup times. He’s impatient and doesn’t grasp the situation, so he tried an older version—hoping it would feel faster on a solid-state drive. Still, I’m looking forward to it!
R
Ravenpolly
01-20-2016, 10:08 AM #3

He’s facing very long startup times. He’s impatient and doesn’t grasp the situation, so he tried an older version—hoping it would feel faster on a solid-state drive. Still, I’m looking forward to it!

I
Im_Eni
Junior Member
18
02-09-2016, 12:33 AM
#4
Did you get the latest software update? Here’s the link: http://support.amd.com/en-us/download/de...ws+10+-+64
I
Im_Eni
02-09-2016, 12:33 AM #4

Did you get the latest software update? Here’s the link: http://support.amd.com/en-us/download/de...ws+10+-+64

G
GeT_KuBeQ
Junior Member
9
02-15-2016, 01:53 PM
#5
You're running an SSD with a Kingston HyperX Savage 240 drive.
G
GeT_KuBeQ
02-15-2016, 01:53 PM #5

You're running an SSD with a Kingston HyperX Savage 240 drive.

N
Nashiko57
Senior Member
485
02-15-2016, 03:36 PM
#6
It was saved a few hours back, yet this version seems different—I have the earlier one from July 27th.
N
Nashiko57
02-15-2016, 03:36 PM #6

It was saved a few hours back, yet this version seems different—I have the earlier one from July 27th.

M
mrminer02
Member
183
02-16-2016, 02:34 PM
#7
The 5775C @ 4.2 is impressive, especially when contrasted with a 4.5-4.8 devils canyon.
M
mrminer02
02-16-2016, 02:34 PM #7

The 5775C @ 4.2 is impressive, especially when contrasted with a 4.5-4.8 devils canyon.

D
DJbehouden
Member
55
02-17-2016, 04:12 AM
#8
It is, but sadly not a very good overclocker, it runs at 1.384v, and if I'd like 4.3 stable, it requires an even higher 1.480v. Anything less gives me errors.
D
DJbehouden
02-17-2016, 04:12 AM #8

It is, but sadly not a very good overclocker, it runs at 1.384v, and if I'd like 4.3 stable, it requires an even higher 1.480v. Anything less gives me errors.

F
feryara
Member
105
02-23-2016, 12:36 AM
#9
They claim to manage higher voltage levels effectively compared to Haswell. However, I think they could have reached more customers after the initial weeks since I was really near securing the 5665c for an HTPC setup.
F
feryara
02-23-2016, 12:36 AM #9

They claim to manage higher voltage levels effectively compared to Haswell. However, I think they could have reached more customers after the initial weeks since I was really near securing the 5665c for an HTPC setup.

H
Hi_There_Pally
Junior Member
13
02-24-2016, 08:55 AM
#10
wooohH!!! you'll burst it...it's a 14nm process node it will not handle voltages ''better than haswell'' in fact it's exactly the opposite everytime they shrink the process node the chip use less and less voltages and can also systain MUCH less voltage abuse...1.3v is the max you want to go on these i think. ...and no to this as well...4.2ghz on these equals about 4.4ghz on haswell based processor.
H
Hi_There_Pally
02-24-2016, 08:55 AM #10

wooohH!!! you'll burst it...it's a 14nm process node it will not handle voltages ''better than haswell'' in fact it's exactly the opposite everytime they shrink the process node the chip use less and less voltages and can also systain MUCH less voltage abuse...1.3v is the max you want to go on these i think. ...and no to this as well...4.2ghz on these equals about 4.4ghz on haswell based processor.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next