Playing Minecraft Java Edition on a Pocket Server is possible but may have limitations compared to a full PC setup.
Playing Minecraft Java Edition on a Pocket Server is possible but may have limitations compared to a full PC setup.
its an issue where i upgraded a cpu from a fx 4350 to a 8350 and start getting bsods, format nothing works but the chip is stable in win7, win10 it isnt, update nothing works just getting bsods + windows blows up like nothing, hardware is stable and checked already
You're encountering bug checks that suggest changes in software or firmware since Windows 7 to Windows 10, causing instability on the 8350. The device likely still has a modern BIOS/UEFI, but the issue seems tied to resolving Windows 10 problems, which are the main workaround. There are no direct C++ to Java Minecraft bridges, and the C++ build is closed source, making it nearly impossible to recreate.
spread out across various issues, nothing consistent really. from 1a to system exceptions not resolved, irq page faults... just random basic stuff. since the hardware works fine and Windows 7 is stable, I’m not sure what to try in Windows 10. as soon as any Windows 10 is installed, it starts and crashes the OS within hours, which is really frustrating. I can’t do much about it except for the Gigabyte 970A D3SP and 470GTX models. I guess maybe a driver update or a pre-updated ISO would help. Hope it works smoothly. I know some FX chips had problems in Windows 10 Q-Q board, but it’s running FC BIOS now. I don’t want to flash to the firmware because of instability. There’s one unstable moment during flash and it shows a toast. What if there’s corrupt RAM or memory controller issues even though tests pass?
It's a good idea to try it. You can obtain the newest 1709 ISO directly from Microsoft. Using DISM will let you apply the latest Servicing Stack Update (KB4090914) and cumulative update (KB4093105), making sure the ISO is fully clean and secure. Starting with build 17134.5.5 on Monday will remove version 1803, so you can get the ISO at the same time or shortly thereafter.
I already have practical ISO 1803 support ready. I have the necessary contacts and access to Microsoft’s direct ISO database. I can also retrieve the latest updates from the insider build, but for now I prefer using the current release since it’s more stable for a system environment. What if 1803 encounters any problems?
I personally prefer to wait for public iso's - it's easy enough to take encrypted ESD files and build an iso from those, but there's peace of mind in using the ones Microsoft releases for general usage. I imagine 1803 probably will have issues, but it's one more option if 1709 doesn't work for you.
The differences in programming languages used for Java Edition and other editions don’t prevent compatibility. Websites built in PHP could still interact with browsers written in another language. It’s similar to assuming people can’t manage computers just because their methods differ from ours.