F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Play in ultrawide mode at 21:9 while viewing 16:9 content.

Play in ultrawide mode at 21:9 while viewing 16:9 content.

Play in ultrawide mode at 21:9 while viewing 16:9 content.

J
jamesydog
Member
193
03-25-2024, 08:05 AM
#1
I notice several comments here that remind me of what I’m about to say. I wonder if this is the kind of reply I’m expecting, or if I’m misunderstanding or bringing up a minor point. My main question is why playing on a real ultra-wide monitor would be the same as using a 2560x1080 display. A 32-inch screen with a 16:9 aspect ratio shows nearly the same size as a 34-inch one in 21:9, and a 27-inch model would likely match a 29-inch UW. I haven’t calculated that yet. After considering it more, it seems similar to Linus’s idea—play at 1920x1080 with black bars if the game doesn’t support ultra-wide. It might make sense to stick with 16:9 for a 21:9 display if you want better value. It looks like you could find a 2560x1440 32-inch monitor for around $450–500 and a 2560x1080 34-inch one at the same price.
J
jamesydog
03-25-2024, 08:05 AM #1

I notice several comments here that remind me of what I’m about to say. I wonder if this is the kind of reply I’m expecting, or if I’m misunderstanding or bringing up a minor point. My main question is why playing on a real ultra-wide monitor would be the same as using a 2560x1080 display. A 32-inch screen with a 16:9 aspect ratio shows nearly the same size as a 34-inch one in 21:9, and a 27-inch model would likely match a 29-inch UW. I haven’t calculated that yet. After considering it more, it seems similar to Linus’s idea—play at 1920x1080 with black bars if the game doesn’t support ultra-wide. It might make sense to stick with 16:9 for a 21:9 display if you want better value. It looks like you could find a 2560x1440 32-inch monitor for around $450–500 and a 2560x1080 34-inch one at the same price.

B
Butterfly1416
Senior Member
701
03-25-2024, 04:40 PM
#2
A 31-inch 1440p display running at 2560x1080 would roughly match a 27-inch 2560x1080 screen.
B
Butterfly1416
03-25-2024, 04:40 PM #2

A 31-inch 1440p display running at 2560x1080 would roughly match a 27-inch 2560x1080 screen.

G
Guinucool
Member
67
03-25-2024, 11:24 PM
#3
It looks like a 32" 16:9 aspect ratio is slightly smaller than a 21:9 29" one.
G
Guinucool
03-25-2024, 11:24 PM #3

It looks like a 32" 16:9 aspect ratio is slightly smaller than a 21:9 29" one.

K
Kaine13
Member
100
03-26-2024, 02:36 AM
#4
This doesn't make sense. You wouldn't want to trim one-fourth of the screen just to achieve that ratio. 21:9 exists for a specific purpose, not because of arbitrary measurements.
K
Kaine13
03-26-2024, 02:36 AM #4

This doesn't make sense. You wouldn't want to trim one-fourth of the screen just to achieve that ratio. 21:9 exists for a specific purpose, not because of arbitrary measurements.