F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Play controls for Witcher 3.

Play controls for Witcher 3.

Play controls for Witcher 3.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
C
castillo_
Junior Member
43
03-05-2016, 08:59 AM
#1
Hey there, so I just started playing TW3 and spent about an hour getting used to it. The KBM controls feel a bit awkward, though I usually prefer using a keyboard. I’ve seen some discussions about control changes online—anyone have a handy list of recommended settings? Or is this game really meant for controllers? Also, with 290x crossfire, I’m usually around 45-55fps on ultra at 1080p. That seems pretty stable, right? Is it normal for the game to run smoothly under those conditions?
C
castillo_
03-05-2016, 08:59 AM #1

Hey there, so I just started playing TW3 and spent about an hour getting used to it. The KBM controls feel a bit awkward, though I usually prefer using a keyboard. I’ve seen some discussions about control changes online—anyone have a handy list of recommended settings? Or is this game really meant for controllers? Also, with 290x crossfire, I’m usually around 45-55fps on ultra at 1080p. That seems pretty stable, right? Is it normal for the game to run smoothly under those conditions?

S
stamkiller
Member
51
03-11-2016, 06:36 AM
#2
The alternative control method you're referring to improves character responsiveness significantly. Running the game is still challenging, but you can use both keyboard and mouse without any problems.
S
stamkiller
03-11-2016, 06:36 AM #2

The alternative control method you're referring to improves character responsiveness significantly. Running the game is still challenging, but you can use both keyboard and mouse without any problems.

G
GK_Wolves_15
Member
161
03-11-2016, 09:14 AM
#3
This game is quite challenging to play, particularly when hair effects are active. Still, I strongly suggest using a controller. I tested it with an X360 controller and found the controls to be extremely responsive.
G
GK_Wolves_15
03-11-2016, 09:14 AM #3

This game is quite challenging to play, particularly when hair effects are active. Still, I strongly suggest using a controller. I tested it with an X360 controller and found the controls to be extremely responsive.

E
EisTeeKlaus
Senior Member
490
03-11-2016, 11:37 PM
#4
I choose the controller. It feels much improved unless you're competing in FPS games, etc.
E
EisTeeKlaus
03-11-2016, 11:37 PM #4

I choose the controller. It feels much improved unless you're competing in FPS games, etc.

B
Beny8000
Member
205
03-13-2016, 11:43 AM
#5
I finished the game using just kb+m and performed well overall, though results vary by taste. Witcher 3 remains enjoyable when played with a controller.
B
Beny8000
03-13-2016, 11:43 AM #5

I finished the game using just kb+m and performed well overall, though results vary by taste. Witcher 3 remains enjoyable when played with a controller.

R
RamboPvPz
Member
50
03-13-2016, 01:19 PM
#6
I completely support @werto165’s choice of the new movement style. I mostly played without it until the latest patch, but it really improved the game’s look and feel. I don’t think a controller is necessary here. Having played games on consoles from the PS1 to PS4, I’m used to controlling with a keyboard and mouse. Even on PC, Skyrim was more enjoyable with the controller than using a keyboard and mouse. For Witcher 3, making a few tweaks like sprint toggle and potion slots helped me adapt quickly. Recently I’ve been playing on my brother’s PS4, but it feels a bit more frustrating in combat. Overall, the controller works well for me now.
R
RamboPvPz
03-13-2016, 01:19 PM #6

I completely support @werto165’s choice of the new movement style. I mostly played without it until the latest patch, but it really improved the game’s look and feel. I don’t think a controller is necessary here. Having played games on consoles from the PS1 to PS4, I’m used to controlling with a keyboard and mouse. Even on PC, Skyrim was more enjoyable with the controller than using a keyboard and mouse. For Witcher 3, making a few tweaks like sprint toggle and potion slots helped me adapt quickly. Recently I’ve been playing on my brother’s PS4, but it feels a bit more frustrating in combat. Overall, the controller works well for me now.

C
CaptainPrice_
Junior Member
48
03-13-2016, 09:45 PM
#7
I enjoy working with both platforms. With my 970, I achieve around 40 to 60 frames per second on ultra 1080P in Hairworks.
C
CaptainPrice_
03-13-2016, 09:45 PM #7

I enjoy working with both platforms. With my 970, I achieve around 40 to 60 frames per second on ultra 1080P in Hairworks.

X
xLakes
Member
105
03-14-2016, 07:51 PM
#8
It's surprising how low the frame rates feel even with high-end graphics cards. Your R9 270 should handle 30-40 FPS on Ultra, but performance can drop due to settings, load times, or other factors.
X
xLakes
03-14-2016, 07:51 PM #8

It's surprising how low the frame rates feel even with high-end graphics cards. Your R9 270 should handle 30-40 FPS on Ultra, but performance can drop due to settings, load times, or other factors.

J
Jorski
Member
219
03-15-2016, 04:29 AM
#9
Sure, I'll try the alternative style this Sunday when I'm back. Also, it's a bit unclear about the frame rate—2,290 frames per second should definitely handle 1080p smoothly.
J
Jorski
03-15-2016, 04:29 AM #9

Sure, I'll try the alternative style this Sunday when I'm back. Also, it's a bit unclear about the frame rate—2,290 frames per second should definitely handle 1080p smoothly.

M
magnusqf
Junior Member
12
03-15-2016, 05:42 AM
#10
On AMD TW3 you're seeing poor optimization lately. With a 970 SLI setup I maintain steady 60 fps, and at 1440p I should reach solid 45+ performance as long as the effects don’t get too intense with big battles or sunsets.
M
magnusqf
03-15-2016, 05:42 AM #10

On AMD TW3 you're seeing poor optimization lately. With a 970 SLI setup I maintain steady 60 fps, and at 1440p I should reach solid 45+ performance as long as the effects don’t get too intense with big battles or sunsets.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next