F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Performance remains minimal, consistently under 70% utilization.

Performance remains minimal, consistently under 70% utilization.

Performance remains minimal, consistently under 70% utilization.

A
alex4max
Member
Find
72
10-08-2016, 10:34 AM
#1
I’m noticing low performance in most games, with the CPU rarely reaching 80% and the GPU below 65%. This means I’m missing a lot of frames per second, even though my numbers seem high. People in chat said this is unusual. If you can help, when I increased the resolution to 200% on BF5, FPS fell to 50-60, CPU usage dropped to 40-50%, and GPU usage reached 75%. I’m unsure where the issue lies. I’ve tested both SSD and HDD, but frame rates stayed consistent, so the problem isn’t there. I’ve shared my specs and a hardware log for reference. My power supply is a CORSAIR RMX White Series (2018), and I’m using the Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB RAM. I also changed all settings to max performance on the NVIDIA panel, but frame rates haven’t improved much. I’m also using an overclocked CPU and default one, yet performance remains unchanged. The PSU is rated 750W and certified 80+ Gold. I’m still unsure about the bottleneck.
Reply
Reply
A
alex4max
10-08-2016, 10:34 AM #1

I’m noticing low performance in most games, with the CPU rarely reaching 80% and the GPU below 65%. This means I’m missing a lot of frames per second, even though my numbers seem high. People in chat said this is unusual. If you can help, when I increased the resolution to 200% on BF5, FPS fell to 50-60, CPU usage dropped to 40-50%, and GPU usage reached 75%. I’m unsure where the issue lies. I’ve tested both SSD and HDD, but frame rates stayed consistent, so the problem isn’t there. I’ve shared my specs and a hardware log for reference. My power supply is a CORSAIR RMX White Series (2018), and I’m using the Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB RAM. I also changed all settings to max performance on the NVIDIA panel, but frame rates haven’t improved much. I’m also using an overclocked CPU and default one, yet performance remains unchanged. The PSU is rated 750W and certified 80+ Gold. I’m still unsure about the bottleneck.

Reply
Reply
A
Atnikei
Junior Member
Find
42
10-08-2016, 12:13 PM
#2
You essentially created a 1440P/4K gaming setup. The card isn't really strained with 1080P. Perhaps a monitor upgrade would meet your needs and enhance the visual quality.
Reply
Reply
A
Atnikei
10-08-2016, 12:13 PM #2

You essentially created a 1440P/4K gaming setup. The card isn't really strained with 1080P. Perhaps a monitor upgrade would meet your needs and enhance the visual quality.

Reply
Reply
D
DarkBoy__YT
Posting Freak
Find
898
10-10-2016, 08:08 AM
#3
If that were the situation, why am I not achieving 300+ frames per second?
Reply
Reply
D
DarkBoy__YT
10-10-2016, 08:08 AM #3

If that were the situation, why am I not achieving 300+ frames per second?

Reply
Reply
B
BruceJH
Member
Find
173
10-12-2016, 01:04 PM
#4
The score you've shared is clear and concise. It confirms that the FurMark score has been posted successfully.
Reply
Reply
B
BruceJH
10-12-2016, 01:04 PM #4

The score you've shared is clear and concise. It confirms that the FurMark score has been posted successfully.

Reply
Reply
P
pmannarwhal
Junior Member
Find
16
10-12-2016, 05:42 PM
#5
I’m not sure about that number either, but I’m aware FurMark is a tough benchmark for GPUs.
Reply
Reply
P
pmannarwhal
10-12-2016, 05:42 PM #5

I’m not sure about that number either, but I’m aware FurMark is a tough benchmark for GPUs.

Reply
Reply