F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Performance of Ddr5 dual rank technology

Performance of Ddr5 dual rank technology

Performance of Ddr5 dual rank technology

H
helenma0301
Senior Member
250
09-18-2021, 02:15 PM
#1
Check the RAM specifications for both DDR4 and DDR5 models. Look for terms like "single channel" or "dual channel" in the documentation. You can also refer to manufacturer websites or technical manuals for confirmation.
H
helenma0301
09-18-2021, 02:15 PM #1

Check the RAM specifications for both DDR4 and DDR5 models. Look for terms like "single channel" or "dual channel" in the documentation. You can also refer to manufacturer websites or technical manuals for confirmation.

M
Mario_512
Member
163
09-24-2021, 08:14 PM
#2
Review the specifications listed on the product sheet. Kingston typically provides this information there. For instance, 1Rx8 means a single-rank 8GB DIMM, whereas a dual-rank 8GB DIMM would be labeled 2Rx8.
M
Mario_512
09-24-2021, 08:14 PM #2

Review the specifications listed on the product sheet. Kingston typically provides this information there. For instance, 1Rx8 means a single-rank 8GB DIMM, whereas a dual-rank 8GB DIMM would be labeled 2Rx8.

M
MrT1mkaLP
Junior Member
46
09-24-2021, 09:46 PM
#3
DDR5 basics are straightforward: For sticks under 16GB (except the older 8GB models that pretend to be DDR5), it's single rank. A 32GB model is dual rank, though this could shift later. Rank becomes less important because DDR5’s speed is high enough that ranking changes don’t really help performance. Dual rank mainly adds extra load on the memory controller. With DDR4, things are a bit more straightforward. An 8GB stick from the last 4-5 years is single rank; a 32GB one is dual rank. The tricky part comes with 16GB sticks—most are uncertain about their ranking, but certain memory types are clearly defined. For example, a 32GB kit labeled ~4400MHz CL19-26-26-48 is automatically considered dual rank, just like 3200MHz CL14 from Samsung. Any other configuration can hold either 8GB or 16GB per rank.
M
MrT1mkaLP
09-24-2021, 09:46 PM #3

DDR5 basics are straightforward: For sticks under 16GB (except the older 8GB models that pretend to be DDR5), it's single rank. A 32GB model is dual rank, though this could shift later. Rank becomes less important because DDR5’s speed is high enough that ranking changes don’t really help performance. Dual rank mainly adds extra load on the memory controller. With DDR4, things are a bit more straightforward. An 8GB stick from the last 4-5 years is single rank; a 32GB one is dual rank. The tricky part comes with 16GB sticks—most are uncertain about their ranking, but certain memory types are clearly defined. For example, a 32GB kit labeled ~4400MHz CL19-26-26-48 is automatically considered dual rank, just like 3200MHz CL14 from Samsung. Any other configuration can hold either 8GB or 16GB per rank.

T
Turtle02536
Junior Member
22
09-25-2021, 12:40 AM
#4
They claim that RAM producers don't indicate whether it's single or dual rank anymore.
T
Turtle02536
09-25-2021, 12:40 AM #4

They claim that RAM producers don't indicate whether it's single or dual rank anymore.

1
11wyatts
Junior Member
33
09-26-2021, 03:11 AM
#5
Are there any RAM brands offering dual-rank 16 GB DDR5? I was expecting only 32 GB DDR5 units to be dual-rank until recently, but they’re quite costly. I’m looking for a manufacturer that supplies 16 GB dual-rank DDR5, which would cut the price in half. Thanks!
1
11wyatts
09-26-2021, 03:11 AM #5

Are there any RAM brands offering dual-rank 16 GB DDR5? I was expecting only 32 GB DDR5 units to be dual-rank until recently, but they’re quite costly. I’m looking for a manufacturer that supplies 16 GB dual-rank DDR5, which would cut the price in half. Thanks!

T
Topsie_Cow
Junior Member
15
09-27-2021, 02:15 PM
#6
They've developed a method to pack two gigabytes into one chip instead of one per die, reducing silicon costs by half while keeping the same number of dies needed for dual-level performance.
T
Topsie_Cow
09-27-2021, 02:15 PM #6

They've developed a method to pack two gigabytes into one chip instead of one per die, reducing silicon costs by half while keeping the same number of dies needed for dual-level performance.

M
Mr_FreiZzen
Junior Member
21
09-27-2021, 03:57 PM
#7
Great response! Thanks for your kind words.
M
Mr_FreiZzen
09-27-2021, 03:57 PM #7

Great response! Thanks for your kind words.

C
Creeperman3
Senior Member
454
09-28-2021, 12:15 AM
#8
I discovered that to get DDR5 dual rank I need either a 2×32 or 4×8 configuration. That’s going to be really costly. Before I start building, I want to understand the performance boost from a dual rank setup versus a single rank one of each size. Will the improvement worth the price? Updated April 29, 2022 by Achilles777
C
Creeperman3
09-28-2021, 12:15 AM #8

I discovered that to get DDR5 dual rank I need either a 2×32 or 4×8 configuration. That’s going to be really costly. Before I start building, I want to understand the performance boost from a dual rank setup versus a single rank one of each size. Will the improvement worth the price? Updated April 29, 2022 by Achilles777

K
KawaiiChan22
Junior Member
6
10-16-2021, 10:03 AM
#9
Hey everyone, I began checking the 1 vs 2 ranking in DDR5 after running some tests on an Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 laptop. The performance with 2x32GB was significantly better than... What I expected? I wasn’t surprised at all. I’ve been doing repeated benchmarks for two days, swapping the sticks. It’s not finished yet, but I hope this clears things up.
K
KawaiiChan22
10-16-2021, 10:03 AM #9

Hey everyone, I began checking the 1 vs 2 ranking in DDR5 after running some tests on an Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 laptop. The performance with 2x32GB was significantly better than... What I expected? I wasn’t surprised at all. I’ve been doing repeated benchmarks for two days, swapping the sticks. It’s not finished yet, but I hope this clears things up.