F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Performance of 10Gb connections

Performance of 10Gb connections

Performance of 10Gb connections

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
M
Mr_Floobiful
Posting Freak
890
06-26-2023, 07:29 AM
#11
The discussion focuses on storage speeds and their impact on network performance. It highlights typical HDD speeds and the challenges of using them to fully utilize a high-bandwidth SATA connection. The conversation also touches on NAS setups, drive counts, and whether modern 10G cards can handle the required data flow.
M
Mr_Floobiful
06-26-2023, 07:29 AM #11

The discussion focuses on storage speeds and their impact on network performance. It highlights typical HDD speeds and the challenges of using them to fully utilize a high-bandwidth SATA connection. The conversation also touches on NAS setups, drive counts, and whether modern 10G cards can handle the required data flow.

B
Biz_Bionicz
Junior Member
8
06-27-2023, 05:56 AM
#12
It is handled effectively. Our setup includes Synology RS3617RPxs with 20,000 Mbps and eight 4TB drives.
B
Biz_Bionicz
06-27-2023, 05:56 AM #12

It is handled effectively. Our setup includes Synology RS3617RPxs with 20,000 Mbps and eight 4TB drives.

W
WF_Catt
Posting Freak
761
06-27-2023, 01:05 PM
#13
Have you experimented with another cable? Do the 10G cards overheat?
W
WF_Catt
06-27-2023, 01:05 PM #13

Have you experimented with another cable? Do the 10G cards overheat?

G
GETSOU
Member
220
06-30-2023, 01:42 PM
#14
We have two NAS units that match the specifications and they run efficiently without overheating.
G
GETSOU
06-30-2023, 01:42 PM #14

We have two NAS units that match the specifications and they run efficiently without overheating.

R
renel2000
Junior Member
6
06-30-2023, 07:26 PM
#15
Reviewing the iPerf data, your subnets are visible. If you adjusted the mask to /23, that means you're using routing instead of switching.
R
renel2000
06-30-2023, 07:26 PM #15

Reviewing the iPerf data, your subnets are visible. If you adjusted the mask to /23, that means you're using routing instead of switching.

E
EndermanMan18
Senior Member
250
07-01-2023, 01:17 PM
#16
Catch well. Consider combining your NAS and computer on the same network segment.
E
EndermanMan18
07-01-2023, 01:17 PM #16

Catch well. Consider combining your NAS and computer on the same network segment.

S
SupComCrafter
Member
243
07-03-2023, 06:29 AM
#17
We used a /22 network because the address count required then. Note: All devices such as servers, switches, and DHCP servers are now set to 192.168.1.X instead of 192.168.0.X.
S
SupComCrafter
07-03-2023, 06:29 AM #17

We used a /22 network because the address count required then. Note: All devices such as servers, switches, and DHCP servers are now set to 192.168.1.X instead of 192.168.0.X.

A
Armandodark
Member
186
07-10-2023, 08:34 PM
#18
You'll also need to increase the parallel streams for 10 gigabits. The command should be -P [#]. Start with 5 or 10 streams and see how it goes.
A
Armandodark
07-10-2023, 08:34 PM #18

You'll also need to increase the parallel streams for 10 gigabits. The command should be -P [#]. Start with 5 or 10 streams and see how it goes.

S
SwampyJoe55
Member
61
07-10-2023, 08:55 PM
#19
At parallel streams version 10, the system handles up to 10G.
S
SwampyJoe55
07-10-2023, 08:55 PM #19

At parallel streams version 10, the system handles up to 10G.

T
theMSminer
Member
54
07-12-2023, 09:14 AM
#20
The issue is resolved.
T
theMSminer
07-12-2023, 09:14 AM #20

The issue is resolved.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next