F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Performance issues with OC Reduced (FX-6300)?

Performance issues with OC Reduced (FX-6300)?

Performance issues with OC Reduced (FX-6300)?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
K
KawiianMili
Posting Freak
786
05-07-2016, 03:31 AM
#1
I increased my century-old FX-6300 from stock to 3.7GHz but faced thermal issues. After checking Cinebench R23 MultiCore results, the stock setup scored higher (2000 vs 2210). I’m aiming for decent performance in Apex, so I considered overclocking. Should I go back to the original settings or try a better cooler and further overclock? I don’t want to spend more on RAM unless it really improves things—my current setup has an 1866MHz 8GB RAM and is already slow. The GPU is GTX 960 with 2GB at 3900MHz, plus 1230 CoreBase and 1500 CoreBoost.
K
KawiianMili
05-07-2016, 03:31 AM #1

I increased my century-old FX-6300 from stock to 3.7GHz but faced thermal issues. After checking Cinebench R23 MultiCore results, the stock setup scored higher (2000 vs 2210). I’m aiming for decent performance in Apex, so I considered overclocking. Should I go back to the original settings or try a better cooler and further overclock? I don’t want to spend more on RAM unless it really improves things—my current setup has an 1866MHz 8GB RAM and is already slow. The GPU is GTX 960 with 2GB at 3900MHz, plus 1230 CoreBase and 1500 CoreBoost.

Z
zStorM_aus
Junior Member
13
05-07-2016, 11:28 AM
#2
Rgd1101 is one of the top options available here on TH.
Most other responders will advise you to avoid spending more on a dead platform.
As you know, a solid cooler is essential for overclocking, no matter the system.
When it was set to 3.7ghz, it reached the turbo/boost clock of 3.8ghz, which means performance drops compared to stock due to insufficient cooling.
You should stick to the original or choose a cooler that can be upgraded for better value.
For clarity and comparison, here’s a quick snapshot from your setup:
FX6300 to my wife's Ryzen 2600x watercooled on a X470 motherboard with 16GB G.Skill Flare X3200 CL14, paired with a GTX 960 4GB.
Z
zStorM_aus
05-07-2016, 11:28 AM #2

Rgd1101 is one of the top options available here on TH.
Most other responders will advise you to avoid spending more on a dead platform.
As you know, a solid cooler is essential for overclocking, no matter the system.
When it was set to 3.7ghz, it reached the turbo/boost clock of 3.8ghz, which means performance drops compared to stock due to insufficient cooling.
You should stick to the original or choose a cooler that can be upgraded for better value.
For clarity and comparison, here’s a quick snapshot from your setup:
FX6300 to my wife's Ryzen 2600x watercooled on a X470 motherboard with 16GB G.Skill Flare X3200 CL14, paired with a GTX 960 4GB.

A
AlexZBeast
Member
119
05-07-2016, 01:02 PM
#3
I would cease spending money on this
A
AlexZBeast
05-07-2016, 01:02 PM #3

I would cease spending money on this

T
TotalGamer144
Member
180
05-08-2016, 01:24 PM
#4
Rgd1101 is among the top choices here on TH. Most other responders will advise you to avoid spending more on a dead platform. You definitely need a reliable cooler for overclocking, regardless of the platform. When it was set to 3.7ghz, it reached the turbo/boost clock of 3.8ghz, which suggests a performance drop compared to stock due to insufficient cooling. It makes sense to stick with the original or opt for a cooler that can be upgraded for better value.

Just for reference, here are some benchmark results from your setup:

- FX6300 to my wife's Ryzen 2600x watercooled on X470 motherboard with 16GB G.Skill Flare X3200 CL14 and GTX 960 4GB
- Running Cbr23 7686 multi-core and 1047 single-core
- Xfr2 enabled: Extended frequency Range
- Unigene Heaven 4.0 benchmark on GPU 1493MHz, 3742MB RAM, with 4x anti-aliasing
- Medium settings + 4x anti-aliasing: 63.6 FPS, score 1601
- Min FPS 13.3, Max FPS 122.5
- High settings + 4x anti-aliasing: 56.9 FPS, score 1434
- Min FPS 31.1, Max FPS 112.9
- Ultra setting: 4x anti-aliasing
- FPS 52.6, score 1325
- Min FPS 29.8, Max FPS 102.8

Your GPU doesn’t require much power. It’s not a gamer, but it will handle the GTX 1070 Ti when I upgrade next year. Hope this helps and have a great holiday season!
T
TotalGamer144
05-08-2016, 01:24 PM #4

Rgd1101 is among the top choices here on TH. Most other responders will advise you to avoid spending more on a dead platform. You definitely need a reliable cooler for overclocking, regardless of the platform. When it was set to 3.7ghz, it reached the turbo/boost clock of 3.8ghz, which suggests a performance drop compared to stock due to insufficient cooling. It makes sense to stick with the original or opt for a cooler that can be upgraded for better value.

Just for reference, here are some benchmark results from your setup:

- FX6300 to my wife's Ryzen 2600x watercooled on X470 motherboard with 16GB G.Skill Flare X3200 CL14 and GTX 960 4GB
- Running Cbr23 7686 multi-core and 1047 single-core
- Xfr2 enabled: Extended frequency Range
- Unigene Heaven 4.0 benchmark on GPU 1493MHz, 3742MB RAM, with 4x anti-aliasing
- Medium settings + 4x anti-aliasing: 63.6 FPS, score 1601
- Min FPS 13.3, Max FPS 122.5
- High settings + 4x anti-aliasing: 56.9 FPS, score 1434
- Min FPS 31.1, Max FPS 112.9
- Ultra setting: 4x anti-aliasing
- FPS 52.6, score 1325
- Min FPS 29.8, Max FPS 102.8

Your GPU doesn’t require much power. It’s not a gamer, but it will handle the GTX 1070 Ti when I upgrade next year. Hope this helps and have a great holiday season!

U
UnicornWuver
Member
193
05-09-2016, 05:30 AM
#5
There really isn't much you can do to reach 20 FPS more. If you're already at 60 FPS, a 20 FPS increase would be a 33% improvement, which isn't something you'd want for an overclock. It's not worth spending on a better cooler, and we still don't know if your motherboard is suitable for this. Cheap AM3+ boards aren't ideal for overclocking.
U
UnicornWuver
05-09-2016, 05:30 AM #5

There really isn't much you can do to reach 20 FPS more. If you're already at 60 FPS, a 20 FPS increase would be a 33% improvement, which isn't something you'd want for an overclock. It's not worth spending on a better cooler, and we still don't know if your motherboard is suitable for this. Cheap AM3+ boards aren't ideal for overclocking.

G
GhostyLite
Member
238
05-09-2016, 06:29 AM
#6
I generally see around 25-30 frames per action and 110 frames when watching the sky. This platform is known for its high overclocking capability up to 4.5GHz. Will that improve my frame rate? Is the CPU limiting performance, or should I consider other upgrades?
G
GhostyLite
05-09-2016, 06:29 AM #6

I generally see around 25-30 frames per action and 110 frames when watching the sky. This platform is known for its high overclocking capability up to 4.5GHz. Will that improve my frame rate? Is the CPU limiting performance, or should I consider other upgrades?

_
_FreeZe_YT_
Member
145
05-12-2016, 06:57 AM
#7
What improvements would you recommend? I can purchase a reasonably affordable and durable cooler for around 20 USD, which should bring my GPU up to at least 4.2GHz. Will that really increase my FPS? I'm also excited about playing Cyberpunk, which runs smoothly at 25-35 FPS on other systems with similar specs, but I only get about 9 FPS here. My goal is to identify the specific bottleneck causing this difference.
_
_FreeZe_YT_
05-12-2016, 06:57 AM #7

What improvements would you recommend? I can purchase a reasonably affordable and durable cooler for around 20 USD, which should bring my GPU up to at least 4.2GHz. Will that really increase my FPS? I'm also excited about playing Cyberpunk, which runs smoothly at 25-35 FPS on other systems with similar specs, but I only get about 9 FPS here. My goal is to identify the specific bottleneck causing this difference.

T
tfarcenim1025
Junior Member
16
05-31-2016, 03:21 AM
#8
You'll receive several frames, but this CPU struggled during its launch in 2012. The main issue is the processor itself. For Cyberpunk, the situation is even more critical; it falls short of the required specifications for smooth play at 1080p on both CPU and GPU. The system is significantly underpowered for modern gaming, and to achieve higher frame rates would demand a much larger upgrade. Adding a cheap cooler to slightly boost performance might allow you to count frames with one hand, leaving some room in your fingers.
T
tfarcenim1025
05-31-2016, 03:21 AM #8

You'll receive several frames, but this CPU struggled during its launch in 2012. The main issue is the processor itself. For Cyberpunk, the situation is even more critical; it falls short of the required specifications for smooth play at 1080p on both CPU and GPU. The system is significantly underpowered for modern gaming, and to achieve higher frame rates would demand a much larger upgrade. Adding a cheap cooler to slightly boost performance might allow you to count frames with one hand, leaving some room in your fingers.

N
Neno820
Junior Member
46
05-31-2016, 09:06 AM
#9
What kind of motherboard is this?
Overclocking causes performance drops, with the 6300 throttling at certain points. It might also slow down at normal speeds. The variation in frame rates between different scenes suggests GPU constraints rather than CPU issues. Even at stock settings, the 6300 can exceed 30fps in Apex.
N
Neno820
05-31-2016, 09:06 AM #9

What kind of motherboard is this?
Overclocking causes performance drops, with the 6300 throttling at certain points. It might also slow down at normal speeds. The variation in frame rates between different scenes suggests GPU constraints rather than CPU issues. Even at stock settings, the 6300 can exceed 30fps in Apex.

M
Max846
Senior Member
474
05-31-2016, 04:50 PM
#10
You've caught their focus on TH, and with that in mind, I'll guide you accordingly.
M
Max846
05-31-2016, 04:50 PM #10

You've caught their focus on TH, and with that in mind, I'll guide you accordingly.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next