F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Performance issue due to high CPU usage

Performance issue due to high CPU usage

Performance issue due to high CPU usage

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
F
Frigiel21
Member
187
10-18-2016, 10:58 AM
#1
I just noticed a major CPU bottleneck on my system. This is the first time I've seen something like this. The CPU was at 100% usage, GPU at around 1%, and I was getting only 7-10 FPS on average. If you're curious: CPU is an Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 running at 1.4GHz, motherboard is ASUS P5LD2-X, RAM is Kingston 2*2GB DDR2 800MHz, GPU is Sapphire Radeon R9 280X, and I'm running Windows 10 Home 64-bit with GTA V settings at 1920x1080, MSAA enabled, X2 anti-aliasing, X16 resolution.
F
Frigiel21
10-18-2016, 10:58 AM #1

I just noticed a major CPU bottleneck on my system. This is the first time I've seen something like this. The CPU was at 100% usage, GPU at around 1%, and I was getting only 7-10 FPS on average. If you're curious: CPU is an Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 running at 1.4GHz, motherboard is ASUS P5LD2-X, RAM is Kingston 2*2GB DDR2 800MHz, GPU is Sapphire Radeon R9 280X, and I'm running Windows 10 Home 64-bit with GTA V settings at 1920x1080, MSAA enabled, X2 anti-aliasing, X16 resolution.

J
JacobLouis30
Posting Freak
856
10-18-2016, 08:58 PM
#2
Start with a lower setting to achieve around 30 frames per second.
J
JacobLouis30
10-18-2016, 08:58 PM #2

Start with a lower setting to achieve around 30 frames per second.

B
burnmaster25
Junior Member
42
11-03-2016, 12:12 AM
#3
I did it just for fun to check how a 2007 dual-core CPU performs under these conditions.
B
burnmaster25
11-03-2016, 12:12 AM #3

I did it just for fun to check how a 2007 dual-core CPU performs under these conditions.

N
nessie22
Member
58
11-05-2016, 07:53 AM
#4
Similar to upgrading a CPU, you can find more options at this link: https://www.amazon.com/Intel-Extreme-Qua...B00143O62K
N
nessie22
11-05-2016, 07:53 AM #4

Similar to upgrading a CPU, you can find more options at this link: https://www.amazon.com/Intel-Extreme-Qua...B00143O62K

R
ReservedSnake4
Junior Member
11
11-05-2016, 08:07 AM
#5
It performs reasonably without CPU overclocking. A fully loaded E6550 likely remains a performance constraint for a 280X, though not as extreme as some other configurations. You’d probably still need a strong CPU like a Core 2 Quad to get the most out of that GPU in GTA V.
R
ReservedSnake4
11-05-2016, 08:07 AM #5

It performs reasonably without CPU overclocking. A fully loaded E6550 likely remains a performance constraint for a 280X, though not as extreme as some other configurations. You’d probably still need a strong CPU like a Core 2 Quad to get the most out of that GPU in GTA V.

T
TheTivekas
Member
194
11-06-2016, 02:48 AM
#6
The motherboard isn't working well—it limits the FSB speed to under 800 MHz. The E6550 at its default clock would run faster, possibly reaching around 20 FPS. A Q9650 or Xeon X5450 would perform better than these Core 2 Duos. The Xeon X5450 can handle a R9 280X in GTA V. I own that CPU. Here are the results using the Xeon X5450, which matches the performance of a Core 2 Quad Q9650.
T
TheTivekas
11-06-2016, 02:48 AM #6

The motherboard isn't working well—it limits the FSB speed to under 800 MHz. The E6550 at its default clock would run faster, possibly reaching around 20 FPS. A Q9650 or Xeon X5450 would perform better than these Core 2 Duos. The Xeon X5450 can handle a R9 280X in GTA V. I own that CPU. Here are the results using the Xeon X5450, which matches the performance of a Core 2 Quad Q9650.

C
Chiller9592
Senior Member
670
11-08-2016, 02:30 AM
#7
Most CPUs can become performance limits, especially with older cores or Xeon models in gaming setups today. I suspect adjusting the 7950x3D to a 1c/2t and limiting the multiplier would yield outcomes comparable to using an RTX 4090. Running Windows 10 on a dual-core or 1.4GHz processor will be extremely frustrating, no matter what game you're running.
C
Chiller9592
11-08-2016, 02:30 AM #7

Most CPUs can become performance limits, especially with older cores or Xeon models in gaming setups today. I suspect adjusting the 7950x3D to a 1c/2t and limiting the multiplier would yield outcomes comparable to using an RTX 4090. Running Windows 10 on a dual-core or 1.4GHz processor will be extremely frustrating, no matter what game you're running.

O
Okunino
Posting Freak
845
11-09-2016, 11:55 AM
#8
CPU is an Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 operating at 1.4GHz. It’s no wonder it’s disappointing—it’s even newer than GTA5 and was already struggling when it launched...
O
Okunino
11-09-2016, 11:55 AM #8

CPU is an Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 operating at 1.4GHz. It’s no wonder it’s disappointing—it’s even newer than GTA5 and was already struggling when it launched...

W
walee123
Senior Member
737
11-10-2016, 12:16 PM
#9
The processor is merely sluggish; these two-core units are no longer efficient. Try to find an affordable quad-core option that fits your setup and see if it resolves the problem. A Q9650 could significantly improve performance, but I’d look into buying a used Ivy Bridge quad-core i5 or i7 desktop on eBay—such as a full-size OptiPlex machine—as they can handle even the top-core 2 quads.
W
walee123
11-10-2016, 12:16 PM #9

The processor is merely sluggish; these two-core units are no longer efficient. Try to find an affordable quad-core option that fits your setup and see if it resolves the problem. A Q9650 could significantly improve performance, but I’d look into buying a used Ivy Bridge quad-core i5 or i7 desktop on eBay—such as a full-size OptiPlex machine—as they can handle even the top-core 2 quads.

R
Rylox44
Member
53
11-13-2016, 04:36 PM
#10
Unless your rig uses a DDR3 or a 4-slot DDR2 board (which supports minimum 333fsb for the BSEL Q6600), an LGA775 chipset is outdated. Unless you acquire it for free, it doesn’t make sense on a tight budget with affordable H55/P55 + i5 750/760 or X3440/50 options that offer better performance and reliability. You’ll get more IPC and better thermal management for the Xeons or i7, plus you won’t hit RAM limits. Some older boards may struggle above 200fsb, but MSI is still the best choice for optimized uncore at around 3800 MHz. However, many of these chips fail quickly after a power cut or when trying to fix BIOS/OC settings, which explains why newcomers often get confused about OC stability.
R
Rylox44
11-13-2016, 04:36 PM #10

Unless your rig uses a DDR3 or a 4-slot DDR2 board (which supports minimum 333fsb for the BSEL Q6600), an LGA775 chipset is outdated. Unless you acquire it for free, it doesn’t make sense on a tight budget with affordable H55/P55 + i5 750/760 or X3440/50 options that offer better performance and reliability. You’ll get more IPC and better thermal management for the Xeons or i7, plus you won’t hit RAM limits. Some older boards may struggle above 200fsb, but MSI is still the best choice for optimized uncore at around 3800 MHz. However, many of these chips fail quickly after a power cut or when trying to fix BIOS/OC settings, which explains why newcomers often get confused about OC stability.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next