F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Perfect stability with continuous overclocking on I7-4790K

Perfect stability with continuous overclocking on I7-4790K

Perfect stability with continuous overclocking on I7-4790K

N
Nightwolf_C
Member
107
03-20-2016, 06:14 PM
#1
Hey there! You're looking to upgrade from your K i7-4790 to the K version and diving into overclocking. Since you're CPU bottlenecked, aim for a stable clock speed that delivers top performance. For your AsRock Z97 Pro3, target around 4.6 GHz or higher depending on your motherboard's support. Voltage should match your motherboard's recommended range—typically 1.8V to 1.9V for most K series. Keep the cache speed as it is unless you're certain it won't affect stability. Just stay consistent and monitor temperatures closely.
N
Nightwolf_C
03-20-2016, 06:14 PM #1

Hey there! You're looking to upgrade from your K i7-4790 to the K version and diving into overclocking. Since you're CPU bottlenecked, aim for a stable clock speed that delivers top performance. For your AsRock Z97 Pro3, target around 4.6 GHz or higher depending on your motherboard's support. Voltage should match your motherboard's recommended range—typically 1.8V to 1.9V for most K series. Keep the cache speed as it is unless you're certain it won't affect stability. Just stay consistent and monitor temperatures closely.

A
Akhylys
Member
53
03-20-2016, 08:15 PM
#2
The 4790K is an older chip; even after overclocking, you're likely still limited by your CPU. How much you can push depends on your motherboard's power delivery and your luck with the silicon. Begin with configurations others have found reliable. If it works, increase slightly and rerun a stability test. If it fails, reduce gradually until stable settings emerge.
A
Akhylys
03-20-2016, 08:15 PM #2

The 4790K is an older chip; even after overclocking, you're likely still limited by your CPU. How much you can push depends on your motherboard's power delivery and your luck with the silicon. Begin with configurations others have found reliable. If it works, increase slightly and rerun a stability test. If it fails, reduce gradually until stable settings emerge.

R
RG48
Posting Freak
778
04-03-2016, 06:37 PM
#3
Confirmed. After nine years with the 4790K, I upgraded to a 7800X3D since 4C/8T consistently limited performance in most titles requiring over 99% CPU usage. While some games only reached 60% GPU utilization (1080Ti), most exceeded the four-core threshold needed for optimal gaming.
R
RG48
04-03-2016, 06:37 PM #3

Confirmed. After nine years with the 4790K, I upgraded to a 7800X3D since 4C/8T consistently limited performance in most titles requiring over 99% CPU usage. While some games only reached 60% GPU utilization (1080Ti), most exceeded the four-core threshold needed for optimal gaming.

W
WorldOfBruiser
Junior Member
2
04-05-2016, 04:59 PM
#4
I understand I might face some delays, but I’m choosing to speed things up so I can definitely see improvement.
W
WorldOfBruiser
04-05-2016, 04:59 PM #4

I understand I might face some delays, but I’m choosing to speed things up so I can definitely see improvement.

L
linkdan8
Junior Member
9
04-11-2016, 01:07 AM
#5
For platforms other than Haswell, the motherboard power supply plays a minor role thanks to its integrated voltage regulator. I’d aim for a 4GHz and 1.2V core voltage. Gradually raise the frequency in 100MHz increments, then when instability appears boost the voltage by 0.01V at each step until stability returns or overheating starts. Once stable, increase the frequency again.
L
linkdan8
04-11-2016, 01:07 AM #5

For platforms other than Haswell, the motherboard power supply plays a minor role thanks to its integrated voltage regulator. I’d aim for a 4GHz and 1.2V core voltage. Gradually raise the frequency in 100MHz increments, then when instability appears boost the voltage by 0.01V at each step until stability returns or overheating starts. Once stable, increase the frequency again.

R
RamboPvPz
Member
50
04-17-2016, 02:49 AM
#6
When people struggle with reading, I’ll provide a response too. I’ve been running 4.8 at 1.28 for years. I even managed 4.9 during some sessions. I didn’t realize the value in pushing it to its limits, but it did help despite the hardware constraints and games I tried. My 4th generation didn’t handle overclocking well, yet it performed better than the 4770k I had before. If you plan to upgrade, replacing the old unit would be the best choice.
R
RamboPvPz
04-17-2016, 02:49 AM #6

When people struggle with reading, I’ll provide a response too. I’ve been running 4.8 at 1.28 for years. I even managed 4.9 during some sessions. I didn’t realize the value in pushing it to its limits, but it did help despite the hardware constraints and games I tried. My 4th generation didn’t handle overclocking well, yet it performed better than the 4770k I had before. If you plan to upgrade, replacing the old unit would be the best choice.

H
hanniie_
Junior Member
36
04-17-2016, 10:20 AM
#7
For stress testing the clock, consider using specialized software designed for timing analysis. Regarding cache speed, raising it can improve performance but depends on your system's needs—leave it at stock if you're unsure.
H
hanniie_
04-17-2016, 10:20 AM #7

For stress testing the clock, consider using specialized software designed for timing analysis. Regarding cache speed, raising it can improve performance but depends on your system's needs—leave it at stock if you're unsure.

M
moggy117
Junior Member
19
04-17-2016, 04:57 PM
#8
If it can boost performance and remain steady, you can't guarantee its value without checking with tools like Cinebench. I rely on Prime95 and real-life scenarios for testing. It works for rendering or gaming tasks.
M
moggy117
04-17-2016, 04:57 PM #8

If it can boost performance and remain steady, you can't guarantee its value without checking with tools like Cinebench. I rely on Prime95 and real-life scenarios for testing. It works for rendering or gaming tasks.

P
PACMAC22
Member
132
04-17-2016, 08:36 PM
#9
I built it at 4.9ghz using a 1.34v ring, paired with a 280aio
P
PACMAC22
04-17-2016, 08:36 PM #9

I built it at 4.9ghz using a 1.34v ring, paired with a 280aio