F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Pentium G3258 Overlocking Help

Pentium G3258 Overlocking Help

Pentium G3258 Overlocking Help

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
G
Gladiador70
Senior Member
698
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM
#1
Hello, I recently assembled my PC and everything is functioning perfectly. I’m using a Pentium G3258 because I thought overclocking could be an interesting challenge. My G3258 runs at 4.2GHz (with a +1GHz overclock setting) and operates at 1.3V. This performance is significantly lower than the 4.5GHz overclock at 1.25V found in other systems. It’s quite disappointing, as I’m struggling to even reach 4.4GHz at 1.37 volts. I was about to give up and consider replacing it with a new unit, but then I discovered this article: The author shared similar issues and eventually found a solution involving ring voltage. I’m still confused about concepts like ring voltage and uncore voltage; I can’t locate any relevant information in my BIOS settings. It’s just a lot of confusing technical terms. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! (Btw I’m using an ASUS rog z87 impact motherboard with the latest BIOS update. Temperatures are fine, and I have a solid AIO water cooling loop.) Thanks again!
G
Gladiador70
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM #1

Hello, I recently assembled my PC and everything is functioning perfectly. I’m using a Pentium G3258 because I thought overclocking could be an interesting challenge. My G3258 runs at 4.2GHz (with a +1GHz overclock setting) and operates at 1.3V. This performance is significantly lower than the 4.5GHz overclock at 1.25V found in other systems. It’s quite disappointing, as I’m struggling to even reach 4.4GHz at 1.37 volts. I was about to give up and consider replacing it with a new unit, but then I discovered this article: The author shared similar issues and eventually found a solution involving ring voltage. I’m still confused about concepts like ring voltage and uncore voltage; I can’t locate any relevant information in my BIOS settings. It’s just a lot of confusing technical terms. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! (Btw I’m using an ASUS rog z87 impact motherboard with the latest BIOS update. Temperatures are fine, and I have a solid AIO water cooling loop.) Thanks again!

I
impiiii
Member
135
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM
#2
We can therefore determine that 4.2GHz represents the maximum speed of your CPU. The difference between 4.2GHz and 4.5GHz in games won't be significant, and you still have the option to purchase a used i5 or i7 processor in the near future (this was my intention all along). If the performance gap between Haswell and Zen isn't substantial, you could aim for a boost to 1.35v, though an AIO might be necessary depending on your country's heat conditions.
I
impiiii
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM #2

We can therefore determine that 4.2GHz represents the maximum speed of your CPU. The difference between 4.2GHz and 4.5GHz in games won't be significant, and you still have the option to purchase a used i5 or i7 processor in the near future (this was my intention all along). If the performance gap between Haswell and Zen isn't substantial, you could aim for a boost to 1.35v, though an AIO might be necessary depending on your country's heat conditions.

S
supersanti
Member
63
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM
#3
Hey, why waste time with a great motherboard when you can upgrade the CPU later, lol?
S
supersanti
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM #3

Hey, why waste time with a great motherboard when you can upgrade the CPU later, lol?

T
TNTGamer360
Junior Member
6
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM
#4
The text discusses the idea of upgrading later and questions about CPU cache frequency settings. It also mentions concerns about auto settings affecting optimization.
T
TNTGamer360
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM #4

The text discusses the idea of upgrading later and questions about CPU cache frequency settings. It also mentions concerns about auto settings affecting optimization.

S
Strafeliner
Member
165
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM
#5
It depends on the results of your initial setup. Here’s what I did with my 4.3GHz mild overclock:
-I adjusted the memory voltage by 0.005v to ensure stability
-I increased the CPU ring ratio (CPU Cache Frequency) to 4000 MHz @ 1.2v, but it didn’t work, so I reduced it to 3000 MHz. It’s working well—experiment with what suits your CPU
Also:
-Try pushing your CPU to 4 GHz at 1.1v, keeping all other settings in auto mode and running a stress test for 10–30 minutes to confirm stability.
EDIT: The goal is to align the CPU core clock with the core ring/cache ratio as closely as possible without overvolting the core ring/cache (the "Uncore"). Very few people, including myself, get a chip that stabilizes when you lower the Uncore ratio.
S
Strafeliner
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM #5

It depends on the results of your initial setup. Here’s what I did with my 4.3GHz mild overclock:
-I adjusted the memory voltage by 0.005v to ensure stability
-I increased the CPU ring ratio (CPU Cache Frequency) to 4000 MHz @ 1.2v, but it didn’t work, so I reduced it to 3000 MHz. It’s working well—experiment with what suits your CPU
Also:
-Try pushing your CPU to 4 GHz at 1.1v, keeping all other settings in auto mode and running a stress test for 10–30 minutes to confirm stability.
EDIT: The goal is to align the CPU core clock with the core ring/cache ratio as closely as possible without overvolting the core ring/cache (the "Uncore"). Very few people, including myself, get a chip that stabilizes when you lower the Uncore ratio.

K
KayaChan_
Member
206
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM
#6
Depends on the luck of the draw. Here’s how I approached my 4.3GHz mild overclock:
-I increased the memory voltage by 0.005v to ensure stability
-I adjusted the CPU ring ratio (CPU Cache Frequency) to 4000 MHz @ 1.2v, but it didn’t work, so I lowered it to 3000 MHz. It’s working well. Check what works best for your CPU
Also:
-Try pushing your CPU to 4 GHz at 1.1v with all settings in auto mode and run a stress test for 10-30 minutes to confirm it can handle further overclocking
EDIT: The goal is to keep the CPU core clock and ring/cache ratio as close to 1:1 as possible without overvolting the core/cache (the "Uncore"). Very few people, including myself, get a chip that stabilizes when you reduce the Uncore ratio.
Hi, thanks for the advice. I’m unsure what to do next. I tried adjusting the ring ratio to 4000MHz and multiplayer at 43x with 1.2v, but it didn’t work. I hadn’t lowered the MHz yet. Was the focus on changing ring volts or Cache Volts? I left them on Auto. I also attempted your second idea: running at 4GHz @ 1.1 with auto settings. It didn’t boot at 1.1 or 1.2. It’s currently at 1.25V and 4GHz, with a successful prime95 stress test (no errors). What should I do next and what does this imply for my CPU overclocking potential?
K
KayaChan_
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM #6

Depends on the luck of the draw. Here’s how I approached my 4.3GHz mild overclock:
-I increased the memory voltage by 0.005v to ensure stability
-I adjusted the CPU ring ratio (CPU Cache Frequency) to 4000 MHz @ 1.2v, but it didn’t work, so I lowered it to 3000 MHz. It’s working well. Check what works best for your CPU
Also:
-Try pushing your CPU to 4 GHz at 1.1v with all settings in auto mode and run a stress test for 10-30 minutes to confirm it can handle further overclocking
EDIT: The goal is to keep the CPU core clock and ring/cache ratio as close to 1:1 as possible without overvolting the core/cache (the "Uncore"). Very few people, including myself, get a chip that stabilizes when you reduce the Uncore ratio.
Hi, thanks for the advice. I’m unsure what to do next. I tried adjusting the ring ratio to 4000MHz and multiplayer at 43x with 1.2v, but it didn’t work. I hadn’t lowered the MHz yet. Was the focus on changing ring volts or Cache Volts? I left them on Auto. I also attempted your second idea: running at 4GHz @ 1.1 with auto settings. It didn’t boot at 1.1 or 1.2. It’s currently at 1.25V and 4GHz, with a successful prime95 stress test (no errors). What should I do next and what does this imply for my CPU overclocking potential?

I
iPhan
Member
183
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM
#7
Depends on the luck of the draw. Here’s what I did with my 4.3GHz mild overclock:
-I increased the memory voltage by 0.005v to ensure stability wouldn't be negatively impacted
-I adjusted the CPU ring ratio (CPU Cache Frequency) to 4000 MHz @ 1.2v, but it didn’t work, so I lowered it to 3000 MHz. It’s working well. See what suits your CPU best
Also:
-Try pushing your CPU to 4 GHz at 1.1v with all settings in auto mode and run a stress test for 10-30 minutes to confirm it can handle further overclocking
EDIT: The goal is to align the CPU core clock and the CPU Ring/Cache as closely as possible to a 1:1 ratio without exceeding the limits of the CPU Ring/Cache (the "Uncore"). Very few people, including myself, get a chip that stabilizes when you reduce the Uncore ratio.
Hi, thanks for the advice. I’m unsure what to do next. I attempted the first suggestion—adjusting the ring ratio to 4000MHz with multiplayer at 1.2v—but it didn’t work. I hadn’t tried lowering the MHz yet. Was the focus on adjusting ring volts or Cache Volts? Since I left them on Auto, I wasn’t sure.
I also tried your second idea: running it at 4GHz with 1.1v and all other settings in auto. It didn’t boot at 1.1 or 1.2. Currently it’s stable at 1.25V with 4GHz, and the Prime95 stress test completed without errors. What should I do next, and what does this imply for my CPU’s overclocking potential?
It seems like a weak chip for overclocking. Consider lowering the ring ratio to 3000 MHz with the ring voltage set to auto/default and observe the effects on voltage and stability overall.
I
iPhan
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM #7

Depends on the luck of the draw. Here’s what I did with my 4.3GHz mild overclock:
-I increased the memory voltage by 0.005v to ensure stability wouldn't be negatively impacted
-I adjusted the CPU ring ratio (CPU Cache Frequency) to 4000 MHz @ 1.2v, but it didn’t work, so I lowered it to 3000 MHz. It’s working well. See what suits your CPU best
Also:
-Try pushing your CPU to 4 GHz at 1.1v with all settings in auto mode and run a stress test for 10-30 minutes to confirm it can handle further overclocking
EDIT: The goal is to align the CPU core clock and the CPU Ring/Cache as closely as possible to a 1:1 ratio without exceeding the limits of the CPU Ring/Cache (the "Uncore"). Very few people, including myself, get a chip that stabilizes when you reduce the Uncore ratio.
Hi, thanks for the advice. I’m unsure what to do next. I attempted the first suggestion—adjusting the ring ratio to 4000MHz with multiplayer at 1.2v—but it didn’t work. I hadn’t tried lowering the MHz yet. Was the focus on adjusting ring volts or Cache Volts? Since I left them on Auto, I wasn’t sure.
I also tried your second idea: running it at 4GHz with 1.1v and all other settings in auto. It didn’t boot at 1.1 or 1.2. Currently it’s stable at 1.25V with 4GHz, and the Prime95 stress test completed without errors. What should I do next, and what does this imply for my CPU’s overclocking potential?
It seems like a weak chip for overclocking. Consider lowering the ring ratio to 3000 MHz with the ring voltage set to auto/default and observe the effects on voltage and stability overall.

C
Creeperman3
Senior Member
454
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM
#8
AJ Kenway:
Depends on the luck you had with the initial settings. Here’s what I did with my 4.3GHz mild overclock:
-I increased the memory voltage by 0.005v to ensure stability wouldn't be negatively impacted
-I adjusted the CPU ring ratio (CPU Cache Frequency) to 4000 MHz @ 1.2v, but it didn’t work, so I lowered it back to 3000 MHz. It’s working well—experiment with what suits your CPU best
Also:
-Try pushing your CPU to 4 GHz at 1.1v, keeping all other settings in auto mode and running a stress test for 10-30 minutes to confirm the CPU can handle further overclocking
EDIT: The goal is to align the CPU core clock with the CPU Ring/Cache as closely as possible without exceeding safe limits on the Ring/Cache (often called "Uncore"). Very few people, including myself, get a chip that stabilizes when you reduce the Uncore ratio.
Hi, thanks for the advice. I’m uncertain about next steps—I attempted adjusting the ring ratio to 4000MHz and multiplayer at 1.2v on 43x, but it failed. I hadn’t tried lowering the MHz yet. Was the focus on ring volts or Cache Volts? Since I left them auto, I wasn’t sure.
I also tried your second idea: running at 4GHz with 1.1v and all other settings in auto. It didn’t boot at either speed. Currently it’s stable at 1.25V 4GHz, and the Prime95 stress test completed without errors. What should I do and what does this imply for my CPU’s overclocking potential?
It seems like a weak chip. Consider lowering the ring ratio to 3000 MHz with auto/default ring voltage and observe the impact on voltage and stability overall.
4.3GHz isn’t viable at 1.25V, regardless of ring ratio. Even at 1000MHz, it boots. Probably just a poor build. Try reducing the ring ratio to 3000 MHz and see how that affects performance.
C
Creeperman3
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM #8

AJ Kenway:
Depends on the luck you had with the initial settings. Here’s what I did with my 4.3GHz mild overclock:
-I increased the memory voltage by 0.005v to ensure stability wouldn't be negatively impacted
-I adjusted the CPU ring ratio (CPU Cache Frequency) to 4000 MHz @ 1.2v, but it didn’t work, so I lowered it back to 3000 MHz. It’s working well—experiment with what suits your CPU best
Also:
-Try pushing your CPU to 4 GHz at 1.1v, keeping all other settings in auto mode and running a stress test for 10-30 minutes to confirm the CPU can handle further overclocking
EDIT: The goal is to align the CPU core clock with the CPU Ring/Cache as closely as possible without exceeding safe limits on the Ring/Cache (often called "Uncore"). Very few people, including myself, get a chip that stabilizes when you reduce the Uncore ratio.
Hi, thanks for the advice. I’m uncertain about next steps—I attempted adjusting the ring ratio to 4000MHz and multiplayer at 1.2v on 43x, but it failed. I hadn’t tried lowering the MHz yet. Was the focus on ring volts or Cache Volts? Since I left them auto, I wasn’t sure.
I also tried your second idea: running at 4GHz with 1.1v and all other settings in auto. It didn’t boot at either speed. Currently it’s stable at 1.25V 4GHz, and the Prime95 stress test completed without errors. What should I do and what does this imply for my CPU’s overclocking potential?
It seems like a weak chip. Consider lowering the ring ratio to 3000 MHz with auto/default ring voltage and observe the impact on voltage and stability overall.
4.3GHz isn’t viable at 1.25V, regardless of ring ratio. Even at 1000MHz, it boots. Probably just a poor build. Try reducing the ring ratio to 3000 MHz and see how that affects performance.

M
MLGLegend
Junior Member
2
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM
#9
AJ Kenway:
Depends on the luck you had with the initial settings. Here’s what I did with my 4.3GHz mild overclock:
-I increased the memory voltage by 0.005v to ensure stability wouldn't be negatively impacted
-I adjusted the CPU ring ratio (CPU Cache Frequency on ASUS boards, likely) to 4000 MHz @ 1.2v, but it didn’t work, so I lowered it back to 3000 MHz. It’s working nicely. See what suits your CPU best
Also:
-Try pushing your CPU to 4 GHz at 1.1v with all other settings in auto mode and run a stress test for 10-30 minutes to confirm the CPU can handle further overclocking
EDIT: The goal is to align your CPU core clock and ring/cache ratio as closely as possible without exceeding safe limits for the core voltage. Very few people (including me) get a chip that stabilizes when you reduce the core voltage ratio.
Hi, thanks for the advice. I’m uncertain about next steps. I attempted the first suggestion—adjusting the ring ratio to 4000MHz with multiplayer at 1.2v—but it failed. I hadn’t tried lowering the MHz yet. Was the focus on ring volts or cache volts? Since I left them auto, I wasn’t sure.
I also tried your second idea: running at 4GHz with 1.1v and all other settings auto. It didn’t boot at either speed. Currently it’s stable at 1.25V 4GHz, and I completed a prime95 stress test without errors. What should I do next, and what does this imply for my CPU’s overclocking potential?
It seems like a weak chip. Consider lowering the ring ratio to 3000 MHz with auto/default ring voltage and observe the impact on voltage and stability.
4.3GHz isn’t viable at 1.25V regardless of ring ratio. Even at 1000MHz, it boots. Probably not worth it.
M
MLGLegend
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM #9

AJ Kenway:
Depends on the luck you had with the initial settings. Here’s what I did with my 4.3GHz mild overclock:
-I increased the memory voltage by 0.005v to ensure stability wouldn't be negatively impacted
-I adjusted the CPU ring ratio (CPU Cache Frequency on ASUS boards, likely) to 4000 MHz @ 1.2v, but it didn’t work, so I lowered it back to 3000 MHz. It’s working nicely. See what suits your CPU best
Also:
-Try pushing your CPU to 4 GHz at 1.1v with all other settings in auto mode and run a stress test for 10-30 minutes to confirm the CPU can handle further overclocking
EDIT: The goal is to align your CPU core clock and ring/cache ratio as closely as possible without exceeding safe limits for the core voltage. Very few people (including me) get a chip that stabilizes when you reduce the core voltage ratio.
Hi, thanks for the advice. I’m uncertain about next steps. I attempted the first suggestion—adjusting the ring ratio to 4000MHz with multiplayer at 1.2v—but it failed. I hadn’t tried lowering the MHz yet. Was the focus on ring volts or cache volts? Since I left them auto, I wasn’t sure.
I also tried your second idea: running at 4GHz with 1.1v and all other settings auto. It didn’t boot at either speed. Currently it’s stable at 1.25V 4GHz, and I completed a prime95 stress test without errors. What should I do next, and what does this imply for my CPU’s overclocking potential?
It seems like a weak chip. Consider lowering the ring ratio to 3000 MHz with auto/default ring voltage and observe the impact on voltage and stability.
4.3GHz isn’t viable at 1.25V regardless of ring ratio. Even at 1000MHz, it boots. Probably not worth it.

D
Dacaspex
Member
156
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM
#10
AJ Kenway:
Depends on the luck you had during the "draw". Here’s what I did with my 4.3GHz mild overclock:
-I increased the memory voltage by 0.005v to ensure stability wouldn’t be negatively impacted
-I adjusted the CPU ring ratio (CPU Cache Frequency on ASUS boards, I think) to 4000 MHz @ 1.2v, but that didn’t succeed, so I lowered it back to 3000 MHz. It works fine. See what suits your CPU best
Also:
-Try pushing your CPU to 4 GHz at 1.1v with all other settings in auto mode and run a stress test for 10-30 minutes to confirm the CPU can handle further overclocking
EDIT: The goal is to align your CPU core clock and ring/cache as closely as possible to a 1:1 ratio without excessively overvolting the core/cache (the "Uncore"). Very few people, including me, get a chip that stabilizes when you reduce the Uncore ratio.
Hi, thanks for the advice. I’m unsure what to do next. I attempted the first suggestion—adjusting the ring ratio to 4000MHz with multiplayer at 1.2v on 43x—but it failed. I hadn’t tried lowering the MHz yet. Was the focus on ring volts or Cache Volts? Since I left them auto, I’m not sure.
I also tried your second idea: running at 4GHz @ 1.1 with all settings in auto. It didn’t boot at either speed. Currently it’s at 1.25V and 4GHz, and I completed a Prime95 stress test without errors. What should I do next, and what does this imply for my CPU’s overclocking potential?
It seems like a weak chip. Consider lowering the ring ratio to 3000 MHz with ring voltage set to auto/default and observe the impact on voltage and stability.
4.3GHz won’t work at 1.25V regardless of ring ratio. Even at 1000MHz, it boots. I think it’s not a reliable option.
Consider trying 4.3GHz @ 1.3v
Thanks for the guidance, but with these settings it might not even boot.
D
Dacaspex
02-17-2024, 07:19 PM #10

AJ Kenway:
Depends on the luck you had during the "draw". Here’s what I did with my 4.3GHz mild overclock:
-I increased the memory voltage by 0.005v to ensure stability wouldn’t be negatively impacted
-I adjusted the CPU ring ratio (CPU Cache Frequency on ASUS boards, I think) to 4000 MHz @ 1.2v, but that didn’t succeed, so I lowered it back to 3000 MHz. It works fine. See what suits your CPU best
Also:
-Try pushing your CPU to 4 GHz at 1.1v with all other settings in auto mode and run a stress test for 10-30 minutes to confirm the CPU can handle further overclocking
EDIT: The goal is to align your CPU core clock and ring/cache as closely as possible to a 1:1 ratio without excessively overvolting the core/cache (the "Uncore"). Very few people, including me, get a chip that stabilizes when you reduce the Uncore ratio.
Hi, thanks for the advice. I’m unsure what to do next. I attempted the first suggestion—adjusting the ring ratio to 4000MHz with multiplayer at 1.2v on 43x—but it failed. I hadn’t tried lowering the MHz yet. Was the focus on ring volts or Cache Volts? Since I left them auto, I’m not sure.
I also tried your second idea: running at 4GHz @ 1.1 with all settings in auto. It didn’t boot at either speed. Currently it’s at 1.25V and 4GHz, and I completed a Prime95 stress test without errors. What should I do next, and what does this imply for my CPU’s overclocking potential?
It seems like a weak chip. Consider lowering the ring ratio to 3000 MHz with ring voltage set to auto/default and observe the impact on voltage and stability.
4.3GHz won’t work at 1.25V regardless of ring ratio. Even at 1000MHz, it boots. I think it’s not a reliable option.
Consider trying 4.3GHz @ 1.3v
Thanks for the guidance, but with these settings it might not even boot.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next