F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming PC Specifications Guide

PC Specifications Guide

PC Specifications Guide

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
D
dmille123
Junior Member
47
05-02-2016, 01:33 AM
#11
I believe Ubisoft should withdraw from the PC market rather than keep criticizing us. It's clear they no longer prioritize our needs. It's unreasonable to assume the lowest specs needed for smooth gameplay are the same as those required for high frame rates in titles like BF4, which can run at 70fps. I don't see a significant improvement in graphics performance. Checking Steam's annual specifications suggests many systems have GPUs comparable to or better than a GTX680. Essentially, a mid to upper-tier card (like the 770) would be sufficient...
D
dmille123
05-02-2016, 01:33 AM #11

I believe Ubisoft should withdraw from the PC market rather than keep criticizing us. It's clear they no longer prioritize our needs. It's unreasonable to assume the lowest specs needed for smooth gameplay are the same as those required for high frame rates in titles like BF4, which can run at 70fps. I don't see a significant improvement in graphics performance. Checking Steam's annual specifications suggests many systems have GPUs comparable to or better than a GTX680. Essentially, a mid to upper-tier card (like the 770) would be sufficient...

L
levoyageur92
Posting Freak
807
05-04-2016, 06:34 AM
#12
Take a look at a game such as Shadow of Mordor. It appears stunning and performs well across many systems. There’s nothing to hide from Ubisoft for achieving this level of quality.
L
levoyageur92
05-04-2016, 06:34 AM #12

Take a look at a game such as Shadow of Mordor. It appears stunning and performs well across many systems. There’s nothing to hide from Ubisoft for achieving this level of quality.

H
Hydrust
Member
210
05-04-2016, 06:43 AM
#13
Ubisoft has made a poor decision by capping the frame rate and resolution. They claim not much effort was put into optimizing the game for PCs. We urge everyone to ask them to reconsider: https://www.change.org/p/ubisoft-stop-li...ook-better
H
Hydrust
05-04-2016, 06:43 AM #13

Ubisoft has made a poor decision by capping the frame rate and resolution. They claim not much effort was put into optimizing the game for PCs. We urge everyone to ask them to reconsider: https://www.change.org/p/ubisoft-stop-li...ook-better

H
Henry2999
Junior Member
10
05-04-2016, 11:52 AM
#14
H
Henry2999
05-04-2016, 11:52 AM #14

N
Nightwolf_C
Member
107
05-06-2016, 03:44 AM
#15
They might have to recruit a team capable of transferring the game onto PC properly, since things are becoming increasingly absurd. By this stage, they’re essentially doomed to fail.
N
Nightwolf_C
05-06-2016, 03:44 AM #15

They might have to recruit a team capable of transferring the game onto PC properly, since things are becoming increasingly absurd. By this stage, they’re essentially doomed to fail.

J
jonatan1234
Member
215
05-08-2016, 02:22 PM
#16
Usbisoft... do they understand the CPU?
J
jonatan1234
05-08-2016, 02:22 PM #16

Usbisoft... do they understand the CPU?

F
Flare_Chick
Member
182
05-09-2016, 09:12 AM
#17
If the game featured graphics similar to Crysis 2 and Witcher 2, I wouldn’t mind the high demands, but watching those gameplay clips doesn’t make up for it.
F
Flare_Chick
05-09-2016, 09:12 AM #17

If the game featured graphics similar to Crysis 2 and Witcher 2, I wouldn’t mind the high demands, but watching those gameplay clips doesn’t make up for it.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2