F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Overclocking temps 8600k

Overclocking temps 8600k

Overclocking temps 8600k

C
CooKonut
Member
196
11-07-2017, 07:05 PM
#1
Hey everyone,
I recently got an 8600k OC'd to 4.6 across all cores. During casual gaming like R6S, I see around 66°C, and cinebench shows similar results.
If I push it to 4.9 on all cores, the temperature climbs into the high 70s.
I'm just starting out with overclocking and wondering if those temperatures are within safe limits.
My cooler is a Deepcool Captain 240.
C
CooKonut
11-07-2017, 07:05 PM #1

Hey everyone,
I recently got an 8600k OC'd to 4.6 across all cores. During casual gaming like R6S, I see around 66°C, and cinebench shows similar results.
If I push it to 4.9 on all cores, the temperature climbs into the high 70s.
I'm just starting out with overclocking and wondering if those temperatures are within safe limits.
My cooler is a Deepcool Captain 240.

A
Arkin2000
Member
66
11-08-2017, 12:36 PM
#2
Your temperatures are ideal for 4.6ghz or 4.9ghz. For reference, when I was at 4.6ghz I discovered I could maintain stability by simply raising the multiplier to 46. The performance was smooth with a low vcore of 1.218v. Of course, that wasn't my main aim, just a note.
A
Arkin2000
11-08-2017, 12:36 PM #2

Your temperatures are ideal for 4.6ghz or 4.9ghz. For reference, when I was at 4.6ghz I discovered I could maintain stability by simply raising the multiplier to 46. The performance was smooth with a low vcore of 1.218v. Of course, that wasn't my main aim, just a note.

I
iiTurtle_
Member
61
11-08-2017, 01:28 PM
#3
I’d say a high 70s in the 4.9 range is quite good. It’s warm but acceptable. Did you try lowering the voltage manually?
I
iiTurtle_
11-08-2017, 01:28 PM #3

I’d say a high 70s in the 4.9 range is quite good. It’s warm but acceptable. Did you try lowering the voltage manually?

E
emmylee33
Senior Member
710
11-08-2017, 09:25 PM
#4
Those temperatures are quite nice, particularly since they match what you'd expect during stress tests. Normal usage or gaming typically requires less heat.
E
emmylee33
11-08-2017, 09:25 PM #4

Those temperatures are quite nice, particularly since they match what you'd expect during stress tests. Normal usage or gaming typically requires less heat.

M
marijn1505
Junior Member
47
11-09-2017, 04:50 AM
#5
J_E_D_70 would say a high 70s around 4.9 is quite good. It's warm but acceptable. I experimented by manually adjusting the voltage, and achieved a stable OC at 5ghz without exceeding 72°, which is very satisfying.
M
marijn1505
11-09-2017, 04:50 AM #5

J_E_D_70 would say a high 70s around 4.9 is quite good. It's warm but acceptable. I experimented by manually adjusting the voltage, and achieved a stable OC at 5ghz without exceeding 72°, which is very satisfying.

D
DeathBeastDB
Senior Member
337
11-09-2017, 06:05 AM
#6
Nice!
D
DeathBeastDB
11-09-2017, 06:05 AM #6

Nice!

F
Fynero
Member
195
11-09-2017, 12:39 PM
#7
Nice! Very! If you wished to conduct further testing, Prime95 V26.6 Small FFTs would be a suitable choice. http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=15504
F
Fynero
11-09-2017, 12:39 PM #7

Nice! Very! If you wished to conduct further testing, Prime95 V26.6 Small FFTs would be a suitable choice. http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=15504

R
Razok
Junior Member
20
11-09-2017, 06:49 PM
#8
Your temperatures are ideal for 4.6ghz or 4.9ghz.
Additionally, when I was at 4.6ghz, I discovered that increasing the multiplier to 46 allowed me to maintain stable performance by simply lowering the vcore to a comfortable 1.218v.
R
Razok
11-09-2017, 06:49 PM #8

Your temperatures are ideal for 4.6ghz or 4.9ghz.
Additionally, when I was at 4.6ghz, I discovered that increasing the multiplier to 46 allowed me to maintain stable performance by simply lowering the vcore to a comfortable 1.218v.