F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Overclocking Ryzen 3000 is pointless and speed is merely a figure

Overclocking Ryzen 3000 is pointless and speed is merely a figure

Overclocking Ryzen 3000 is pointless and speed is merely a figure

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
W
walee123
Senior Member
737
02-02-2020, 09:53 AM
#11
My 3000 and 5000 series are already near the maximum headroom, so manually adjusting the CPU clock isn't really necessary. The CPUs I managed to secure recently were the Ryzen 1600AFs.
W
walee123
02-02-2020, 09:53 AM #11

My 3000 and 5000 series are already near the maximum headroom, so manually adjusting the CPU clock isn't really necessary. The CPUs I managed to secure recently were the Ryzen 1600AFs.

H
HolgerHolm95
Junior Member
21
02-02-2020, 11:59 AM
#12
I believe they rely on the upgraded Zen+ dies from the 2600 series to achieve the performance gains you see, along with the boost from the original Zen architecture.
Most users seem taken in by what came before. I recall upgrading my FX6300 from its standard clock speeds of 3500-3600 to over 4500, which provided a significant performance increase. Back then, a case that supported a liquid cooler and a motherboard capable of handling the CPU would have been suitable for speeds around 5GHz. That was a different time; now we have 7nm technology with much higher IPC.
H
HolgerHolm95
02-02-2020, 11:59 AM #12

I believe they rely on the upgraded Zen+ dies from the 2600 series to achieve the performance gains you see, along with the boost from the original Zen architecture.
Most users seem taken in by what came before. I recall upgrading my FX6300 from its standard clock speeds of 3500-3600 to over 4500, which provided a significant performance increase. Back then, a case that supported a liquid cooler and a motherboard capable of handling the CPU would have been suitable for speeds around 5GHz. That was a different time; now we have 7nm technology with much higher IPC.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2