F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Overclocking my System

Overclocking my System

Overclocking my System

L
Lior1001
Member
143
07-09-2017, 09:58 AM
#1
You can try increasing the clock speed of your AMD fx-6350 by 100MHz, but make sure you have a compatible motherboard and cooler.
L
Lior1001
07-09-2017, 09:58 AM #1

You can try increasing the clock speed of your AMD fx-6350 by 100MHz, but make sure you have a compatible motherboard and cooler.

J
jpt01
Junior Member
46
07-10-2017, 12:24 PM
#2
Probably but consider the advantages and disadvantages of this approach.
Pro – Achieving the 4.0GHz benchmark.
Con – Potential heating issues and possible CPU damage with a 2.5% power rise.
For example, if a task usually takes 60 seconds at 3.9GHz, it would finish in 58.5 seconds. Would you really want to save just 1.5 seconds? If yes, proceed; otherwise, it might not be worth the trouble for such a minor improvement.
J
jpt01
07-10-2017, 12:24 PM #2

Probably but consider the advantages and disadvantages of this approach.
Pro – Achieving the 4.0GHz benchmark.
Con – Potential heating issues and possible CPU damage with a 2.5% power rise.
For example, if a task usually takes 60 seconds at 3.9GHz, it would finish in 58.5 seconds. Would you really want to save just 1.5 seconds? If yes, proceed; otherwise, it might not be worth the trouble for such a minor improvement.

H
horse2828
Junior Member
12
07-10-2017, 05:40 PM
#3
Probably but consider the advantages and disadvantages of this approach.
Pro – Achieving the 4.0GHz benchmark.
Con – Potential heating issues and possible CPU damage with a 2.5% power rise.
For example, if a task usually takes 60 seconds at 3.9GHz, it would finish in 58.5 seconds. Would you really want to save just 1.5 seconds? If yes, go for it. Otherwise, it might not be worth the trouble for such a minor improvement.
H
horse2828
07-10-2017, 05:40 PM #3

Probably but consider the advantages and disadvantages of this approach.
Pro – Achieving the 4.0GHz benchmark.
Con – Potential heating issues and possible CPU damage with a 2.5% power rise.
For example, if a task usually takes 60 seconds at 3.9GHz, it would finish in 58.5 seconds. Would you really want to save just 1.5 seconds? If yes, go for it. Otherwise, it might not be worth the trouble for such a minor improvement.

N
NooLele
Posting Freak
847
07-12-2017, 01:55 PM
#4
Thanks for the guidance. I believe I won't need to do anything.
N
NooLele
07-12-2017, 01:55 PM #4

Thanks for the guidance. I believe I won't need to do anything.

D
Dacaspex
Member
156
07-12-2017, 06:50 PM
#5
For a real and significant boost, invest in a good heatsink or cooler. This should allow your CPU to reach around 4.5Ghz, possibly even higher. However, this comes with increased power consumption and heat generation. Stability testing becomes essential. If you prefer not to overclock, an FX-8350 or FX-8370 would suffice, but they won’t match the performance of a modern Intel i5 setup.
D
Dacaspex
07-12-2017, 06:50 PM #5

For a real and significant boost, invest in a good heatsink or cooler. This should allow your CPU to reach around 4.5Ghz, possibly even higher. However, this comes with increased power consumption and heat generation. Stability testing becomes essential. If you prefer not to overclock, an FX-8350 or FX-8370 would suffice, but they won’t match the performance of a modern Intel i5 setup.