F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Overclocking (Auto Turbo Boost) on my i7 3770K – Conversation about Turbo Boost

Overclocking (Auto Turbo Boost) on my i7 3770K – Conversation about Turbo Boost

Overclocking (Auto Turbo Boost) on my i7 3770K – Conversation about Turbo Boost

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
K
153
10-21-2016, 11:17 AM
#1
Hello, I've been experimenting with Intel's turbo boost technology in BIOS for some time now. At first, I noticed a performance boost up to 3.9 GHz as advertised during purchase. When I switched it to manual mode, the system automatically adjusted the multiplier to x41, allowing my CPU to exceed 4.2GHz with the 103 MHz bus speed. After learning this, I decided to keep my Intel stock cooler away from dust and conducted further research before finally purchasing the Hyper-212 Evo. This setup has provided me with an extremely stable CPU speed, which I've maintained for at least one and a half years without overheating issues.

I'm curious if others have tried overclocking with Intel's turbo boost or prefer to do it manually.
"Intel® Turbo Boost Technology can automatically increase the processor core speed beyond the listed frequency when operating within power, temperature, and current limits defined by the thermal design power (TDP). It enhances performance for both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications."

From the frequently asked questions on Intel's website:
Can I set a specific maximum frequency for Intel® Turbo Boost Technology?
No. The maximum processor frequency is automatically determined based on operational conditions.
K
katnissgirl115
10-21-2016, 11:17 AM #1

Hello, I've been experimenting with Intel's turbo boost technology in BIOS for some time now. At first, I noticed a performance boost up to 3.9 GHz as advertised during purchase. When I switched it to manual mode, the system automatically adjusted the multiplier to x41, allowing my CPU to exceed 4.2GHz with the 103 MHz bus speed. After learning this, I decided to keep my Intel stock cooler away from dust and conducted further research before finally purchasing the Hyper-212 Evo. This setup has provided me with an extremely stable CPU speed, which I've maintained for at least one and a half years without overheating issues.

I'm curious if others have tried overclocking with Intel's turbo boost or prefer to do it manually.
"Intel® Turbo Boost Technology can automatically increase the processor core speed beyond the listed frequency when operating within power, temperature, and current limits defined by the thermal design power (TDP). It enhances performance for both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications."

From the frequently asked questions on Intel's website:
Can I set a specific maximum frequency for Intel® Turbo Boost Technology?
No. The maximum processor frequency is automatically determined based on operational conditions.

V
VenturaBr
Junior Member
6
10-22-2016, 06:15 AM
#2
Above the stock level, overclocking is still considered overclocking. Although turbo speeds can be adjusted, they no longer meet Intel's definition of "turbo." The distinction between turbo multi and normal ocing is mainly in how each core is utilized. However, increasing the speed too much can cause instability. You can often go higher even on the stock voltage setting. If you leave the voltage auto, it applies more power than necessary. For better performance at the same temperature and power consumption, manually adjusting it might be more effective.
V
VenturaBr
10-22-2016, 06:15 AM #2

Above the stock level, overclocking is still considered overclocking. Although turbo speeds can be adjusted, they no longer meet Intel's definition of "turbo." The distinction between turbo multi and normal ocing is mainly in how each core is utilized. However, increasing the speed too much can cause instability. You can often go higher even on the stock voltage setting. If you leave the voltage auto, it applies more power than necessary. For better performance at the same temperature and power consumption, manually adjusting it might be more effective.

Z
Zakko181103
Member
53
10-23-2016, 07:37 PM
#3
There are some adjustments beyond the stock level, but Intel no longer considers them true turbo. The differences mainly lie in how each core responds rather than the overall speed. Once you exceed certain limits, stability drops and turbo becomes unreliable. You can push it further even on the default voltage if you prefer. Setting it manually might give better results without risking damage. I'm concerned about overclocking because I don't want to risk hardware when I could be causing harm.
Z
Zakko181103
10-23-2016, 07:37 PM #3

There are some adjustments beyond the stock level, but Intel no longer considers them true turbo. The differences mainly lie in how each core responds rather than the overall speed. Once you exceed certain limits, stability drops and turbo becomes unreliable. You can push it further even on the default voltage if you prefer. Setting it manually might give better results without risking damage. I'm concerned about overclocking because I don't want to risk hardware when I could be causing harm.

K
kirito__101
Member
123
10-25-2016, 01:28 PM
#4
You are already overclocking and doing it on auto is worse. Chances are you were overvolting on auto so you already did more "damage" than if you did it manually. I say "damage" because it probably kept in within the safe range at such a low speed so didn't actually do anything. Worrying about damaging components is not even a concern. The issue is exaggerated by people who don't know better. Keep voltages and temps in a safe range and you won't even affect the cpu's life.
Turbo gets unstable because different speeds need different voltage. It won't know how much is needed at what speed. Also anytime it changes between speeds there will be a voltage change and with that is a voltage fluctuation. That's more chances for voltage to go out of stable range and more work for the vrm. Just running at the same speed no matter how many cores are being used is simpler for you to figure out what vcore is needed as well. What's the reason to complicate things with turbo?
K
kirito__101
10-25-2016, 01:28 PM #4

You are already overclocking and doing it on auto is worse. Chances are you were overvolting on auto so you already did more "damage" than if you did it manually. I say "damage" because it probably kept in within the safe range at such a low speed so didn't actually do anything. Worrying about damaging components is not even a concern. The issue is exaggerated by people who don't know better. Keep voltages and temps in a safe range and you won't even affect the cpu's life.
Turbo gets unstable because different speeds need different voltage. It won't know how much is needed at what speed. Also anytime it changes between speeds there will be a voltage change and with that is a voltage fluctuation. That's more chances for voltage to go out of stable range and more work for the vrm. Just running at the same speed no matter how many cores are being used is simpler for you to figure out what vcore is needed as well. What's the reason to complicate things with turbo?

E
eel8
Member
177
11-01-2016, 06:24 AM
#5
You're already pushing things beyond normal levels, and doing it automatically makes things worse. It's likely you were overvolting while in auto mode, so any extra stress might have been unnecessary. I'm referring to "damage" because it probably stayed within safe limits at such low speeds and didn't cause harm. The real issue is being misinformed by others. Keeping voltages and temperatures stable will protect the CPU without affecting its lifespan.

Turbo becomes unstable since different speeds require varying voltages. It can't accurately determine the right voltage for each speed, leading to fluctuations. This increases the risk of voltage drift and puts more strain on the VRM. Running at a single speed is easier to manage and helps you understand what vcore needs. The complexity of Turbo adds unnecessary challenges for someone just starting out.

I'm planning to adjust my settings tomorrow—changing TDP, max temperature, fan curve, and switching to manual control. I'm curious about the outcome when pushing the limits. Since I have limited experience, I'm hesitant to try overclocking aggressively. Without changing the vcore, what should I use to reach 4.2? Should I keep the bus speed steady and rely on multiplier settings? Thanks for your advice—it helps a lot.
E
eel8
11-01-2016, 06:24 AM #5

You're already pushing things beyond normal levels, and doing it automatically makes things worse. It's likely you were overvolting while in auto mode, so any extra stress might have been unnecessary. I'm referring to "damage" because it probably stayed within safe limits at such low speeds and didn't cause harm. The real issue is being misinformed by others. Keeping voltages and temperatures stable will protect the CPU without affecting its lifespan.

Turbo becomes unstable since different speeds require varying voltages. It can't accurately determine the right voltage for each speed, leading to fluctuations. This increases the risk of voltage drift and puts more strain on the VRM. Running at a single speed is easier to manage and helps you understand what vcore needs. The complexity of Turbo adds unnecessary challenges for someone just starting out.

I'm planning to adjust my settings tomorrow—changing TDP, max temperature, fan curve, and switching to manual control. I'm curious about the outcome when pushing the limits. Since I have limited experience, I'm hesitant to try overclocking aggressively. Without changing the vcore, what should I use to reach 4.2? Should I keep the bus speed steady and rely on multiplier settings? Thanks for your advice—it helps a lot.

R
Russianblue765
Junior Member
34
11-01-2016, 10:19 AM
#6
Of course, I'll also look into the subject further because I haven't covered it enough before entering the BIOS.
R
Russianblue765
11-01-2016, 10:19 AM #6

Of course, I'll also look into the subject further because I haven't covered it enough before entering the BIOS.

Y
YourPassword
Member
55
11-01-2016, 12:37 PM
#7
Tdp isn't something you adjust directly. It doesn't seem like your GPU is involved here. Use the straightforward setup method. Don't alter bclk, so you can revert it back to 100. Just modify multi and vcore. I favor an offset vcore so the CPU can still downclock when idle. Keep the voltage under 1.35v; otherwise, the EVO might fail. Exceeding the CPU's speed limit causes instability and crashes. I'm not sure what you were expecting. 4.2 should be simple. Aim for 4.5. It makes sense to consider a non-K 3770 that can reach 4.3ghz without changing bclk. It seems unnecessary to invest more in the K CPU if you're lowering it.
Y
YourPassword
11-01-2016, 12:37 PM #7

Tdp isn't something you adjust directly. It doesn't seem like your GPU is involved here. Use the straightforward setup method. Don't alter bclk, so you can revert it back to 100. Just modify multi and vcore. I favor an offset vcore so the CPU can still downclock when idle. Keep the voltage under 1.35v; otherwise, the EVO might fail. Exceeding the CPU's speed limit causes instability and crashes. I'm not sure what you were expecting. 4.2 should be simple. Aim for 4.5. It makes sense to consider a non-K 3770 that can reach 4.3ghz without changing bclk. It seems unnecessary to invest more in the K CPU if you're lowering it.

P
Patrions_
Member
216
11-01-2016, 04:57 PM
#8
Honestly, I didn't really pick my own CPU. The person who did it knew I wanted something strong for gaming and I also had enough money. I think I wouldn't have been able to grasp all the details at first, maybe around 11 or 12 years old.
P
Patrions_
11-01-2016, 04:57 PM #8

Honestly, I didn't really pick my own CPU. The person who did it knew I wanted something strong for gaming and I also had enough money. I think I wouldn't have been able to grasp all the details at first, maybe around 11 or 12 years old.

T
TonimBark
Junior Member
35
11-02-2016, 07:28 PM
#9
The DTP isn't something you modify directly. It doesn't seem like your GPU is involved here. Use the straightforward setup method. Don't alter the BCLK, just adjust the multiplier and Vcore. Prefer an offset Vcore so the CPU can still downclock when idle. Keep the voltage under 1.35V; otherwise the EVO might fail. Exceeding the CPU's speed limit causes instability and crashes. I wasn't sure what you were expecting. 4.2 should be manageable. I'd target around 4.5. It makes sense to stick with a non-K 3770 that can reach 4.3GHz without changing BCLK. It appears the voltage settings are handled automatically by the motherboard, and I notice fluctuations from 1.064 up to 1.4. The temperature has never been an issue. The motherboard is an Asus P8Z77-V LX.
T
TonimBark
11-02-2016, 07:28 PM #9

The DTP isn't something you modify directly. It doesn't seem like your GPU is involved here. Use the straightforward setup method. Don't alter the BCLK, just adjust the multiplier and Vcore. Prefer an offset Vcore so the CPU can still downclock when idle. Keep the voltage under 1.35V; otherwise the EVO might fail. Exceeding the CPU's speed limit causes instability and crashes. I wasn't sure what you were expecting. 4.2 should be manageable. I'd target around 4.5. It makes sense to stick with a non-K 3770 that can reach 4.3GHz without changing BCLK. It appears the voltage settings are handled automatically by the motherboard, and I notice fluctuations from 1.064 up to 1.4. The temperature has never been an issue. The motherboard is an Asus P8Z77-V LX.

C
coolkiefer12
Member
74
11-03-2016, 12:37 AM
#10
The system is set to auto oc mode by default, which may cause unexpected behavior without user awareness. Users often face problems with overheating and voltage spikes. It’s not advised unless you’re ready for potential issues. Are you currently stress testing? What are the current temperatures?
C
coolkiefer12
11-03-2016, 12:37 AM #10

The system is set to auto oc mode by default, which may cause unexpected behavior without user awareness. Users often face problems with overheating and voltage spikes. It’s not advised unless you’re ready for potential issues. Are you currently stress testing? What are the current temperatures?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next