F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking [OVERCLOCKING] 6700k Result

[OVERCLOCKING] 6700k Result

[OVERCLOCKING] 6700k Result

J
jbone77
Member
61
04-28-2016, 10:12 PM
#1
Is 4.5GHz at 1.285V suitable, average, or problematic for the 6700k?
J
jbone77
04-28-2016, 10:12 PM #1

Is 4.5GHz at 1.285V suitable, average, or problematic for the 6700k?

K
kingsam02
Junior Member
4
04-29-2016, 06:42 AM
#2
I'm running a 4.7Ghz setup for regular use, consistently staying below 75°C in a 23°C room. This seems to be my optimal point. I experienced 85°C at 1.46V and decided against it, as it doesn't offer much benefit over 4.9Ghz except for bragging. Most users stick to 1.35V or lower for daily tasks.

My tests on unstable 4.9Ghz at 1.425V showed stability only after reaching 1.46V, which is higher than ideal.
https://valid.x86.fr/ynn1fk
K
kingsam02
04-29-2016, 06:42 AM #2

I'm running a 4.7Ghz setup for regular use, consistently staying below 75°C in a 23°C room. This seems to be my optimal point. I experienced 85°C at 1.46V and decided against it, as it doesn't offer much benefit over 4.9Ghz except for bragging. Most users stick to 1.35V or lower for daily tasks.

My tests on unstable 4.9Ghz at 1.425V showed stability only after reaching 1.46V, which is higher than ideal.
https://valid.x86.fr/ynn1fk

F
Fabuless
Junior Member
9
05-01-2016, 05:56 AM
#3
It's challenging to pinpoint exactly, but most i7-6700k models easily hit 4.5Ghz. Reaching 4.8Ghz and higher was common in the past. Checking CPU IDs works well for confirming overclock stability, even if it doesn't always pass Realbench.
F
Fabuless
05-01-2016, 05:56 AM #3

It's challenging to pinpoint exactly, but most i7-6700k models easily hit 4.5Ghz. Reaching 4.8Ghz and higher was common in the past. Checking CPU IDs works well for confirming overclock stability, even if it doesn't always pass Realbench.

F
Fritztech
Member
218
05-12-2016, 12:41 AM
#4
BigBoomBoom :
It's tough to say with certainty, but most i7-6700k models can hit 4.5Ghz without issues. Reaching 4.8Ghz and higher was common in the past. Checking via CPU ID works well, allowing for unstable overclocking while still passing validation. I've confirmed stability at 4.9Ghz with 1.4V, though it failed Realbench. I'm aware that 1.285V is quite low—my 6600k needed about 1.375V to reach 4.5GHz...
F
Fritztech
05-12-2016, 12:41 AM #4

BigBoomBoom :
It's tough to say with certainty, but most i7-6700k models can hit 4.5Ghz without issues. Reaching 4.8Ghz and higher was common in the past. Checking via CPU ID works well, allowing for unstable overclocking while still passing validation. I've confirmed stability at 4.9Ghz with 1.4V, though it failed Realbench. I'm aware that 1.285V is quite low—my 6600k needed about 1.375V to reach 4.5GHz...

H
henrikre
Member
220
05-14-2016, 09:56 AM
#5
I7-6700k works well when binned cheaply for one. My unit runs at 4.5Ghz 1.285V, 4.6Ghz at 1.3V and 4.7Ghz at 1.33V. To keep stability I require 1.39V at 4.8Ghz and 1.46V for 4.9Ghz.
H
henrikre
05-14-2016, 09:56 AM #5

I7-6700k works well when binned cheaply for one. My unit runs at 4.5Ghz 1.285V, 4.6Ghz at 1.3V and 4.7Ghz at 1.33V. To keep stability I require 1.39V at 4.8Ghz and 1.46V for 4.9Ghz.

M
125
05-15-2016, 07:30 AM
#6
What is your ideal maximum comfortable temperature?
M
MoneyMakerSock
05-15-2016, 07:30 AM #6

What is your ideal maximum comfortable temperature?

R
Raidex20
Posting Freak
751
05-15-2016, 03:55 PM
#7
I'm running a 4.7Ghz configuration for regular use, consistently staying below 75°C in a 23°C room. This seems to be my optimal point. I experienced 85°C at 1.46V and decided against it, as it doesn't offer much benefit over 4.9Ghz except for bragging. Most users stick to 1.35V or lower for daily tasks.

My validation on an unstable 4.9Ghz at 1.425V was stable only up to 1.46V, which is too high.
https://valid.x86.fr/ynn1fk
R
Raidex20
05-15-2016, 03:55 PM #7

I'm running a 4.7Ghz configuration for regular use, consistently staying below 75°C in a 23°C room. This seems to be my optimal point. I experienced 85°C at 1.46V and decided against it, as it doesn't offer much benefit over 4.9Ghz except for bragging. Most users stick to 1.35V or lower for daily tasks.

My validation on an unstable 4.9Ghz at 1.425V was stable only up to 1.46V, which is too high.
https://valid.x86.fr/ynn1fk

B
Bee101
Junior Member
37
05-15-2016, 04:47 PM
#8
I'm using a Corsair H110i on my rig. At around 4.6 OC, I'm running about 1.23v with temps staying below 54°C. I've managed higher overclocks reaching 5.0, but those times were hotter—78 to 82°C under load. It's fine for gaming, but for everyday use I'd prefer cooler runs. Adam
B
Bee101
05-15-2016, 04:47 PM #8

I'm using a Corsair H110i on my rig. At around 4.6 OC, I'm running about 1.23v with temps staying below 54°C. I've managed higher overclocks reaching 5.0, but those times were hotter—78 to 82°C under load. It's fine for gaming, but for everyday use I'd prefer cooler runs. Adam