F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Overclocking 3700x yields these results

Overclocking 3700x yields these results

Overclocking 3700x yields these results

C
Creeperman3
Senior Member
454
02-03-2019, 05:48 PM
#1
Overclocking the Ryzen 3700X to 4450 MHz at 1.2875 V successfully.
Cinebench R20 achieved 5275 with a 70 C max.
CPUZ 5988 (multi) and 539 (single) performed well.
Stable performance after several days and bench tests.
Did I miss something? Numbers like this aren't visible yet.
C
Creeperman3
02-03-2019, 05:48 PM #1

Overclocking the Ryzen 3700X to 4450 MHz at 1.2875 V successfully.
Cinebench R20 achieved 5275 with a 70 C max.
CPUZ 5988 (multi) and 539 (single) performed well.
Stable performance after several days and bench tests.
Did I miss something? Numbers like this aren't visible yet.

X
xNymeria
Junior Member
44
02-03-2019, 10:25 PM
#2
I see you're using a 3700X with stock speeds and running at 531.6 single/5583 multi in CPU-Z. Your scores look fine.
X
xNymeria
02-03-2019, 10:25 PM #2

I see you're using a 3700X with stock speeds and running at 531.6 single/5583 multi in CPU-Z. Your scores look fine.

T
TehStratosHD
Senior Member
492
02-07-2019, 07:31 AM
#3
I see you're using a 3700X with stock speeds at 531.6 single and 5583 multi in CPU-Z. Your scores look normal.
T
TehStratosHD
02-07-2019, 07:31 AM #3

I see you're using a 3700X with stock speeds at 531.6 single and 5583 multi in CPU-Z. Your scores look normal.

_
173
02-10-2019, 06:36 AM
#4
Hello.
I've set all cores to 4100 MHz (4091.71 MHz at 41 * 99.8 MHz) with a voltage of 1.346 V for my AMD 3700x.
Is this acceptable or safe?
_
_The_Aquarius_
02-10-2019, 06:36 AM #4

Hello.
I've set all cores to 4100 MHz (4091.71 MHz at 41 * 99.8 MHz) with a voltage of 1.346 V for my AMD 3700x.
Is this acceptable or safe?

H
Hellswalrus
Junior Member
45
02-14-2019, 01:59 PM
#5
1.5v when current is low or idle.
1.325v for average usage.
1.2v for high or extreme loads.
Maintaining a steady 1.34v would not strain heavy use, as it could cause the CPU to overheat quickly.
It's good that AMD supports overclocking on all its CPUs, but at PBO or PBO level 1, letting the CPU manage its own voltage and current is sufficient for most users.
H
Hellswalrus
02-14-2019, 01:59 PM #5

1.5v when current is low or idle.
1.325v for average usage.
1.2v for high or extreme loads.
Maintaining a steady 1.34v would not strain heavy use, as it could cause the CPU to overheat quickly.
It's good that AMD supports overclocking on all its CPUs, but at PBO or PBO level 1, letting the CPU manage its own voltage and current is sufficient for most users.

K
Kusiu4444
Member
170
02-14-2019, 03:35 PM
#6
But does it always operate at 1.34v? I thought a peak voltage of 1.34v would occur under high load.
Screenshot BIOS
Now I've reset the BIOS to default settings and got even better outcomes with CPU-Z.
Single-Thread
524
Multi-Thread (16T)
5569
CPU-Z test 2
I'm confident the stock 3700x configuration is safe.
K
Kusiu4444
02-14-2019, 03:35 PM #6

But does it always operate at 1.34v? I thought a peak voltage of 1.34v would occur under high load.
Screenshot BIOS
Now I've reset the BIOS to default settings and got even better outcomes with CPU-Z.
Single-Thread
524
Multi-Thread (16T)
5569
CPU-Z test 2
I'm confident the stock 3700x configuration is safe.

V
VHC
Junior Member
44
02-16-2019, 05:24 AM
#7
Because all CPUs produced have been built with default configurations, it seems reasonable to assume they are safe when operating in standard settings. It's similar to wondering if a vehicle is safe with its original safety features.
V
VHC
02-16-2019, 05:24 AM #7

Because all CPUs produced have been built with default configurations, it seems reasonable to assume they are safe when operating in standard settings. It's similar to wondering if a vehicle is safe with its original safety features.

C
ChickenPhoYou
Posting Freak
850
02-16-2019, 12:18 PM
#8
Although the argument holds strong, as a response I would mention...FX-9590.
C
ChickenPhoYou
02-16-2019, 12:18 PM #8

Although the argument holds strong, as a response I would mention...FX-9590.

P
pepsitaroh
Member
209
02-23-2019, 05:26 PM
#9
At first, it seems obvious, but with proper cooling, the inventory was sufficient. The problem lay in the fact that a complete custom loop was needed to be deemed adequate, rather than the H80i version originally packaged.
P
pepsitaroh
02-23-2019, 05:26 PM #9

At first, it seems obvious, but with proper cooling, the inventory was sufficient. The problem lay in the fact that a complete custom loop was needed to be deemed adequate, rather than the H80i version originally packaged.