F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking overclock the Ryzen 5 2600 using the built-in cooler

overclock the Ryzen 5 2600 using the built-in cooler

overclock the Ryzen 5 2600 using the built-in cooler

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
Z
ZethPlays
Member
195
09-06-2018, 10:21 PM
#1
hello guys i'm planning to overclock the ryzen 5 2600 on an asrock b450m pro4 without an aftermarket cooler. i want something reasonable, not extreme. ram will be 3000mhz and i aim for 3.8ghz to 3.9ghz, with volt settings between 1.3 and below. the psu seems fine. thanks!
Z
ZethPlays
09-06-2018, 10:21 PM #1

hello guys i'm planning to overclock the ryzen 5 2600 on an asrock b450m pro4 without an aftermarket cooler. i want something reasonable, not extreme. ram will be 3000mhz and i aim for 3.8ghz to 3.9ghz, with volt settings between 1.3 and below. the psu seems fine. thanks!

X
xTayy_
Member
70
09-21-2018, 04:27 PM
#2
Avoid using the original cooler, opt for the aftermarket A.S.A.P. version.
X
xTayy_
09-21-2018, 04:27 PM #2

Avoid using the original cooler, opt for the aftermarket A.S.A.P. version.

A
Axel3D
Junior Member
27
10-11-2018, 06:15 PM
#3
As long as you monitor the temperature, it's okay. The stock cooler is capable of handling light OC.
A
Axel3D
10-11-2018, 06:15 PM #3

As long as you monitor the temperature, it's okay. The stock cooler is capable of handling light OC.

W
WF_Catt
Posting Freak
761
10-13-2018, 11:57 AM
#4
As long as you monitor the temperature, it's okay. The stock cooler is capable of handling light OC. I also know thank you, but is 1.3v a bit high?
W
WF_Catt
10-13-2018, 11:57 AM #4

As long as you monitor the temperature, it's okay. The stock cooler is capable of handling light OC. I also know thank you, but is 1.3v a bit high?

J
Jelly1233
Member
190
10-16-2018, 04:34 AM
#5
DavidM012 suggests using an aftermarket cooler instead, explaining that pushing it too hard isn't advisable.
J
Jelly1233
10-16-2018, 04:34 AM #5

DavidM012 suggests using an aftermarket cooler instead, explaining that pushing it too hard isn't advisable.

D
DRGNdragsYT
Senior Member
723
10-22-2018, 02:27 PM
#6
It won't be a major overclock. The point is to try anyway when you realize a better temperature with a larger cooler will come. You'll need to adjust many settings, and you can't predict the temperature it will produce even if you know your desired voltage. This might cause overheating before you've had a chance to install the improved cooler.

Begin with small changes and check the temperature and vCore at each step—3.5, 3.6 GHz, 3.5, 3.6 GHz, etc.—instead of jumping directly to higher voltages like 3.8 GHz. Better safe than sorry.
D
DRGNdragsYT
10-22-2018, 02:27 PM #6

It won't be a major overclock. The point is to try anyway when you realize a better temperature with a larger cooler will come. You'll need to adjust many settings, and you can't predict the temperature it will produce even if you know your desired voltage. This might cause overheating before you've had a chance to install the improved cooler.

Begin with small changes and check the temperature and vCore at each step—3.5, 3.6 GHz, 3.5, 3.6 GHz, etc.—instead of jumping directly to higher voltages like 3.8 GHz. Better safe than sorry.

J
Jerryx01
Posting Freak
870
10-22-2018, 10:47 PM
#7
DavidM012 :
It won't be a significant overclock. What's the reason to try when you know you'll get a better oc with a larger cooler? Because you will have to tweak various settings you can't tell what temp. it will generate even if you know what voltage you want to set so you might overheat it before you had the chance to install the better cooler.
At least start with small increments and measure the temp. and vCore at each stage, 3.5, 3.6 ghz. rather than going, blam 1.3v. 3.8ghz. To err on the side of caution.
i didn t undersant so well, but i think you told me that the oc isn t worth it because of the risk of overheating the cpu?
J
Jerryx01
10-22-2018, 10:47 PM #7

DavidM012 :
It won't be a significant overclock. What's the reason to try when you know you'll get a better oc with a larger cooler? Because you will have to tweak various settings you can't tell what temp. it will generate even if you know what voltage you want to set so you might overheat it before you had the chance to install the better cooler.
At least start with small increments and measure the temp. and vCore at each stage, 3.5, 3.6 ghz. rather than going, blam 1.3v. 3.8ghz. To err on the side of caution.
i didn t undersant so well, but i think you told me that the oc isn t worth it because of the risk of overheating the cpu?

M
Manis17
Member
77
10-30-2018, 03:06 PM
#8
Yes.
M
Manis17
10-30-2018, 03:06 PM #8

Yes.

R
Roycie_Bear
Member
181
10-30-2018, 09:33 PM
#9
DavidM012 confirmed everyone's statement about minimal risk, asking if it could harm the CPU and explaining the reason.
R
Roycie_Bear
10-30-2018, 09:33 PM #9

DavidM012 confirmed everyone's statement about minimal risk, asking if it could harm the CPU and explaining the reason.

P
PieTheGuyTM
Member
152
11-01-2018, 04:50 PM
#10
The stock Wraith cooler that amd ships with the Ryzen cpus is quite often better than many budget aftermarket coolers. It's equitable to a CM hyper212 evo. It'll handle a 3.8-3.9GHz OC without issue.
Word of advice: Before doing
ANY
OC, do a serious amount of research on the subject, there's a whole lot more to it than just adjusting vcore by picking a number.
P
PieTheGuyTM
11-01-2018, 04:50 PM #10

The stock Wraith cooler that amd ships with the Ryzen cpus is quite often better than many budget aftermarket coolers. It's equitable to a CM hyper212 evo. It'll handle a 3.8-3.9GHz OC without issue.
Word of advice: Before doing
ANY
OC, do a serious amount of research on the subject, there's a whole lot more to it than just adjusting vcore by picking a number.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next