Outperform Microsoft in your own game?
Outperform Microsoft in your own game?
Hey everyone, today I was playing around with my phone and testing a remote connection using Chrome. I wanted to verify if it functioned properly, so I installed the PC version of the app from Google. The Chrome extension I used was linked to my desktop. I successfully connected my phone to the computer without any issues—just a few clicks and it was done. The interface was smooth, responsive, and the controls felt precise.
I noticed my computer runs Windows 7 Professional, which made me think about trying Microsoft’s own remote desktop solution. I explored the app store and downloaded the official MS app. The process involved getting my IP address, entering it into the app, logging into the desired local account, and connecting remotely. The experience was frustrating—slow, laggy, and with noticeable delays even for mouse movements.
It struck me that Microsoft has been developing this feature since Windows XP, making it a premium capability. It’s surprising how long it took for such a tool to become widely accessible, especially when it seems like a simple upgrade. I’m curious what others think and would love to hear your feedback or try it out yourself. This could definitely be a great subject for a quick tech talk!
I attempted to use an Android phone with Windows OS, trying both Google and Microsoft solutions. Since I don’t own a Windows phone, I’m reaching out for feedback from others!
Microsoft isn't doing great anymore. They seem to lack any real excitement. Windows, WP, and the Surface all feel dull. Their design and user experience don't really engage me. Everything about Google really captures my interest, and I believe Microsoft will fall behind in the consumer sector soon.
I personally rely on Splashtop for my remote connection requirements. I appreciate being able to link to my computer from any location with a signal. It's not flawless, but it works adequately. I'm also wondering if TeamViewer offers reduced lag compared to the desktop version, which seems to provide less delay for a friend six hours away. I'd love to use Shields streaming universally—it's truly impressive.
It's reasonable to consider this. A significant amount of third-party solutions performs better than first-party ones since certain individuals invest varying resources into projects, while others allocate more. Many people possess superior methods or innovative approaches. Don't assume Microsoft will handle everything optimally—they aren't. Also, explore alternative programs. There are numerous options beyond just the two mentioned, each offering distinct capabilities.
Remote Desktop was created mainly for managing tasks in business or office settings. In those contexts (connecting to monitor-less, GPU-free servers, virtual machines, etc.), it serves as the top choice and also allows command line usage so you can run mstsc.exe with your own scripts or applications. I haven’t tried the Google version, but it appears they built it with a consumer focus. I’m not claiming Google’s is inferior—they’re just two similar tools aimed at different goals. During my college days, we used Remote Desktop Connection to access servers across the country (~5,000 km apart) and it always performed perfectly.
Another good observation, hadn't considered "remoting into monitor-less, GPU-less servers" or "remoting into virtual machines." Yes, I can see that now, but my focus was more on comparing my phone setup to Microsoft's Remote Desktop and Google's solutions.