F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Optimize Windows Server 2012 performance with load balancing techniques.

Optimize Windows Server 2012 performance with load balancing techniques.

Optimize Windows Server 2012 performance with load balancing techniques.

B
Boxygirl2
Member
85
04-01-2016, 08:31 PM
#1
Hello everyone, I've got 2 Exchange servers that I wish to load balance. The OS is 2012 datacenter. I've given each server a NIC and I've assigned an IP for the cluster. Server 1 has an IP of 192.168.1.20 and the second one has 192.168.1.21. The cluster IP has the IP of 192.168.1.236. I looked at both NICs and I see. "No Internet Access".
B
Boxygirl2
04-01-2016, 08:31 PM #1

Hello everyone, I've got 2 Exchange servers that I wish to load balance. The OS is 2012 datacenter. I've given each server a NIC and I've assigned an IP for the cluster. Server 1 has an IP of 192.168.1.20 and the second one has 192.168.1.21. The cluster IP has the IP of 192.168.1.236. I looked at both NICs and I see. "No Internet Access".

S
sandieaak
Member
182
04-02-2016, 12:16 AM
#2
Consider configuring DHCP for your setup. My system has a Server 2008 R2 in the datacenter, and it's using DHCP.
S
sandieaak
04-02-2016, 12:16 AM #2

Consider configuring DHCP for your setup. My system has a Server 2008 R2 in the datacenter, and it's using DHCP.

H
HappyHavoc
Junior Member
10
04-07-2016, 09:29 AM
#3
NLB requires a fixed IP address. It's better to avoid dynamic IPs on servers.
H
HappyHavoc
04-07-2016, 09:29 AM #3

NLB requires a fixed IP address. It's better to avoid dynamic IPs on servers.

M
maxii95230
Junior Member
11
04-09-2016, 04:26 AM
#4
No, I don't use a network bridge.
M
maxii95230
04-09-2016, 04:26 AM #4

No, I don't use a network bridge.

Z
ZenaKing
Junior Member
40
04-09-2016, 07:59 AM
#5
Hmm, seems like it functions on one server but not when connected to the cluster's IP address.
Z
ZenaKing
04-09-2016, 07:59 AM #5

Hmm, seems like it functions on one server but not when connected to the cluster's IP address.

A
AOCTHEDUDE
Member
57
04-09-2016, 09:13 AM
#6
Are you confirming that your DNS and subnet settings are correctly configured?
A
AOCTHEDUDE
04-09-2016, 09:13 AM #6

Are you confirming that your DNS and subnet settings are correctly configured?

R
ReborntoKill
Posting Freak
821
04-14-2016, 05:51 PM
#7
Yes.
R
ReborntoKill
04-14-2016, 05:51 PM #7

Yes.

S
Snufferlug
Member
68
04-21-2016, 03:32 PM
#8
Usually you run a dedicated tool for load balancing and split mailboxes across multiple servers. For example, the link shows a Microsoft resource. What specific goal are you aiming for?
S
Snufferlug
04-21-2016, 03:32 PM #8

Usually you run a dedicated tool for load balancing and split mailboxes across multiple servers. For example, the link shows a Microsoft resource. What specific goal are you aiming for?

O
OpSpambot
Member
57
04-21-2016, 11:01 PM
#9
Ensure even distribution of tasks across servers so that if one fails, others continue functioning.
O
OpSpambot
04-21-2016, 11:01 PM #9

Ensure even distribution of tasks across servers so that if one fails, others continue functioning.

A
Alverex
Junior Member
23
04-23-2016, 09:52 AM
#10
You're asking about load balancing and redundancy. With load balancing, you can distribute the workload between servers. For redundancy, you aim to keep operations running even if one server fails. It seems feasible to combine both approaches, but you should clarify your priorities first.
A
Alverex
04-23-2016, 09:52 AM #10

You're asking about load balancing and redundancy. With load balancing, you can distribute the workload between servers. For redundancy, you aim to keep operations running even if one server fails. It seems feasible to combine both approaches, but you should clarify your priorities first.