F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Optimize settings, upgrade components, and ensure proper cooling for better performance.

Optimize settings, upgrade components, and ensure proper cooling for better performance.

Optimize settings, upgrade components, and ensure proper cooling for better performance.

D
DiamondManJDP
Junior Member
17
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM
#1
I understand that similar devices are available in MacBooks and they function well over the internet. My Lenovo Z51-70 specs include: CPU – Intel Core I5 5200U at 2.7 GHz; RAM – Dual Channel DDR3 8GB at 1600MHz; GPU – Intel HD 5500; GPU2 – AMD Radeon 375M with SSD. I’m not focusing on games, since it’s already known newer titles won’t run smoothly. Browsing and streaming work fine—YouTube plays without issues, scrolling is smooth, and even high-resolution videos at 1080p 60FPS play without stuttering. When rewinding a video, the smoothness depends on how the software handles it. I’ve noticed that older processors struggle with newer codecs like VP8/VP9, while newer ones handle them better. There’s a Chrome extension that changes the decoding format to H264, which older CPUs support. On my machine with an overclocked Core 2 Duo and GTX 960, 4K playback is possible because the GPU handles decoding. I also saw that switching the AMD graphics card in Windows settings helps, but only if it’s the right one. When live streaming appears, the Intel HD 5500 manages the task itself; for video playback, the processor takes over. This shows there are effective solutions to improve performance. I shared these observations and thought you might have insights on similar setups or drivers.
D
DiamondManJDP
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM #1

I understand that similar devices are available in MacBooks and they function well over the internet. My Lenovo Z51-70 specs include: CPU – Intel Core I5 5200U at 2.7 GHz; RAM – Dual Channel DDR3 8GB at 1600MHz; GPU – Intel HD 5500; GPU2 – AMD Radeon 375M with SSD. I’m not focusing on games, since it’s already known newer titles won’t run smoothly. Browsing and streaming work fine—YouTube plays without issues, scrolling is smooth, and even high-resolution videos at 1080p 60FPS play without stuttering. When rewinding a video, the smoothness depends on how the software handles it. I’ve noticed that older processors struggle with newer codecs like VP8/VP9, while newer ones handle them better. There’s a Chrome extension that changes the decoding format to H264, which older CPUs support. On my machine with an overclocked Core 2 Duo and GTX 960, 4K playback is possible because the GPU handles decoding. I also saw that switching the AMD graphics card in Windows settings helps, but only if it’s the right one. When live streaming appears, the Intel HD 5500 manages the task itself; for video playback, the processor takes over. This shows there are effective solutions to improve performance. I shared these observations and thought you might have insights on similar setups or drivers.

H
Hypocat
Member
59
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM
#2
Get an SSD. Most of what you’re talking about relates to the slow SSH server. It might have at most a 16GB drive, which is practically useless even as a cache. A regular SSD like a WD Blue or MX500 will make a big difference for this kind of system. The YT playback still works fine since my laptop has an i5 4200U that handles it without problems. Older AMD cards are known to be problematic—not just because of the brand but because they were cheaper and poorly built. If you’re using an older Windows 10 setup (not the version itself) you might want to start over and do a clean install, which usually helps a lot. There could also be driver issues, but those are likely tied to the old Windows installation too.
H
Hypocat
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM #2

Get an SSD. Most of what you’re talking about relates to the slow SSH server. It might have at most a 16GB drive, which is practically useless even as a cache. A regular SSD like a WD Blue or MX500 will make a big difference for this kind of system. The YT playback still works fine since my laptop has an i5 4200U that handles it without problems. Older AMD cards are known to be problematic—not just because of the brand but because they were cheaper and poorly built. If you’re using an older Windows 10 setup (not the version itself) you might want to start over and do a clean install, which usually helps a lot. There could also be driver issues, but those are likely tied to the old Windows installation too.

J
JULIANO030
Member
226
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM
#3
He has a preference: or at least I think SS stands for solid state. Otherwise, definitely opt for an SSD—it really makes a big impact. My own experience is the contrary. The flash player performed poorly on low-end machines. HTML5 offered significantly better performance compared to flash on my older P4 processor back then.
J
JULIANO030
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM #3

He has a preference: or at least I think SS stands for solid state. Otherwise, definitely opt for an SSD—it really makes a big impact. My own experience is the contrary. The flash player performed poorly on low-end machines. HTML5 offered significantly better performance compared to flash on my older P4 processor back then.

S
ShaplessSeven7
Junior Member
7
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM
#4
SSHD combines a traditional hard drive with a solid-state cache.
S
ShaplessSeven7
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM #4

SSHD combines a traditional hard drive with a solid-state cache.

P
Poop_Head27
Posting Freak
820
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM
#5
Windows 10 on a freshly installed system feels similar. My Dell Latitude e7240 with an Intel Core i5 5300u offers a bit more performance, around 200Mhz faster. It comes with a 256GB SSD from Samsung, and YouTube runs a little smoother, though the difference isn’t huge. I’m using remote lessons, Google Meet, and the processor struggles with it. The Core 2 Quad Q8400 handles everything just fine even with a 12-year-old chip. I’m unsure what could be improved, but I remember YouTube worked well on my old laptop. Now there are newer video codecs like VP8 and VP9, but the Core i5 5200U likely doesn’t support them—only H264 does.
P
Poop_Head27
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM #5

Windows 10 on a freshly installed system feels similar. My Dell Latitude e7240 with an Intel Core i5 5300u offers a bit more performance, around 200Mhz faster. It comes with a 256GB SSD from Samsung, and YouTube runs a little smoother, though the difference isn’t huge. I’m using remote lessons, Google Meet, and the processor struggles with it. The Core 2 Quad Q8400 handles everything just fine even with a 12-year-old chip. I’m unsure what could be improved, but I remember YouTube worked well on my old laptop. Now there are newer video codecs like VP8 and VP9, but the Core i5 5200U likely doesn’t support them—only H264 does.

S
Samina
Junior Member
33
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM
#6
The temperatures are higher than usual. These older systems could be struggling with heat problems. They aren't the fastest CPUs, but they should still function. The main processor has a GTX 960 integrated, handling most of the processing. You might benefit from using the latest Intel HD graphics drivers. The original manufacturer drivers are often outdated and may not install properly—download the driver files without the executable and set them up manually via Device Manager.
S
Samina
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM #6

The temperatures are higher than usual. These older systems could be struggling with heat problems. They aren't the fastest CPUs, but they should still function. The main processor has a GTX 960 integrated, handling most of the processing. You might benefit from using the latest Intel HD graphics drivers. The original manufacturer drivers are often outdated and may not install properly—download the driver files without the executable and set them up manually via Device Manager.

P
Piratius58
Member
62
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM
#7
The GTX 960 handles video decoding itself, while the Core i5 5200U does the same without a dedicated graphics card. The built-in graphics support streaming via the task manager, but not movie playback. Would an AMD Radeon 375M be able to decode video like the GTX 960?
P
Piratius58
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM #7

The GTX 960 handles video decoding itself, while the Core i5 5200U does the same without a dedicated graphics card. The built-in graphics support streaming via the task manager, but not movie playback. Would an AMD Radeon 375M be able to decode video like the GTX 960?

M
ML_Covannal_
Member
228
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM
#8
The HD 5500 supports decoding. Updating to the latest drivers might be necessary since the older ones could be outdated. What browser are you running? I’m aware Firefox offers better performance on older hardware thanks to its hardware acceleration.
M
ML_Covannal_
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM #8

The HD 5500 supports decoding. Updating to the latest drivers might be necessary since the older ones could be outdated. What browser are you running? I’m aware Firefox offers better performance on older hardware thanks to its hardware acceleration.

F
farazofbuscus
Member
212
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM
#9
I use Google Chrome and the driver is from 2020, so it’s up-to-date.
F
farazofbuscus
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM #9

I use Google Chrome and the driver is from 2020, so it’s up-to-date.

B
BlooPancake
Junior Member
48
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM
#10
It's really impressive how powerful the Q8400 is considering its age. Even back in 2021, it felt like a solid choice for many users. It keeps up with budget laptops quite well. I also own a Q6600 in a server setup, and it performs surprisingly well there too.
B
BlooPancake
04-23-2016, 07:20 PM #10

It's really impressive how powerful the Q8400 is considering its age. Even back in 2021, it felt like a solid choice for many users. It keeps up with budget laptops quite well. I also own a Q6600 in a server setup, and it performs surprisingly well there too.