opinion
opinion
I don't rely on calculators much. I just assess the stresses my builds will face and what the function should do, along with my goals. To be honest, that calculator is the one I've used for years (except for math ones).
I set up with 8700K at 110% overclock, 16GB RAM and two RTX 2060s. So far I haven’t seen any signs of a bottleneck in performance. I’d expect most current configurations to have less of a limiting factor compared to, say, using a 2080Ti with a Core 2 Quad. That setup definitely creates a bottleneck. Lol.
I noticed the platform tends to favor NVIDIA graphics cards to minimize bottlenecks, as suggested in some tests. It leans toward AMD options or other alternatives, though that’s a bit subjective based on my analysis of computer configurations.
I'm not sure how everything functions. I imagine NV would need to compensate people for biased opinions, which seems unlikely. It's probably AMD GPUs aren't really competing with NVidia just yet. There must be some balance in play. You share your data, but the outcomes should be treated with caution.
The 2080ti card is capable of handling high-resolution playback at 8K gaming with smooth 144hz and 144fps. Its graphics power alone isn't the issue; the CPU to GPU processing gap is the main constraint. High CPU speeds and thread counts can limit performance, while memory latency and bandwidth also affect overall efficiency.
this is the problem with a lot of other sites like that and userbenchmark. they tend to prefer certain things or at least lean a certain way when ot comes to giving out some useful data which may not be accurate or right in terms of someone building a system or in terms of deciding upon a certain computer part whether its worth it or not. I think the reviewers on youtube are a better metric in that regard. but getting back to the bottleneck thing. I believe there was more of a consensus that gpu ones are more favorable to cpu ones.